7 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
  2. learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-beaker-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-beaker-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com
    1. Some jobs link compensation directly to work effort. Piece-work systems, whichpay workers for each bit of work they perform, are one example of this approach; soare contract workers (hired to perform a specific task, and paid only when that taskis completed). This strategy has limited application, however: usually employerswant their workers to be more flexible, performing a range of hard-to-specifyfunctions (rather than simply churning out a certain number of widgets per hour).

      Both Kling and Stanford believe that there's very little between workers and their employers.

    2. Conventionally trained economists take it as a proven fact that free tradebetween two countries always makes both sides better off.

      This can be observed within our current day in age too, pretty much every country has free trade with the rest of the world. It quite clear that this can be applied efficient in the real world.

    3. So you don’t need to be an economist to know a lot about economics.

      This isn't something I would really expect to hear, but it does make sense. It does make me wonder though, how far could you go without professional education in the field of economics?

    4. Never trust an economist with your job

      I noticed that someone else responded to this one and I wanted to give my opinion on it as well. I really do believe you shouldn't trust someone being in charge of your job when their job is solely to increase efficiency, for instance they might want to put policies into place that make for high turnover but make more money for the company.

  3. learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-beaker-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-beaker-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com
    1. Even more strikingis the fact that almost everything you consume is somethingyou could not possibly produce.

      I've thought about this a few times in the past, but never really looked into it at all. I'll look deeper and figure out just how much of this statement is true.

    2. Look at the list of ingredients in the cereal. Those ingre-dients had to be refined and shipped to the cereal manu-facturer. Again, those processes required many machines,which in turn had to be manufactured. The cereal grainsand other ingredients had to be grown, harvested, and pro-cessed. Machines were involved in those processes, and thosemachines had to be manufactured.

      Machines are such a crucial part of our world nowadays, even before the steam age we had rudimental machines and that does make me wonder, what would a world without advanced machinery look like for us?

    3. I have come to believe in the wake of the MIT trans-formation, which began soon after World War II, that econo-mists have lost the art of critical thinking.

      I think this is something to think about, if economists are no longer using critical thinking skills then this could be very dangerous for corporations in the long run