5 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2019
    1. MANY congratulations! Your literary work is way over my head, so I can't comment on how well deserved it is on a purely literary basis; but I can't think of anyone who has done for the humanities more generally, or who is more richly deserving of the award.

  2. Jan 2016
    1. Taylor, Michael P., Paul Upchurch, Adam M. Yates, Mathew J. Wedel and Darren Naish. In press. Sauropodomorpha. In Kevin de Queiroz, Philip D. Cantino and Jacques A. Gauthier (eds.), Phylonyms: a Companion to the PhyloCode. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Taylor, Michael P., Paul Upchurch, Adam M. Yates, Mathew J. Wedel and Darren Naish. In press. Sauropoda. In Kevin de Queiroz, Philip D. Cantino and Jacques A. Gauthier (eds.), Phylonyms: a Companion to the PhyloCode. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

      These have been in press since May 2007. It's pretty ridiculous.

    2. Published Papers

      These are mostly peer-reviewed, unlike the "Popular Press" articles listed below. But the distinction between peer-reviewed and not isn't as sharp as we'd like to think: for example, the MTE paper on diversity was reviewed by the handling editor, but not be separately solicited referees: should that count?

    3. pneumatic hiatuses

      This is a term that Matt Wedel proposed, with the idea that when they are found they provide evidence for multiple origins of pneumaticity.