42 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2017
    1. methodology. A

      This word choice is very clear and helps continue to make the claim that interpreting and analyzing architecture is not easy to accomplish and that there is a method to this "madness".

    2. Sometimes, in studying contemporary buildings, you may find the people who made or used the buildings speaking about bow they were used or what they meant. In some cases you may even watch and observe how people behave in various archi­tectural environments. As you move further back in time,

      This portion made a great point and that is how time plays into environments and how it affects buildings and the interpretation of architecture.

    3. n some instances architectural data can be assembled in other ways. One can study buildings depicted in literary sources such as pattern books, advice manuals,

      It's cool how this data is used to not only analyze a building or environment, but to also build an environment. For instance when they were building the new Marta development it took a lot of information , statistics, and analyze to figure out what was best and how and who they would be serving.

    4. the building permit might reveal the date when the house was con­structed and even give the name of its builder; the diary might talk about specific events that occurred in the house; the letter might describe how one of the rooms

      I love the aspect of finding other things in an attempt to discover and analyze the true meaning and accurate interpretations of any building or environment.

    5. explaining the cultural content of a building is not something you can justr/o,

      I think this is an important thing to realize when attempting to analyze a space, especially a space in which you may not live. Alot of times its hard to understand a space fully when you have never had to function within or experience that particular space.Its possible but as the article said its not just something you can do. This also goes back to the mention of how oral history and culture goes into forming a "Built Environment".

    6. This book is about architectural interpretation, the ability to find meaning in buildings. This is a skill, like most others, that requires both time and effort

      FInding meaning in architecture and interpreting it can be hard at times however it is filled with great irony because its right in front of your face. I also attempted to find the meaning of the new space discussed in the Marta Breaks ground article and I found much harder to find meaning in it , without seeing how people use it and interact within it. Shamma, Tasnim. "MARTA Breaks Ground On First Transit-Development Project." WABE 90.1 FM. WABE, 23 Aug. 2016. Web. 03 Feb. 2017.

    7. physical environment which is purposely shaped . . . according to culturally dictated plans.

      The mention of culturally dictated plan drew a parallel between the Marta Breaks ground article. Within that article they were literally doing just that by laying out the plan of the future development and sharing with the reader what they "deem" the place to be.That was interesting and accurate because it was a modern day example showing the thought process behind what goes into creating a built environment.

    8. Material culture m aybe defined, following Deetz, as “that segment of [the human] physical environment which is purposely shaped . . . according to culturally dictated plans

      This definition of Material culture sounds very similar to the definition of a built environment being that both are consciously planned and designed to serve (and not serve) certain purposes.

    9. In short, people need things— objects, artifacts, however they are referred to— to live in the world, and we make those things, not randomly or by chance, but systematically and intentionally through our culture.

      This was an interesting fact about the strategy and thought process of our environments.This relates to the Place Making article being that they are discussing some of the reasons behind there built environments such as : historical accurateness, economical impact and how it will affect the community.

    1. Category: Built Environment Analysis Posted on April 8, 2017Homelessness Vs. the City of Atlanta: Woodruff Park Homelessness Vs. the City of Atlanta: Woodruff Park Introduction: Homelessness. According to google homeless means “of a person without a home, and therefore typically living on the streets”.  Many homeless people start out with jobs and stable housing but then outside factors, such as social and economic, intervene. These factors typically cause a rapid change in their living situation. It typically happens at such a rate at which the person could not find other suitable living or income. Many times it is as fast as having a home one day and not the next or within hours. Homelessness is usually driven by two large factors that dictate a person’s living situation. Those are poverty and the lack of affordable housing. According to the National coalition for the homeless in 2004, 37 million people were living in poverty in the United States. Usually, people living in poverty or that are homeless live paycheck to paycheck and often are not able to pay the cost of having a bank account.   Homelessness today is different than any other time in the United states history. Typically, today not many people stay with one employer until retirement. Decades ago most people worked for the same company for years. Usually, until they could not work anymore due to old age. Today, on the other hand, people get laid off and have to deal with the outsourcing of their jobs to countries like china or Thailand due to their low pay wages. Not only are many jobs being outsourced by the full-time jobs are turning into part-time jobs. This means that about 25% of people that work part-time live in poverty due to the fact that these people can work more hours than they are usually given. Even with that most part-time jobs are given to young teenagers due to the fact that they are more obedient than adults. In 2007, the first minimum wage increase occurred in more than a decade. The minimum wage in 2007 was $5.15 and it was increased to $7.25 an hour. Woodruff Park statue: Atlanta From the Ashes, Downtown Atlanta It is very difficult for people that have become homeless to get back up on their feet. They struggle with many different obstacles in their path. Many homeless people have jobs but cannot make the rent in one month in Atlanta. In Atlanta, the average monthly rent for a 480 sqft studio in the suburbs is around $800. If a homeless person finds a full-time job for minimum wage and works 40 hours a week they will only make 1,160 dollars a month. The $800 does not include the utility bills and the furniture one would need to buy for the studio. For those with little experience and opportunities, it’s very hard to meet this requirement. According to the National Coalition for the Homeless 44% of homeless people who do have jobs cannot escape homelessness. The first step is housing which is hard when someone who is homeless can barely find a job that supports them.   Georgia is ranked seventh in the U.S for the highest number of homeless people. Fulton County has the most homeless people with nearly 6,000. The efforts that the City has put towards helping the homeless does little. The homeless people have already enough obstacles from the economy to go over but now they have the city of Atlanta that is also putting obstacles in their way.     Homelessness in Downtown Atlanta              Homelessness in downtown Atlanta has declined over the years according to Georgia’s 2015 Report on Homelessness. It is illustrated in the picture above that from 2011 to 2015 the homeless population had drastically decreased from 19,876 to 13,790 people. What the chart does not take into account are the hundreds of homeless people that move away looking for better jobs in other cities. Even for a person who is not homeless many times, it is hard to find a job but for a homeless person, it’s much harder due to the fact that some homeless people might not have the experience needed to get a job that will cover their rent for that month or the food that they will eat. Another thing that might drive the homeless is the fact that Atlanta’s Low-income housing does not appeal so much to homeless people who are working on minimum wage. On the affordable housing website of Georgia, the lowest price for housing was $700 a month. This does not include paying for the monthly utilities of the apartment.  Many homeless people are moved to other cities because of the fact that many shelters in downtown Atlanta are overcrowded.   The Peachtree-Pine homeless shelter   Not only is Atlanta not building more shelters they are turning old shelters into other things. In August of 2016, the Atlanta city council voted to authorize the conversion of a homeless shelter into a police and fire facility even though the audience of the council supported the stay of the shelter. This particular issue is in favor of the Atlanta police department which would eventually use the warehouse as a SWAT team location. The APD would like to “relieve some of the burden on a nearby station that services the highest number of calls in the city” said a member of the department. The fact of the matter is that Atlanta has a low amount of homeless shelters and subsidized sizing in the area already. Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed has also voiced his opinion about wanting to close down this homeless shelter as well and other state officials. His main argument for wanting to shut down the historic and important building is closely tied with its links to tuberculosis. “Laid out how tuberculosis cases, not in Georgia, but across America, are being traced back to Peachtree and Pine.”, Reed states that he has met with the CDC and has spoken to them about the things that can be done in order to safely proceed with this building. On the other hand, Anity Beaty the executive director for the Atlanta metro task force states that the shelter is compliant with the CDC protocol for treatment, spotting, and avoiding tuberculosis. Instead of the city of Atlanta taking this shelter and turning it around and giving the homeless people hope they are deciding to turn it into another government building. What does this mean for the homeless people? Most likely these homeless people that are kicked out of the building will end up going to the other overcrowded homeless shelters in the area. Though there are many homeless shelters in Atlanta not all of them will let you sleep there overnight like this one did. Homeless People in Woodruff Park   Woodruff park is located in the heart of Downtown Atlanta, Georgia between Peachtree Street NE and Park place NE. The park had a green area, two fountains, a kids playground in two areas of the park.  Robert Winship Woodruff was the president of The Coca-Cola Company from 1923 up until 1954. He ended up buying that area which is now known as Woodruff park and donating it to the city of Atlanta in 1971. Woodruff Park underwent a couple of cosmetic changes over the decades to become what it is today.               Woodruff Park is a place for the homeless community in the area to come together. Many times when one walks through Woodruff Park it is hard not to notice the homeless people sitting and conversing with one another. Most often than not, many people cannot notice the problems with this park and the extremities the City of Atlanta has gone to in order to prevent the homeless from sleeping there or spending too much time there. The city of Atlanta has put up metal barricades that you would see at concerts or events to keep the homeless in a certain area or they home put up things that are not as obvious as this. One thing that might not be as noticeable as the barricades, is the fact that every single flower pot on the outer sides of the grassland part of the park is screwed down into the edge so that it could not be moved. The flower pots that are screwed down act as an Anti-homeless in order to prevent the homeless from sleeping or laying down on the edges. From the picture presented on the left, you can see that the man can barely fit between the two flower pots. Most of the time the homeless people that do try to sit down end up throwing their things on the dirty pavement which is sometimes flooded due to underground sources.  This picture shows a subtle way that the city of Atlanta tries to remove the homeless. Just like the saying “out of sight, out of mind”. This is not the only part of the park that prohibits or restrains homeless people from laying down or even getting comfortable. In the picture to the right, it shows the outer side of the park that has benches. Clearly, the benches show the handle that is meticulously placed in the middle which makes it impossible for someone to lay down. Conclusion Even though the stage of Georgia is experiencing a decline in a number of homeless people they are harboring they are not welcoming them.

      nice cumulative claim !

    2. Woodruff Park is a place for the homeless community in the area to come together.

      Your argument is that deterrents have been strategically placed around Atlanta , in order to reduce the homeless population. Your evidence is good because you use pictures to prove your claims.

    3. Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed has also voiced his opinion about wanting to close down this homeless shelter as well and other state officials. His main argument for wanting to shut down the historic and important building is closely tied with its links to tuberculosis. “

      You had a lot of evidence sprinkled through out the paragraph , but I think you should cite each one within the text.

    4. This particular issue is in favor of the Atlanta police department which would eventually use the warehouse as a SWAT team location. The A

      Your claim seems to be about how the city of Atlanta is not providing accommodations for the homeless population, rather the exact opposite.

    5. does not take into account are the hundreds of homeless people that move away looking for better jobs in other cities.

      The chart is good evidence to part of your claim, but I would like to see you prove the reason behind the homeless population migrating out of the city.

    6.   Homelessness in downtown Atlanta has declined over t

      Your claim in this paragraph is that the homeless population is declining in ATL because of the lack of opportunity and homeless migration.

    7. 6,000

      Cite where you got the number from .

    8. they have the city of Atlanta that is also putting obstacles in their way.  

      I would find evidence to see if the obstacles are intentional or not.

    9. they

      In order to add credibility to your stats. make sure you cite where they came from.

    10. They struggle with many different obstacles in their path

      Your claim appears to be about one of the major obstacles the homeless population encounters is the lack of affordable housing.

    11. Today, on the other hand, people get laid off and have to deal with the outsourcing of their jobs to countries like china or Thailand due to their low pay wages

      To make this claim stronger I would include a citation of a credible source, I would even try to find comparative statistics to allow the reader to understand the economical difference of the times.

    12. Homelessness today is different than any other time in the United states history

      Your claim seems to be about how the current form of homelessness differs from the kind in the past.

    13. 2004, 37 million people were living in poverty in the United States. Us

      Good usage of evidence to support your claim.

    14. Homelessness is usually driven by two large factors that dictate a person’s living situation. Those are poverty and the lack of affordable housing.

      I believe this is your thesis statement and the claim you seem to be making is that homelessness is created mostly by financial poverty and overly expensive housing.

    15. Many homeless people have jobs but cannot make the rent in one month in Atlanta.

      You may want to make this sentence clearer for the reader to understnad by changing the lat portion from "make the rent in one month in atlanta" to something more understandable/ impactful. Hopefully these suggestions help (cannot make ends meet to afford housing in Atlanta) )cannot come up with rent for one month in Atlanta.)

    16. In 2007, the first minimum wage increase occurred in more than a decade. The minimum wage in 2007 was $5.15 and it was increased to $7.25 an hour.

      nice usage of statistics

    17. by t

      Not only are many jobs being outsourced, but full-time jobs are turning into part-time jobs.

      (I would just add a comma between the words outsourced and but , while also changing the word by to but.

  2. Feb 2017
    1. “How Cities Use Designs to Drive Homeless People Away, “published by The Atlantic and authored by Robert Rosenberger, was a thought provoking article which suggested and brought into discussion how cities are strategically designed to detour certain behavior and groups, in this case the homeless population. Its first example of such designs are metal spikes built into the ground outside of an apartment building. While clearly the spikes were put there in hopes of keeping the “property” homeless people free, because of their obvious and apparent nature the community quickly took notice and went to action from signing petitions, contacting local representatives, and even sending an image of the deterrent viral. While all of these were great and caused this particular story to end in a nice and expeditious manner, the author brought into question the possibility of other architecture/design deterrents that aren’t as obvious to the human’s eye such as: skateboard deterrent devices, benches’ armrest, and even uncomfortable seats, just to name a few.

      The difference between the metal spikes and the other deterrents is simply their subtleness. The article goes on to hint that the various subtle group deterrents create an “invisible problem”, saying that most people are, “like the non-skateboarder that walks unknowingly by the skateboard deterrents each day, (making) it’s easy to be someone moving through our world without seeing these power plays, enacted through design and policy, keeping the predicament of the homeless conveniently out of view. The problem remains, but it’s rendered “invisible”.

      Another point the article made, one of the last in fact, was about the importance of figuring out what values should be taken into consideration and the need of hearing out and having empathy about others needs and “alternative values.” For instance, if homeless people had the opportunity to voice their opinion in making these decisions, the city or whoever is designing may find out that their opinions actually “warrant consideration”. Which if taken seriously and implemented, communities worldwide could one day serve every one.

      Rosenberger, Robert. "How Cities Use Design to Drive Homeless People Away." The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 19 June 2014. Web. 24 Feb. 2017.

    2. Municipalities also often use the most straightforward physical structures to exclude—walls and barriers. Walled ghettos are a well-known example of physical segregation.90 Jewish people in Europe were made to live in separate, walled areas, as were Arab and European traders in China.91 This form of physical exclusion by walls and barriers is nothing new.92 However, it is not only a remnant of the distant past, but also exists in more modern examples.

      There are so many modern examples of exclusionary building and design. For example, instead of building a wall to divide a historically black neighborhood from a historically white neighborhood, now in 2017,"northern suburbs" won't allow public transpiration to keep lower income "undesirables" out of them.

    3. They tend to make decisions that focus on urban infrastructure needs without considering the impact that such decisions might have on citizens.

      This to me is like giving a kid with no shoes sandals and walking away thinking "how you must of helped him/her" without ever stopping to realize that he lives in a coastal environment. While the intent was good, the kids circumstances are not that much better than before.However, this could all be solved by communicating with the person / group you are trying to help. Which draws back to the Atlantic article were the author suggested that, "it would be wise to take into consideration alternative values and needs when making decisions/designs in communities-- especially when the groups has varying needs than your own.

    4. “[r]ace is a ubiquitous reality that must be acknowledged . . . if [planners] do not want simply to be the facilitators of social exclusion and economic isolation.”42

      This is a very common theme within both articles and even within many of the issues that this "new america" faces. Being that this countries and worlds history is rooted in a dark past of racial segregation, inequality and brutal slavery there is no possible way to evade discussing how it effected and still effects every avenue of life--including architecture. So I think both articles are identifying a major root of this issue by discussing race, color, and history.

    5. The idea that architecture regulates is found at the core of much urban planning and geography scholarship, though that body of literature does not always describe architecture as “regulation.

      Many times the these regulations in urban communities serve as walls, fences, and specifically bridges that a lot of times create a feeling of exclusion --not in a good way and a feeling of imprisonment.

    6. However, a number of social scientists and planning scholars have argued that “monumental structures of concrete and steel embody a systematic social inequality, a way of engineering relationships among people that, after a time, becomes just another part of the landscape

      The supplemental text does not support,deny, or event explain the lasting effects of architecture, beyond there intended time. I wonder if there are any situations where cities/ communities make a conscious effort to rid there environment of some of these structures/designs. Or do people simply let them remain and continue to be conducive to an environment of inequality, even if its unconscious?

    7. For example, one might think it a simple aesthetic design decision to create a park bench that is divided into three individual seats with armrests separating those seats.

      This exact example is discussed in the supplemental text from the Atlantic calling it a "pervasive homeless deterrence technology".However despite its pervasiveness for the one it is designed to deter, another person may simply see it as a "three person bench" without giving it much thought.

    8. Throughout history, people have used varied methods to exclude undesirable individuals from places where they were not wante

      While this is not discussed in the Atlantic article, I have seen this occur around my home. The local school district has worked continuously to exclude the major apartment complexes in the community --which house most of the areas working class residents, from there school zones. While this was suppose to be subtle many saw its racial and economic bias, yet turned a blind eye. So I wonder if the problem is really invisible as said in the Atlantic artlice or just flat out ignored?

    9. little attention to the use of these less obvious exclusionary urban design tactics

      Not only has the law ignored the less obvious exclusionary features and design tactics but I believe the people have to.For example, the local civilians spoke up about the metal spikes near the apartment complex and rallied behind them being taken out simply because it was in there were more apparent. However, they pass and even use less obvious deterrents every day but do not stop to question or interpret there true purpose and meaning.

    10. Bridges were designed to be so low that buses could not pass under them in order to prevent people of color from accessing a public beach.

      This seems very similar to the skateboard deterrent situation, being that it is one of those things in life you don't notice until it effects you. Just like a non- skateboarder would walk right past a skateboard deterrent a person with a car/ someone who doesn't rely on public buses would drive right under a low bridge without considering the actual implications/reasoning behind the design. Despite these being different situations, this is very reflective and conducive of the "invisible problem", that Robert Rosenberger mentions in his article.

    11. The built environment is characterized by man-made physical features that make it difficult for certain individuals—often poor people and people of color

      This supports the article, "How Cities Use Design to Drive Homeless People Away", being that homeless people are rarely homeless by choice and practically always because of some variant of a financial hardship.

    1. Sometimes, in studying contemporary buildings, you may find the people who made or used the buildings speaking about bow they were used or what they meant. In some cases you may even watch and observe how people behave in various archi­tectural environments.

      I have family all over the United States and some live on farms, some ranches, others in apartments in rural communities, and some live in houses in the city. However, no matter where I visit my family and despite my family being so similar, the homes and spaces are used in different manners based upon the architecture and the different environments. We could do the same thing at each home but some how the way we move in the different environments would vary drastically.

    2. And depend­ing too on how you feel about such things, the house may seem an attractive or an unattractive creation, a pleasant or a distasteful place in which to live.

      While I haven't heard to much about the new development from my peers perspectives. I feel as if someone, if they haven't already, will critique the new development simply based off of their preferences. This in-fact reminds me that just like most things in life the value and appreciation of architecture is also objective and based off of personal preferences.

    3. but systematically and intentionally through our culture. Culture is unseen and immaterial, consistin

      The article about the new MARTA development backs up this readings claim about these things we experience being intentional.If you read between the lines of the article about the new development, you quickly see that the development didn't just happen over night, rather it had been in the making for years and in discussion.

    4. Unlike other mammals, humans cannot simply live in nature; rather, we must devise ways of finding and making shelter, clothing and feeding ourselves, and producing the tools needed for survival.

      The reading describes the things needed for human survival as food,shelter,and the need to be clothed.I found it interesting that the development mentioned in the article "Marta Breaks Ground On First Transit-Development Project," meets all of those needs by providing local shops, restaurants, and apartments. (You can see the blueprint and the proximity of them in the picture within the link listed below.)

      (http://news.wabe.org/post/marta-breaks-ground-first-transit-development-project)

    5. IO

      The article, “MARTA Breaks Ground On First Transit-Development Project”, was a very interesting and informative article about MARTA’s first of six “transit-oriented developments”. The article focuses in on its most recent development, near Marta’s Edgewood-Candler Park station, discussing aspects of the projects such as: expectations, funding, development, purpose, and even its intentions.

      The article starts of by first mentioning that the project’s developer is Columbia Ventures LLC, a local private developer, who is covering the developments bill of 40 million, at zero cost to Marta. The development is set to include a 224-unit apartment complex, a performing arts studio, restaurants, a green space, and even a traffic circle (to combat the local traffic issue). One of the things I found most interesting was that while despite the fact that the apartments are set to bring in the most revenue, the city and the development has set aside and allocated 20% of its units to serve as low-income housing for civilians. While also mentioning that the locations of these developments were in fact intentional and are located where they are in hopes of increasing transit ridership.

      While the development near Chandler park station seems to be off to a smooth start, the article briefly alludes to issues and frustrations that have come about surrounding their other developments such as: funding, negotiations, timing, and even waiting to see what other big developments do that may affect their own.

      Shamma, Tasnim. "MARTA Breaks Ground On First Transit-Development Project." WABE 90.1 FM. WABE, 23 Aug. 2016. Web. 03 Feb. 2017.