30 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. No epilogue, I pray you. For your play needs 2151  no excuse. Never excuse. For when the players are 2152  all dead, there need none to be blamed.

      While Theseus jests about how awful the play was, there was most likely a part of the actors' minds, especially bottom, that believed that this line meant that they were all sentenced to death for putting on a bad show.

    2. THESEUS  1997 Now is the ⌜wall down⌝ between the two 1998 220 neighbors. DEMETRIUS  1999 No remedy, my lord, when walls are so 2000  willful to hear without warning.

      In an adaptation, I can imagine this being the breaking point in the event that the actors do take all the previous quips seriously somehow. The act of a wall moving out of the way is similar enough to the metaphor of a wall being broken down that it could represent the barrier of humor versus laughter collapsing on the spot.

    3. I wonder if the lion be to speak. DEMETRIUS  1940 No wonder, my lord. One lion may when 1941  many asses do.

      While they most likely laugh at such a joke in the situation, imagining this joke being so apt to describe the play that no one laughs out of mutual understanding is much more amusing.

    4. He hath rid his prologue like a rough colt; 1905  he knows not the stop. A good moral, my lord: it is 1906  not enough to speak, but to speak true. HIPPOLYTA  1907 Indeed he hath played on this prologue like 1908 130 a child on a recorder—a sound, but not in 1909  government. THESEUS  1910 His speech was like a tangled chain—nothing 1911  impaired, but all disordered. Who is next?

      By having many characters' views of the play, each comparison or metaphor that is made builds onto the concept of just how bad the play is. Even if the play already sounds horrendous to readers of Shakespeare's work, these lines that manage to insult the actors' work in so many unique and interesting ways create such an openly critical view of the play that not even viewers outside of an eighth wall can find anything about the performance to take seriously. This is a point to take into consideration when writing and directing an adaptation.

    5. Our sport shall be to take what they mistake; 1875  And what poor duty cannot do, noble respect 1876  Takes it in might, not merit.

      He's saying to acknowledge the effort that the actors put in, but this quite ironically foreshadows just how bad the play is that no one is quite capable of appreciating any semblance of effort in the performance.

    6. That is hot ice and wondrous strange snow!

      This could either be seriously asking how the play could resolve such outlandish conflict, or it could be satirically making fun of the play's title for being so outlandish that the plot doesn't sound real. I choose the latter to be the more entertaining option.

    7. Are of imagination all compact.

      This line means to compare all forms of crazed person and lump them into one group. While it is simply a phrase, I find it interesting to imagine the main characters lost in the forest to be direct comparisons of these. The lovers could be any of them is strange manners but applies most specifically to Lysander and Hermia. The lunatic is most likely Helena, as she was the one who caused part of the situation out of jealousy. the poets are, of course, the actors that were practicing in the woods. Calling Bottom a poet feels a little too kind to the character, though. Each of these definitions could factor into how they are depicted in any given adaptation.

    1. for 1776  we are to utter sweet breath, and I do not doubt but 1777  to hear them say it is a sweet comedy

      Apparently, he hasn't matured that much, though, as he completely misunderstands the play and the fact that they most likely can't smell their breath anyway. Alternatively, he could just be predicting how bad the play will go and preemptively marketing the sheer nonsense that will be displayed.

    2. I will tell you everything right as it fell 1765  out.

      Knowing Bottom's sense for theatrics, they would have been here for a while. Conversely, Bottom's immediate line is to cheer up his fellow actors and spur them to action. Also, he seems to have developed on how the lion's part in the play should be played. It shows an odd sense of maturity for a character whose only intelligent line was spoken with the head of an ass.

    1. It shall be called “Bottom’s Dream” because 1730  it hath no bottom

      Firstly, this dream did, in fact, have a bottom in all contexts. The character was present, there is a start and ending, and there was most certainly a lowest point in this story of his. Secondly, how false this statement is can be inferred to mean that Bottom's simi-wisecracks are limited to when he was an ass. In other words, Bottom is dumber than a donkey.

    2. my love to Hermia, 1677  Melted as the snow

      The drug might have had some severe side effects about their feelings of each other, which most likely won't be addressed by the fairies at any point.

    3. Now thou and I are new in amity, 1596  And will tomorrow midnight solemnly

      They turned around on their opinion of each other quite quickly. I like to imagine this as Bottom looking so ugly and unattractive after the drug wore off that Titania started to view Oberon as not so bad.

    4. And stick muskroses in thy sleek smooth head,

      Smooth and furry... I'm not sure how this would take place, but it may allude to how the drug works. It is still likely that she sees Bottom like he is (with an ass head), but with many of his imperfections as perfections instead.

    1. var _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____ = function(name) {return (self._wb_wombat && self._wb_wombat.local_init && self._wb_wombat.local_init(name)) || self[name]; }; if (!self.__WB_pmw) { self.__WB_pmw = function(obj) { this.__WB_source = obj; return this; } } { let window = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("window"); let self = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("self"); let document = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("document"); let location = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("location"); let top = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("top"); let parent = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("parent"); let frames = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("frames"); let opener = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("opener"); let arguments; {window.addEventListener('load', alignSegs.bind(null,'segftln-1500','segftln-1488','seg-1488')); }}In your waking shall be shown. 1501 490  var _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____ = function(name) {return (self._wb_wombat && self._wb_wombat.local_init && self._wb_wombat.local_init(name)) || self[name]; }; if (!self.__WB_pmw) { self.__WB_pmw = function(obj) { this.__WB_source = obj; return this; } } { let window = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("window"); let self = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("self"); let document = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("document"); let location = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("location"); let top = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("top"); let parent = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("parent"); let frames = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("frames"); let opener = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("opener"); let arguments; {window.addEventListener('load', alignSegs.bind(null,'segftln-1501','segftln-1488','seg-1488')); }} Jack shall have Jill; 1502   var _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____ = function(name) {return (self._wb_wombat && self._wb_wombat.local_init && self._wb_wombat.local_init(name)) || self[name]; }; if (!self.__WB_pmw) { self.__WB_pmw = function(obj) { this.__WB_source = obj; return this; } } { let window = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("window"); let self = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("self"); let document = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("document"); let location = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("location"); let top = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("top"); let parent = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("parent"); let frames = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("frames"); let opener = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("opener"); let arguments; {window.addEventListener('load', alignSegs.bind(null,'segftln-1502','segftln-1488','seg-1488')); }} Naught shall go ill;

      While Robin does not know this, "Jill" is to be sentenced to death if she stays with "Jack." Also, I'm not sure if "Jack and Jill" are the right two to refer to a deeply loving couple as.

    2. Let her not hurt me. I was never curst;

      This line in particular is quite comedic considering the two men that she asks for protection are, in fact, the cursed ones.

    3. I would I had your bond. For I perceive 1291 280 A weak bond holds you. I’ll not trust your word.

      Each of them is under the same curse while they accuse each other of not being under said curse, although they don't know it. The fact that no one understands the minds of any other makes this scene extraordinarily chaotic.

    4. Is all the counsel that we two have shared,

      Considering that Helena was here to expose Hermia's getaway attempt, this camaraderie is no more than a ruse to guilt trip Hermia for playing what Helena thinks is a cruel prank on her. Nevertheless, the guilt seems to be following suit.

    5. Scorn and derision never come in tears.

      I can't tell if this is an artifact of the times where crying was considered a pathetic act and an indicator of dishonesty or if he is spewing nonsense while intoxicated for comedic effect.

    6. A privilege never to see me more. 1093  And from thy hated presence part I ⌜so.⌝ 1094  See me no more, whether he be dead or no.

      Due to this line, Hermia seems like either the most composed character of all or the least composed character of all. She could be weighing her options in order to realize that Demitrius's help is of bad value, or she could be simply too hateful of Demitrius to realize the situation that she is in.

    7. Being o’er shoes in blood, plunge in the deep 1062  And kill me too

      This scene would do well in a more produced interpretation as a direct juxtaposition to the antics of Lysandre's intoxication. Cutting between the two may enhance the comedy of this scene.

    8. Or russet-pated choughs, many in sort, 1033  Rising and cawing at the gun’s report

      "He is using them as a simile to describe how Bottom's fellow actors reacted when they saw him with the ass's head..." This line that details the actors' reactions to Bottom's transformation could play an important part in depicting the scene in an adaptation. It describes how the chaos was instant enough for all the actors to go crazy and run before thinking about what was happening.

  2. Sep 2026
    1. I, Pyramus, am not 0824  Pyramus, but Bottom the weaver. This will put them 0825  out of fear.

      The way I see it, Bottom is slightly dumb for insinuating both of these things. He wishes credit for the incredible role of Pyramus, yet wishes not for the women to weep at his death. By all details of Bottom's character, he should want the ladies to cry over his demise knowing that he is Bottom.

    2. I believe we must leave the killing out, 0818 15 when all is done.

      While Bottom is shown to be the most annoying out of all the actors, the other actors are shown to be just as incompetent, if not even more in scenes like this.

    3. Tie up my lover’s tongue. Bring him silently

      While this could be her expression of annoyance with Bottom, it could also be her lack of trust in Bottom to stay with her, resulting in her wish to restrain him in some way.

      Alternatively, it could simply be a manner of bedroom preference, which could also potentially explain a stressor behind her relationship with Oberon.

    4. The summer still doth tend upon my state

      I view this both as an enticement and a threat. Titania can promise a life beyond what any mortal could imagine otherwise but could also summon hell on Earth if rejected. This conflicts with her very points made to Oberon about keeping the humans' peace, indicating that her permanent state of infatuation is directly affecting her sobriety/sanity to some extent.

    5. Thou art as wise as thou art beautiful.

      This line could potentially be viewed either as Titania's own infatuatedly misconstrued belief or as an unintentional insult towards Bottom's character, showing that he presents as both smarter and more attractive upon saying only somewhat flirtatious thoughts in order to backpedal on his own quips.

    6. 0919 O Bottom, thou art changed! What do I see on 0920  thee?

      This line is written less like one of fear and more like one of amazement, perhaps out of the suspicion that Bottom may lose his reason like a beast and attack if they act any more rudely. This potentially juxtaposes the actors' view of the lion in their play, as a lion is apparently so scary that they have to severely lighten their interpretation, while an ass shouldn't invoke fear but does impressively.

    1. From our debate, from our dissension; 0484 120 We are their parents and original.

      "The line emphasizes how serious the disagreement over the changeling boy has become. It is not just affecting Oberon and Titania personally..." Titania expresses the belief that her and Oberon are causing the problems that humans face in this monologue. This line specifically could have two interpretations from my perspective. She could be expressing her guilt and genuine sense of responsibility for the trouble caused while dismissing her quarrel with Oberon almost completely. Alternatively, she could also be using the fairies' general sense of responsibility for what the humans have been facing in their stir in order to pin fault on Oberon and, resultingly, dismiss his desire for Titania's new adopted obsession as only causing trouble.

    2. I have forsworn his bed and company.

      "...their conflict has become so intense that she has separated herself from him." Titania's separation from Oberon here seems caused by their recent quarrel, which then seems like an extension of Titania's knowledge of Oberon's and Titania's flirtatious and chaotic behaviors towards humans. Their dispute seems to go both ways for completely different reasons.