briefly
test
briefly
test
installation
test2
are
test1
differentiation
ytest
Indefinite
13:09
structure can not be directly reconstructed
cannot
MEANING is whatever the relevant idiom means.’
double quotes
his is basicallysimilar
deleted. There is no "unbasic similarity"
IQ is determined by dividing a score in an intelligence test (the mental age) by chrono-logical age.
That sounds strange. Would that mean that 60yr old would get half the IQ of a 30yr old based on the same results to a test?
Müller, Stefan. 2014d. Kernigkeit: Anmerkungen zur Kern-Peripherie-Unterscheidung.In Andreas Nolda, Athina Sioupi & Antonio Machicao y Priemer (eds.),Zwischen kernund peripherie(studia grammatica 76
...In Antonio Machicao y Priemer, Andreas Nolda & Athina Sioupi (eds.), Zwischen Kern und Peripherie ;)
X theory,76–162X theory, 80X-Theory,76,77,95,97,98,127,131,153,158,160,169,245,429,498,519,520,528,640,789X Theor
There are many Index-entries which appears twice or in this case 4 times. It is probably a problem of the scope of \index \index{\textbf{x}} =/= \index{x}
it is not possible to havea combination ofthewith a nominal constituent if this constituent was not already builtup from lexical material by Merge
Probably, it would be helpful to know why one would like to analyse fragments of phrases. Fragments are not utterances, they don't have a truth value, they only appear as parts of bigger phrases and their grammaticality can not be judged. Furthermore fragments are highly ambiguous. "und auf die" e.g. could be a part of "Er wartet auf Maria ["und auf die" Kinder"], or "Er trinkt wieder ["und auf die" Kinder hat er wieder nicht aufgepasst]." In these 2 structures, what is coordinated are completely different things (PPs or CPs). It is the complete structure which reveals the function and the combinatorial potential of its parts.
cousin. He
Coindexation of "he" with "cousin" in (7a) and "she" with "cousin" in (7b) could make it more clear that it is not an interpretation like (6b) which is intended. The same conindexation could be used in (6) to make the marking consistent.
gender
italics for emphasis? since you have talk very much about sexus.
by ten Hacken will never bea problem
I thought that ten Hacken's problem was based rather on the assumption of "maximally-specific values", and since features must be maximally-specific, there is a problem saying that "cousins" has the value "gen", since "underspecified" is not maximally specific. One could say that values are "as maximally specific as necessary", but since the cases in 6 require gender marking it is problematic to assume that its plural don't (according to maximal specificity of values)
I showedthat spurious ambiguities arise for a particular analysis of verbal complexes in Germanwhen one resolves the values of a binary feature (flip). This can be avoided by thecomplicated stipulation of a value in certain contexts
It is not quite clear where the feature "FLIP" has been discussed, and what is the connection of FLIP and spurious ambiguities with gender.
Japanisch
typo
a
an
If the head is a N,
an N
littlev
If I am right, little v means in your tree "Voice". I would keep the terminology consistent
the the
that?
She/he is very smart, isn’t she/he?
The point is quite clear, nevertheless I would recommend not to give the options in this way but: She is very smart, isn't she/*he?
with ditransitive verbs inX Theory. InX Theory, it is assumed that a headis combined with all its complements at once
But cf. Larson, Richard K. 1988. On the Double Object Construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-391. for a binary analysis of double object constructions in English, and the theories developing the VP shells (and later the Little vP).
Englisch
typo
with
who suffer from
The affected family members have intellectualand linguistic problems together with motoric problems with facial muscles
style
that has problems with language
style
For problems of sufferers of Williams Syndrome in the area of morphosyntax, seeKarmiloff-Smith et al.(1997). The discussion about Williams Syndrome is summarizednicely inKarmiloff-Smith(1998)
move to footnote
associated
directly associate
and those
and from those
FoxP2 also occurs in animals.
but it might have no particular expression in animals, so that is not an argument
with the facial muscles, dealing with non-linguistic tasks
repetition
seeBellugi, Lichtenberger,Jones, Lai & George(2000) for a discussion of the abilities of people with Williams Syn-drome)
move to footnote
I consider this is an extreme
I consider this to be too extreme
is does not
is does not --> it does not
((s\np)/np)/np
why don't you use the same notation with capital letters like in (3b)?
Zwischen kernund peripherie
Zwischen Kern und Peripherie
sign language,451–452American (ASL),450,502Sign Language,26
they belong together
lexical entry
...like (3b)
post syntactically
postsyntactically or mit Bindestrich
However, gender is normally a grammatical notion
The numerous (gender)masculine forms in German which can be used for both sexus-feminine and sexus-masculine are further examples, e.g.: "Jeder hat es gelesen." >> sex-masc and sex-fem "Jede hat es gelesen." >> only sex-fem. The (gender)masculine form in German does not encode sexus, more than that, it is underspecified with respect to it.
subjunctive (I and II)
As far as I know: Konjunktiv I und Konjunktiv II are named "present subjunctive" and "past subjunctive" respectively. I am not sure if this terminology is familiar to the English speakers.
f being a murderer is expressed as beingpossible or probable.
of beeing a murderer is expressed as being possible or probable, but not as being true properties of the modified noun.
(43)
To make the point of syncretism (and not of "portmanteau morphemes") clear, it would be better to give the example pairs that coincide "as (43a) and (43d) and (43c) and (43e) show".
post
italics for emphasis
post
italics for emphasis
adverbs
Singular
notes thatwois a kind of uninflectedrelative pronoun and remarks that this description runs contrary to the use of this termfor nominal, that is inflectional, elements.
This sentence is slightly confusing.
behaves exactly like the corresponding adverbs
"... shows the same syntactic distribution", it does not behave exactly in morphological ways.
Conjunctions
This paragraph does not build a sense-unit with the example before, and should be therefore indented, similar to the next paragraph beginning with Interjections.
above
The number of the example would be helpful
optimal
Italics would help to understand that "optimal" is used here as an example.
Tense (
Perfect has not been taken into account, I guess because it is an analytic form(?)
n the case that adverbs and prepositions cannot be assigned to a particular class,then adverbs are normally used as a kind of “left over” category in the sense that allnon-inflecting words, which are neither prepositions, conjunctions nor interjections, areclassed as adverbs
This paragraph is slightly confusing
adjectives have comparative and superlative forms:
adjectives have positive, comparative and superlative wordforms
One should avoid
The terms ... are not adequate, since...
person (1., 2., 3.)
without "."
scientific grammars
in scientific linguistic work
subdivded
subdivided
a
an
a
an
collapsed together
coincide
F
(F), (M), (N): Glosses of features in the stem are in the book normally marked with a period (.F, .M, .N)
event variable for the typeevent
redundant
Larson as-sumes that the littlevcontributes a causative semantics
A minor point: The idea of causative light verbs was not used by Larson 1988. (I think it started in Hale & Keyser 1993.) Larson also didn't use the term 'little v' (I am not sure, but I think that term was introduced in Chomsky's black book).
of the featuredouble slash
Double slash is introduced more thoroughly around p.305. I would consider introducing it more thoroughly on p.284, or at least putting a comment that you are going to discuss it more fully on p. 305.
as well as those who assume that the noun formsthe head of the phrase
--> while others assume that the noun is the head of the phrase. Ich würde auch Bruening hier zitieren, da du ihn schon in der Bibliographie hast. Ich würde hier auch den Begriff "DP" bzw. "DP hypothesis" einführen, da der Begriff "DP" später auftaucht.
mention
mentioned
theory, which
The comma makes this have a non-restrictiveinterpretation (it is billed both as a theory and as being able to explain all languages). The expression "can explain all languages" might be better as 'is applicable to all languages'.
showed
claimed; his arguments were eventually shown to be without force
One has to therefor
One must therefore
e valency has be encoded twice
has TO be (bzw. must be)
feature
plural
Neg head,
I don't know if you say it elsewhere, but Neg heads bother me in that they require non-local selection. The intermediate Neg projection doesn't interfere with the strict sequence of auxiliaries and their ability to determine the inflectional fom of the V/Aux immediately below them (He might not have been being interviewed, He might have not been being interviewed etc.). One could use the Minimalist device of Agree to make sure that each Aux probes down to the next lowest V and alters its form. The probe could get past Neg, so that part of the problem disappears. But something would have to guarantee the correct order of English auxilaries, which in English is invariable. If we appeal to the Cinque hierarchy to predict that, we get problems like (a) the need to have several different Neg positions (e.g. for these seen in the examples above and (b) what to do with languages like German, where we get alternations of the type "er kann das gemacht haben" vs. "er hat das machen können". (I think there was an explicit claim that the Pollock theory of Neg requires non-local selection in Thomas Ernst 1992 "Phrase structure of English negation" in Linguistic REview).
This problem can be solved either
It might perhaps be worth mentioning that the problem for (12) does not exist if one assumes the DP hypothesis.
A theory, which assumes these kind
delete comma, since it is not true that if there is a theory, it will assume that kind of structure.
setup
test
support
Ebene1
access
open access
Complete
test
Abstract
first version
left
test
Tuesday
test
Jack
17.9.2015
down
ü?öÖä{}@
general comment
give
Ebene1
üd
Ebene1
z
Ebene1
hör
Ebene1neu
May
test
If
test
transformational
test
e linear combination of units) were not ex- cluded from the scope of phonology. Since its
test
atio
test
argument
test
intuition
test
rule
test
n on various grammatical theories, Müller fills what was a major gap in the literature.” Karen Lehmann, Zeitschrift ür Rezen- sionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft, 2012 “Stefan Müller’s recent introductory textbook, “Grammatiktheorie”, is an as- tonishingly comprehensive and insightful survey for beginning students of the present state of syntactic theory.” Wolfgang Sternefeld und Frank Richter, Zeit- schrift ür Sprachwissenschaft, 2012 “This is the kind of work that has been sought after for a while. [...] The im- partial and objective discussion offered by the author is particularly refreshing.” Werner Abraham, Germanistik, 2012
Umrandungen
e str
test
in Lang
test
Cangemi
author
6. Suprasegmental conditioning factors 2.4.7. Posit
c5test
nding is not consistent with the hypothesis that temporal information is part of representations
D8
by
m15
s6
c15
turning
m14
tonation. This finding is not consistent with the hypothesis that temporal information is part of representations for intonational categories, contra H2 as well. Response times are only slightly higher when intonation is made ambiguous,
c14
ects in subjects’ responses due to the availability of intonationally unambiguous stimuli. That is, listeners’ at
D7
s5
D6
s4
ntonation (bXfQdX), with ambiguous intonation (bXfAdX)61 and with statement intonation (bXfSdX). Temporal manipu
c11
stimuli with incongruous information (bXfQdS and bXfSdQ). Absence of a significant effect of temporal manipulations on b
m10
eover, if duration was a secondary (compared to f0 contour) prosodic cue to sentence modality contrasts, we would expect a stronger effect of tempo manipulation when intonation is ambiguous (bXfAdQ vs bXfAdA vs bXfAdS: see
c10
D5
m9
pulations is stronger if melodic information is made ambiguous or unavailable. The fact that our resynthesis procedure only yielded stimuli with acoustically (and not perceptually) ambiguous melodic information does not allow us to draw definitiv
d4
m8
simplifying
m7
D3
c4
m4
w that durational patterns might cue sentence modality contrasts. That is, meaning which is not lexical, yet non paralinguisti
d2
particular
m3
r to such phonological entities, which were assumed to bridge between durational differences (on the substantive side
c1
stimulus
m2
utterance
m1
'We've tried that before, and nobody would take you,' said his mother; 'we must sell Milky-white and with the money start a shop, or something.'
test1
features
Zweiter Versuch in footnotes
abstractionist approach
comment on abstractionist approach
however, the establishment of phonological forms
kommentar unten
lationsh
test4
s will be
test3
mbination of only two tones, labelled as High (H) or Low (L). Intonation contours consist of a string of tonal events
test2
rn, serves as the input for the stage of phonetic implementation, ultimately generating an output which is comparable with
test1
erates
test4
s mainly
comment ganz hinten
new note ohne markierung
nother l
test