I find it interesting that people often use these examples while explaining why women are not fit for rulership, but why can't women then use examples of why men can't be rulers also? Men are emotional, they just express their emotions in violence and anger rather than crying, so Hitler is a good example. Can't the same argument against women be made against men?

When looking at these quotes from non-feminist historians, how is it that the argument of women having their own separate history doesn't concern men? Is this only in conversation with Western History, especially the US? I can think of multiple women throughout history that heavily impacted Western culture in Europe, the first one off the top of my head being Cleopatra of Egypt and her involvement with the Roman Empire.

I see this is modern day American, following with the feminist movement and with the LGBTQ+ movement, especially concerning Trans individuals. It is interesting to see that the overall pushback against the idea of gender and sex has stayed the same, but now in modern day, it seems to be benefitting more people when we understand that gender is a social construct.