7 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2025
    1. Arizona’s Medicaid program accidentally sent emails including private health information belonging to over 3,000 Arizonans to the wrong people.In a Sept. 26 press release, the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System said it sent “misaddressed member communications” to 3,177 people on Aug. 29.The data breach exposed Arizonans' names, AHCCCS identification numbers and health plan names. The letters did not include Social Security numbers, financial data or clinical information, according to the agency.AHCCCS initially indicated the breach was related to a physical mailer sent to members.In the release, the agency said it was notified of the issue "by a member who received a letter addressed to a different individual,” and that it “halted its mailing process and launched an internal investigation.”However, following inquiries from KJZZ, an AHCCCS spokesperson clarified the incident was the result of human error by AHCCCS staff as it prepared an email distribution list, not a physical mailing.“The file was processed internally by AHCCCS staff. No mail houses were involved. The breach was related to a Constant Contact email distribution,” according to a statement.The agency notified affected members after learning about the issue.“To prevent future incidents, AHCCCS has also implemented a more robust quality assurance process to strengthen safeguards around member communications,” according to the statement.In a press release, AHCCCS encouraged affected members to utilize free credit reporting services to monitor their personal information and report any suspicious activity to law enforcement and the agency. Tags News Health + Medicine
      • This is mal-information because the data is true with that data being the private health info, but it was exposed in a harmful or negligent way. The leak was not fabricated, yet the effect is harmful because private details were disclosed to unintended recipients. The key is that truthful information is weaponized by releasing it in a context that causes damage. Platforms find moderation of mal-information tricky, the overall content itself may not violate falsehood policies, but they still violate privacy norms. Algorithms inclined to surface sensitive content like through email previews or indexing worsen harm. An alert reader can spot mal-information by asking various questions like, is this private, out of context, or shared for harm rather than public benefit?
    1. The post’s “recipe” for the phony cure includes lemon and bicarbonate — short for sodium bicarbonate, or baking soda, which is commonly used as an antacid. “Mix and drink as hot tea every afternoon,” the post says. “The action of the lemon with hotter baking soda immediately kills the virus [and] completely eliminates it from the body.” This claim is baseless. According to the World Health Organization, “to date, there is no specific medicine recommended to prevent or treat the new coronavirus.” Krutika Kuppalli, an infectious diseases physician and fellow with the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, confirmed this in an interview. “There’s no data that shows using lemon juice or hot tea or anything like that would kill a virus,” she said. Angela Rogers, assistant professor of medicine at the Stanford University Medical Center, noted in an email that “there is nothing that has been shown yet to kill or eliminate COVID-19 virus, and it’s still not clear whether any other therapies in the news (steroids, targeted immune modulators, azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine) are actually helpful.” Kuppalli said people can lower their risk of contracting the virus by washing their hands, covering their coughs and sneezes, maintaining distance from each other, and following public health measures that have been implemented in their area. We’ve reported on many falsehoods and misleading statements about the new coronavirus. See “A Guide to Our Coronavirus Coverage” for stories, videos and resources.
      • This claim back during the pandemic is misinformation. The claim that hot lemon water “kills COVID-19” is false, but often shared by people who believe it to be true which is not with an intent to deceive. Websites like this debunked the claim by showing there is no scientific basis. Because of novelty bias and algorithmic amplification of home remedy posts, such content spreads quickly. Readers can identify misinformation by checking credible health sources, noticing lack of scientific backing, and seeing that it contradicts consensus from trusted authorities. Moderation systems, such as community flags or fact check tags can help reduce its spread, though they don’t always reach all audiences.
    1. A video purporting to depict voter fraud in Georgia is fake and the work of “Russian influence actors” determined to undermine faith in the integrity of next week’s presidential election, U.S. intelligence officials said Friday. The announcement that the video was fake represented an effort by the FBI and other federal agencies, four days before Tuesday’s election, to combat foreign disinformation by calling it out rather than letting it spread for days unchecked. It follows a similar statement last week that also attributed to Russian actors a widely circulated video falsely depicting mail-in ballots for Donald Trump being destroyed in Pennsylvania.

      The information on this link is a disinformation example because it portrays a voter fraud scenario that never occurred, and authorities confirm it was manufactured and amplified by external actors to undermine trust in elections. Because it was intentionally created to deceive, it meets the definition of disinformation in my opinion. An attentive reader can check fact-checking sources or official statements to spot contradictions. Algorithms tend to reward sensational or alarming content, so it likely spreads rapidly, feeding confirmation bias among groups already suspicious of election integrity. Gillespie’s idea of platform custodians is relevant: even when flagged, such content can escape moderation or reappear in different forms.

  2. Sep 2025
    1. Evaluating Accessibility When developing or redesigning a website, evaluate accessibility early and throughout the development process to identify accessibility problems early, when it is easier to address them. Simple steps, such as changing settings in a browser, can help you evaluate some aspects of accessibility. Comprehensive evaluation to determine if a website meets all accessibility guidelines takes more effort. There are evaluation tools that help with evaluation. However, no tool alone can determine if a site meets accessibility guidelines. Knowledgeable human evaluation is required to determine if a site is accessible.

      The website highlights how important it is, for us to understand accessibility. This lets us understand the various disabilities and what is the best and needed approach to help ensure they have the best experience.

    2. More Info on Making Your Website Accessible

      Users can easily navigate between sections of the website thanks to its well structured and understandable links. Users can easily recognize clickable parts because the links are easily distinguished from regular text by their distinct color and underlining. This design decision improves accessibility by guaranteeing that visitors can easily and clearly discern between links and ordinary content.

    3. Introduction to Web Accessibility

      This summary gives information that is valuable, along with different content that is available. The video also provides accessibiltiy to various users from all backgrounds who are deaf or have difficulty hearing. It provides very clear and needed information of the principles of W3C as well as the services provided. Not to mention the captions that allow for better engagment with those whos first language may not be english.

    4. This page in: Englishالعربية čeština Deutsch Ελληνικά español français Bahasa Indonesia 한국어 polski Português do Brasil русский язык 简体中文 All Translations Hide Options Web Accessibility Initiative WAI Strategies, standards, resources to make the Web accessible to people with disabilities Menu Get Involved About W3C WAI Search:

      This website provides great content in various languages, as well as ensuring that it can be easily translated judging by the amount of options it provides, therefore making it (Robust). It provides proper accessibility for language identification that allows screen readers and translation tools to switch seamlessly between the various languages that it provides. It empowers users in multilingual regions where English or other dorminant languages may not be the main language that is widely spoken.