I think tension is what keeps a story engaging, and the three-act structure helps build and release that tension in a meaningful way. The first act sets up the world and introduces conflicts, the second act deepens the struggle and raises stakes, and the third act brings resolution. This structure keeps the audience invested, making the payoff feel satisfying and earned.

I see design as more than just creating things—it’s a powerful tool for sustaining, healing, and empowering our communities. It helps us challenge and break free from exploitative and oppressive systems, shaping a future that is more just and inclusive. When used intentionally, design can be a force for real change.

I think the third and final paradigm we’ll discuss is analytical, focusing on systematic reasoning and data-driven decision-making. This approach emphasizes logic, structure, and measurable outcomes to evaluate problems and solutions. It helps ensure clarity and objectivity in complex discussions.

I think critique relies on a combination of intuition, expertise, and judgment to provide meaningful insights. It goes beyond simple evaluation by considering both objective analysis and subjective perspectives. A well-executed critique helps refine ideas, improve designs, and drive more effective decision-making.

I think computers are fundamentally functional machines, operating based on input, output, and algorithms that determine how inputs are processed into outputs. This structured approach allows them to perform complex tasks efficiently and consistently. Understanding these principles helps in designing better software and optimizing computational processes.

I believe the fastest and easiest form of prototype is a sketch. It allows me to quickly visualize ideas and make rapid iterations without investing too much time or resources. Sketching helps me explore different concepts early in the design process before refining them further.

I think the most crucial aspect of the survey process is crafting questions that effectively capture the public’s opinions, experiences, and behaviors. Well-designed questions ensure reliable data and meaningful insights, making them essential for drawing accurate conclusions. A poorly worded or biased question can lead to misleading results, ultimately affecting the validity of the entire survey.

I think this explanation of competitive analysis is clear and highlights its strategic importance. Understanding not just the features and functions but also the user experience and emotions tied to competitor products is crucial. This helps identify gaps and opportunities to create a product that better meets user needs.

I agree that "user-friendly" is an imprecise phrase because it lacks clarity and can mean different things to different people. Instead of relying on vague terms, it’s more productive to define specific criteria, like ease of navigation, accessibility, or intuitiveness, when evaluating or critiquing a design. Clear, precise language not only fosters better communication among designers but also leads to more thoughtful and effective design solutions.

I think creativity is a combination of both innate ability and learned skill. While some people might have a natural inclination toward creative thinking, it’s also something that can be nurtured through practice, exposure to diverse ideas, and problem-solving experiences. The "mystical" aspect of creativity often comes from how unpredictable and spontaneous it can feel, but tools like brainstorming, mind mapping, and collaboration can help anyone tap into their creative potential.

Defining scenarios can help us better understand how users might interact with a product or system in real-life situations, allowing designers to anticipate needs and challenges. By creating detailed scenarios, we can explore different contexts and perspectives, ensuring that the design is practical, inclusive, and adaptable. It leads to more user-centered solutions that effectively address real-world problems and improve overall user experiences.

I think this statement is very true because design is not limited to creating physical products or visuals; it’s about problem-solving and improving. Anyone who plans and takes action to make things better is engaging in design, no matter they're developing a new app, organizing a community even. This broad perspective on design emphasizes creativity and intentionality in making positive changes in the world.

I think good design is something that not only looks appealing but also serves a meaningful purpose and solves problems effectively. It should prioritize user needs, be accessible to diverse groups, and align with human values to create a positive impact. Good design combines functionality and aesthetics to enhance user experiences.

I agree with this sentence: I think considering human values is one of the most important things while designing, as it ensures that technology aligns and satisfies with the needs of people. Reflecting on the examples provided, I find out how that design can be viewed from multiple perspectives. For instance, framing a pizza delivery app as a tool for elderly independence highlights the potential for designs to empower marginalized groups, while the TSA example underscores the need for critical reflection on the societal and political implications of design choices.

That's what I was thinking in high school. I thought design was just all about fashion, clothes, shoes, and aesthetics. Then I realized design is about anything you create that can be helpful to this world, whether it's a tool, a system, or even a way of thinking. This perspective shift helped me appreciate how design shapes our interactions with technology, solves complex problems, and impacts society on a deeper level.