3 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2021
    1. Factual statements Health care costs per person in the U.S. are the highest in the developed world President Barack Obama was born in the United States Immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally have some rights under the Constitution ISIS lost a significant portion of its territory in Iraq and Syria in 2017 Spending on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid make up the largest portion of the U.S. federal budget Opinion statements Democracy is the greatest form of government Increasing the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour is essential for the health of the U.S. economy Abortion should be legal in most cases Immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally are a very big problem for the country today Government is almost always wasteful and inefficient

      It makes me pretty surprised that so many people confused the factual statements from opinion statements. I feel like wording gives gives many clues about the category the statement should go in... This could be because I'm reading the statements in their categories, rather than hearing them jumbled together, but it is surprising to me that there were so many errors in the study.

    2. When Americans call a statement factual they overwhelmingly also think it is accurate; they tend to disagree with factual statements they incorrectly label as opinions

      I find this to be fascinating, because it explains so much of our political climate. I think that if more people understood the psychology behind our bias we would live in a much less polarized country, and our politics wouldn't be as dysfunctional.

    3. A factual statement, regardless of whether it was accurate or inaccurate. In other words, they were to choose this classification if they thought that the statement could be proved or disproved based on objective evidence. An opinion statement, regardless of whether they agreed with the statement or not. In other words, they were to choose this classification if they thought that it was based on the values and beliefs of the journalist or the source making the statement, and could not definitively be proved or disproved based on objective evidence.

      I think that these are both very strong definitions. I can't find any gaps in either of them, but I do wonder if there is ever any overlap and/or spectrum between fact and opinion? I just wonder if they can be sorted into such neat categories without simplifying them? I feel like the answer to that question is yes because I really do agree with the definitions, and I think it's beneficial for the study that they had such clear parameters/guidelines for how participants should approach each category.