What the main idea the film is representing .

It concludes that how they was before with the destructive woman or mother, make them hard to bond together.

here shows that ideology, it look like she was allowing them pull her from table or as she explain laughed out of embarrassment but actually it is talk about sacrifices Conrad to a so-called feminine sense of propriety

Formalism, focused on this scene.

Shows he have no statu in front of her mother, shrink from her gaze, being small and less importance.

The mother being picky and provoked something fro Conrad.

This action of mother make this scene atmosphere being worse and show how bewilderment the mother id.

Negatively characterization of mother, make her kid rather stay in mental hospital than the "normal"life, and and how it Comad feel when he/she is told to back home to eat.

after reading 102 and 03, it is talk about the female in male perspective, how bewilderment the women is,, ruin their life, "honest" look of women.

It is kind of connect to "auteur" approach linked to the director because it is what the scene, in what angle the director want us(audience) to see

this scene will be formalism because it focused on the mob and not the outside objects.

It is a good way to think about it and here point out that. So when I read through now, the only thing i thought is this man is bad, insanity but didn't think he will be the victim of the society and make he this way.

Makes me feel like he have bipolar disorder, have different exterior ad interior. Scary!!

ideology approach also shows here, also later we will know that people will see the reelection of the Hitler

give the historical unique moment of German culture show historical approach

it show ideology because the reflection of German society is what the direct want us to see from different perspective of the scene.

Here shows national cinema, it was appeal different countries, so we need to understand the background of the culture.

Genre of the film-- suspenseful and horrifying

And these movie The Sound of Music, The English Patient, it is a more entertainment movie when we see the movie, but there is something implicit thing the author want to talk to us, the politics.

1 Formalist approach--might analyze the representation of an image of the variations of light and shadow within the film. 2 Historical approach--might show how those lighting patterns can be linked to Lang's beginning in the German expressionist period 3 "auteur" approach-- which is believed on the belief that film can be linked through the style of the director. "auteur"-a filmmaker whose personal influence and artistic control over a movie are so great that the filmmaker is regarded as the author of the movie. 4 ideological approach--trying to pinpoint what is the message or messages a film aim to communicate about its word and by implication our world. 5 Genre-- classifying films in terms of common patterns of form and content. 6 National cinema-- need have cultural background and knowing of the society of certain to analyze and help to explain narrative or else in the films..

Given example for ideological approach, the filmmaker are avoid limiting themselves from the content of a move instead sophisticated ideological criticism relate questions about character and plot to more complex point about the shape of the narrative or the distance of the camera from the characters. Like the Feminist study, it will need to investigate then to show the feminist, when people watch this kind of film, they will think deeply that how the Female was changed through the history and think how women is today.

It is like we need to think while we watching a film, because the way the film shows us are have different perspective, one way we see might be entertainment, funny, but they might want to reveal something.

It is interesting to know that our essay that is purely formalist, it is true, I never thought that before, because the essay is one person made it and to development the essay, find evidence and analyze, and when someone read the essay, it is all about my idea I want to represent.

Formalism is more focused in a scene because like the Rebel Without a Cause, James Dean's first experience when he meet the Natalie wood, even this description make me already image how he seen. It is an insightful scene bring the attention to the girl's beauty.

Auteur can identify differently by people, time and place, also auteur is more like make audience to notice how the director create his work, how film interested you, and auteur approach is for people to discover more of a director s film work not the private personal life of the director.

It is mostly wide accepted approach.

I think it is interesting to know that a genres changes with the time, like some movie, it can be horror, but there will have certain scene will be funny.

It is a generic tradition film

Genre is a category for classifying films in terms of common patterns of form and content.

We need have cultural background and knowing of the society of certain to analyze and help to explain narrative or else in the films.. (ex: analyze Russia films (Alexander Dovzhenko's Arsenal) and Indian film(Satyajit Ray, Distant Thunder) ) because portray of a movies different for each country and culture.

Here, the author explain the historical approach by given example of William Fox's experience, how his experience with the movie, from only nine were nominated in the "Best movie" to controlled the production of Fox and MGM studio before the stock market crashed.

More widely use historical approach, and it is more investigate films according to their place within a historical context and in light of historical development and this type of film will have little to do with analyze but concentrate almost exclusively on historical fact and complexities.

It is a noir tragedy film directed by Fritz Lang.

noir means a genre of crime film or fiction characterized by cynicism, fatalism, and moral ambiguity.

Shows that Hall want to use the example to connect to the Saussure and Foucault's theory and then connect back into what Hall want us to know about representation.

Foucault talk about how discourse was work here and yes, it is right, because the way the paint is painted, and the perspective of painting is what the artist want to represent to us. Also it show signifer and signified here, because people need to look, to know it is a painting and have further thought about it.

It is give contextualization, because it gives a little background of the painting. Also the royal couple reflected in the mirror gives a deep meaning and some history behind it that we need to think and discover.

Show the connection between subject and power. Subject is what is exist in the world and the power is we, people can give meaning to individual object , make the object more historical through times.

this is when Hall explores that how Foucault's idea was evolved by the "turn to language"and his idea was related to constructionist, gives evidence for Hall because it is what also Hall' idea was related to because Hall is support that the idea that people are giving meaning to the world.

It show that they do not give a specific word to the meaning and knowledge within discourse, use linguistic and physical to describe it with in linguistic and physical.

" Already in Roland Barthes work in the 1960s, as we have seen Saussure's "linguistic" model is developed through its application to a much wider field of signs and representations It created an argument that Saussure's theory is influenced by Poland Barth and later Foucault's theory is influenced by Saussure..

" it force us to look language itself ,and not just as an empty, transparent, "window on the world." I think it is good, because we do not really pay attention to language itself, just seen as a communication tool, we should look more into language itself. Like when I look at Chinese word, a word can be separate in different part, and different radical create meaning for the word.

Here the first sentence, it show that even the people with same culture need to share the concept map, reflect it will be more essential to share with different concept map because the difference.

given example for signifier and signified, better understand the term

This example shows that Foucault's theory， better helps Hall to explain how language is regulated in different times and although the meaning changes over time but there is nothing wrong with it,

It gives meaning and example for semiotic approach. And I also have my understand on it, like American flag, it is not just a flag represent the country, but also means the American dream and freedom.

Saussure's main idea is represented by this two words, signifier and signified. Signifier is what we all get the same idea, like when we see a toy and we can identified it is a teddy bear , but signified is different, because people think differently, some people will think it is for kids to play, some may think others.

I feel it, because language of color is not just what is represented, red, green or yellow. It can symbolize more things, red can be stop when it goes with traffic, also can be angry when it goes with emotion.l

It can show that before Hall said people speak same language also need to share because people represent things in different ways, like snow, like in American way, we usually describe snow is frazzil ice, no matter snow is big or small; but in Canadian it also can describe as this table 1.1 more detailed way ilike blowing is piqtuluk, lying on a surface is apun.

I think they are important in terms of the rhetorical situation, because if we are not compare the word and not share the word, we will never knew that the concept of tree and Arbre are the same thing although we have same concept. Also shows that Hall is engage us to share

It is connect to Hall, because Hall believe that people are making meaning to the world.