45 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. urban planners have the potential to seek bold and innovative pathways towards plans and policies that can protect communities from exacer- bated contamination while contributing to the fight against climate catastrophe

      Justice-oriented urban planning is certainly widespread in academia and advocacy circles--but does it have a foothold in actual city governments? Even the progressive Mamdani administration seems to be pushing for an unsustainable amount of new housing development without a plan for infrastructure to support it. (I am not an expert, this is a genuine question).

    2. peoples with the longest-living knowledge of Earth’s natural ecological systems

      Entails recognizing as legitimate Indigenous science and knowledge

    3. In an extractive-based economy, the nature of work is exploitative, whereas in a regenerative economy, work is viewed as more cooperative in nature and focuses on establish- ing a deep democracy rooted in equity.

      Reimagining the human-nonhuman relationship and restructuring the political economy of labor are two sides of the same coin: extraction of resources/exploitation of labor

    4. The principles included a commitment to building alternative structures, bottom-up decision making, allowing people to speak for themselves, working together in solidarity and mutuality, building just rela- tionships, and a commitment to self-transformation

      Examples of how a justice-based framework entails (necessitates?) reorganization and reinscription of societal practices involving differential power.

    1. make the victims whole

      Side note; I always find this phrase strange. A person who has undergone emotional or physical harm, material or financial loss, is incomplete and to redress the harm would be to fill in their missing parts and make them whole again.

    2. the SDGs appear to endorse the migration management approach discussed and critiqued in Part II of this article

      This makes sense. The UN emerges from and is structured along the lines of stratified Western and postcolonial societies. Management of populations by elites, however well-meaning, is its raison d'etre. Economics is the common language.

    3. Target 13.3 (education and capacity-building), countries should take into account the language and cultural practices of climate migrants (both internally displaced persons and those who cross national borders).

      Curious what this would mean in practice. Government employed anthropologists advising education policy? Expanded language accommodations for migrants? A broader question would have to do with the obligations of host countries to allow cultural autonomy and, conversely, the necessity of migrants to adapt to their new home.

    4. There is a long history of planned relocations in the Global South to accommodate large-scale infrastructure projects, such a dams, highways, and mine

      There is some resonance to this in the fight between Robert Moses and Jane Jacobs in the 1960s. Compared to what the author discusses here the NYC example can be considered a "first world problem" but still the pattern is there.

    5. If these migrants are unskilled or undocumented, there is a risk that they will be subjected to unsafe and exploitative working conditions

      Part of the problem (in my opinion) is the division--even within labor advocacy--of workers into skilled and unskilled classes

    6. migration becomes an opportunity to improve lives and promote “climate-smart” development as long as it is carefully managed by states and institutions of global governance

      A distinctly biopolitical approach. What does "carefully managed" mean here? Who manages whom? This section is informed by a critical eye at neoliberal policy.

    7. Unless states address the major gap between the emissions reductions pledged and what is required to avert catastrophic climate change, the world will experience one of the greatest waves of migration and displacement in modern history.

      The gap has not been adressed in the last 7 years; so this is essentially the issue we are/will confront

    8. human rights

      There are critiques to the priority of human rights from social science (cultural relativity), ethical philosophy (obligations vs rights; Weil, Levinas), science studies (decentering of the human subject), among others

    9. the Global North is responsible for the vast majority of historic greenhouse gas emissions

      Current discourse ("people are saying") has it that China's up and coming economic development includes more sustainable elements such as electric vehicles and renewable energy. Curious if anyone has deeper knowledge of this.

    10. disproportionate impact of climate change on African Americans

      Does this fit with an Afro-pessimist framing of the disposability and fungibility of Black bodies (Hartman, Wilderson)?

    11. condemnation

      With the UN session and "climate week" starting monday, thinking of the inefficacy of UN as a global moral police. What does their condemnation mean anymore? Even more so since Trump 2.0 and the Palestinian genocide.

    12. no more than 2°C in excess of pre-industrial levels. 3

      We have already exceeded 1.5 degrees, which was the target advocated for in 2015 by Caribbean and Pacific Island nations

  2. Sep 2026
    1. The late- nineteenth-century boosters lauded the virtues of wild nature to market L.A. as a sort of noncity city.

      Like Le Corbusier's garden cities

    2. Nature writers have documented how cities mine the hinterlands ruthlessly for raw natural resources. But they’ve declined to tell us almost anything about how the largest urban regions, and especially the poorer areas within them, disproportionately shoulder the burden of transforming nature to create all our lovely wondrous stuff.

      The metropolis is the power center of imperialist capitalism writ large. Resonates with Rosa Luxemburg's ideas on frontier resource extraction--who, incidentally, spent her time in prison compiling a herbarium

    3. e affluent Angelenos want the cheapest labor but no social services for the illegal immigrants who do it; and want the economic as well as cultural benefits of an ethnically and racially diverse city, but don’t want the diversity in their own neighborhoods;

      Highly recommend Professor Rosenbaum's book, an ethnography of domestic workers and their employers in LA

    4. You could say—to borrow a coinage from the anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss—that Americans have used L.A. to think.

      Right. Or in Freudian terms, an object of cathexis

    5. L.A. has long symbolized all other cities as places where nature is not.

      If nature symbolizes life, LA represents death--hence the infatuation with eschatological myths

    6. The concrete channel turned the basin’s most logical site for green space, and the city’s major natural connector, into an outsize open sewer that carved a no-man’s-land through many of the city’s most fragmented and park-starved areas.

      I wonder if in the 20 years since this was published LA has repackaged the area as waterfront luxury...like greenpoint or gowanus

    7. acts that are as sacred as hiking to the top of Point Mugu in the northern Santa Monica Mountains and gazing out over the Pacific Ocean to watch the dolphins leap, the ducks float, and the sun set.

      how zen

    8. Mapleton Drive showcases the denial intrinsic to the great American nature story. To say there’s no nature in cities is a convenient way of seeing if I like being a nature lover and environmentalist but don’t want to give up any of my stuff. We cherish nature as an idea of wildness while losing track of the real nature in our very houses. We flee to wild nature as a haven from high-tech industrial urban life, but refuse to see that we madly use and transform wild nature to sustain the exact life from which we seek retreat. We make sacred our encounters with wild nature but thereby desacralize all other encounters. Or in other words, if we cannot clearly understand cities and our lives within them unless we keep track of our connections to nature, still there may be some basic things we prefer not to see and understand

      This is important. Applies equally or more to suburbia as it does to cities. See David Lynch's entire oeuvre

    9. An “evil Chihuahua” moral demands that we leave the nature we live in as it is (in which case we’ll die), but a “terrorist coyote” moral urges us to eradicate nature (in which case we’ll die).

      Obviously a false choice. What is it about human psychology that we always need to have an enemy?

    10. And the genre describes nature as a unitary force or kind of place that Man encounters, and where we’ll find universal meanings—but seldom something you encounter from a specific social position and point of view.

      The other end of the spectrum: "Nature" = secularized God

    11. hey ask, importantly, who benefits most and who suffers the worst consequences as who uses and transforms nature.

      Always the important question. Here "nature" = "natural resources", a problematic equivalency

    12. The air in L.A., if polluted, is not equally polluted everywhere.

      Echoes NYC urban planning; low-income neighborhoods in the Bronx and elsewhere are saddled with freight traffic and industrial business zones

    13. none of these trademark qualities plays well in 2006

      I think that this has changed in the past 10 years. Robin Wall Kimmerer leads the pack of popular yet contemplative science/nature writing. People are seeking meaning beyond the human-built environment