These will be 42 myths with data as on this website, and this is now only to represent a section: https://pudding.cool/2019/10/shelters/

These will be just 10 SVG pictograms per group that fill up depending on the percentage of "believers"

Тут это пока самый грубый подсчёт, авторы методики поинтереснее и более нюансированно раскладывают: • радость = удовольствие + смысл • ответственность = смысл + усилие • поток (наслаждение) = удовольствие + усилие Если успею - попробую так ещё добавить/обработать

Include PTSD and CPTSD criteria + Mean score + the Score of Trauma Exposure (Demographic and Clinical Characteristics) - or separately + Religiosity Criteria there + include the cutoffs

These are participants who explicitly selected "No" for the following question: "During childhood (0–18), did you experience such [were described before in the instruction] traumatic events?"

This is the one we most probably go with, since it includes the ITQ subscales and both scales we validated (PhD friendly story)

Should maybe include an M of traumatic events experienced or this should go to the description? One of the inclusion criteria was to have at least one traumatic event and/or Adverse childhood experience

Network Analysis is a hypothesis-generating approach, especially at this stage when it was not applied before for these domains and samples. We can, however, state what we expect: the trauma symptoms to be highly associated with religious struggles