This topic dives into the dark reality of Pixars desire to engage the parents or adults to think directly about their violent and "Rated R" values. The author points out the scene in which Woody pushes Buzz out of the window. It also goes into telling the viewers how we are altering our values from "us revolving around objects" to "objects revolving us around". The argument in this section is that we will surround ourselves with objects and eventually dump them and forget them. We will create a "city of mass-consumption". It will collectively join the rest of the conversation in the arguments desire to expose just how great Pixar films are engaging children to begin to question their own involvement of "mass-consumption" and exposing adults to decide whether or not we should continue the path of "mass-consumption" and overall destructive tendencies.

This marks a transition sentence.

This is the topic sentence for the first paragraph.

Also seen portrayed by Lucas films in "Star Wars: A New Hope" you see C3P0 as depicted as a human. He is portrayed as a "clumsy", "uncoordinated" and "clueless" and is always in dire need to be saved. You are than introduced to R2D2 who is not objectified as a human and he is intelligent.

Sincerely is the passion to which we strive so eloquently to engage in the production of another race to dominate and strangle as "ours" and breathe light unto. We feel this need to fill holes in our life with "things" and we, as alpha species must be the dominant of all.

Even though this is to be seen as normal everyday play from a young girl playing dolls. Pixar hits home to the males in the crowd because it forces young and old men to question their childhood growing up and playing with dolls or "action figures" yet this little playful touch from the motion picture company also allows us to see the gender objectification that we as society places on our children that boys have boy toys and girls have girl toys.

Do parents see this when they watch the movies? I fear that even as intelligent as this is, that most parents can hardly see through the tape and see the behind the scenes action taking place. Unless a person has taken philosophy courses or film courses in school they might not see these however if one is looking for these issues they become more clear. I as a child who saw these movies as a young adult did not see this as an issue and now that I am a parent showing these to my kids I feel that I only recognize these issues because I myself have been introduced to them.

Seen a lot in Wall-E with the robots being in complete servitude to the humans. Other Pixar movies have shown this ownership over entities by humans. With Toy Story the toys are shown to have life and they are only to live for the imagination of the humans.

Pixar has shown that they are more into the industry of studying movement and its dynamics. it just falls into the realm of movies. They have transformed the study of movement into films.

This section of text immediately shows the authors credibility. He transports us (the reader) directly into the issue.

The drive for protection and the building of capitalism was essential for America's ability to later dislocate itself from Britain.

Another question to ask is whether Karl Marx's account of capitalism and free trade accounted for the need to produce more commodities with lower production cost. In the new Americas is there also not a reason that because of the lands ability to reproduce commodities could venture to say that one lands fruitfulness and the lack of another's fueled the fire that we call slavery or free wage work?