5 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2020
    1. After reading through Fannie Lou Hamer's Testimony I give her so much credit and praise to have the courage to write her Testimony the way that she did. She had the courage to stand up for what was right. The only thing that her and the other wanted to do was to be able to Vote and become first class citizens. As she continued down entailing every terrible detail of the treatment both her and others endured during this time it made me really wonder why people who have authority would be getting away with the things that they did. Charging a man for driving the wrong color bus, making them wait in the bus and only allowing 2 people at a time to take the Literacy test. To me from August 31st 1962 to June 9th 1963 I cant help to think that these men did the things that they did because they did not want to come to terms with African American men and women are smarter then what they give them credit. they used force and fear to Manipulate them. They even beat people to death and no one ever found out about the terrible awful Crimes committed against people like you and I. They are no different and we all bleed the same. I don't blame her for questioning America as the land of the free and home of the brave because every day she had to wake up and wonder. Is this the day i am going to die?

    1. Now, my friends, if you were off on an island where there were 100 lunches, you could not let one man eat up the hundred lunches, or take the hundred lunches and not let anybody else eat any of them. If you did, there would not be anything else for the balance of the people to consume.

      I like how he uses the example of lunches in this section. to me he is basically saying the none of use would let one man eat up everything while other stood by starting. he is stating that we all have morals at some point and that our morals would not allow this to happen while other people stand by starving when there was clearly enough food to feed more then one man.

    2. Every man a king, so there would be no such thing as a man or woman who did not have the necessities of life, who would not be dependent upon the whims and caprices and ipsi dixit [unproved assertion] of the financial barons for a living. What do we propose by this society? We propose to limit the wealth of big men in the country. There is an average of $15,000 in wealth to every family in America. That is right here today.

      I think that what Heuy long is trying to say in his speech that every man is a king with in his family and that with them being a king comes no need to be going without the necessities of life while others do not have to worry. That he comes up with a solution of limiting the amount of wealth anyone person can have so that everyone can have some type of money to their family name and there be no division and everyone is on one equal playing field and we are able to limit our countries poverty.

    1. Easily the most striking thing in history of the American Negro since 1876 is the ascendancy of Mr. Booker T. Washington. … Mr. Washington represents in Negro thought the old attitude of adjustment and submission; but adjustment at such a peculiar time as to make his programme unique. This is an age of unusual economic development, and Mr. Washington’s programme naturally takes an economic cast, becoming a gospel of Work and Money to such an extent as apparently almost completely to overshadow the higher aims of life. Moreover, this is an age when the more advanced races are coming in closer contact with the less developed races, and the race-feeling is therefore intensified; and Mr. Washington’s programme practically accepts the alleged inferiority of the Negro races. Again, in our own land, the reaction from the sentiment of war time has given impetus to race-prejudice against Negroes, and Mr. Washington withdraws many of the high demands of Negroes as men and American citizens. In other periods of intensified prejudice all the Negro’s tendency to self-assertion has been called forth; at this period a policy of submission is advocated. In the history of nearly all other races and peoples the doctrine preached at such crises has been that manly self-respect is worth more than lands and houses, and that a people who voluntarily surrender such respect, or cease striving for it, are not worth civilizing.

      As I read on down to Mr W.E.B DuBois I found his stance to be the complete opposite as Mr. Washington. Although I feel like he was not trying to discredit Mr. Washington he was trying to state that his approach to the ongoing Civil rights movement was very outdated and he believed that the African American community needed to stand up for what they believed as right. I believe that he saw that this outdated movement of trying to peacefully win their civil rights was not working and they now needed to take an even bigger stance and stand up for what was right and not "be submissive," as how Mr. Washington had stated in the beginning.

    2. o those of the white race who look to the incoming of those of foreign birth and strange tongue and habits of the prosperity of the South, were I permitted I would repeat what I say to my own race: “Cast down your bucket where you are.” Cast it down among the eight millions of Negroes whose habits you know, whose fidelity and love you have tested in days when to have proved treacherous meant the ruin of your firesides. Cast down your bucket among these people who have, without strikes and labour wars, tilled your fields, cleared your forests, builded [sic] your railroads and cities, and brought forth treasures from the bowels of the earth, and helped make possible this magnificent representation of the progress of the South. Casting down your bucket among my people, helping and encouraging them as you are doing on these grounds, and to education of head, hand, and heart, you will find that they will buy your surplus land, make blossom the waste places in your fields, and run your factories. While doing this, you can be sure in the future, as in the past, that you and your families will be surrounded by the most patient, faithful, law-abiding, and unresentful people that the world has seen. As we have proved our loyalty to you in the past, nursing your children, watching by the sick-bed of your mothers and fathers, and often following them with tear-dimmed eyes to their graves, so in the future, in our humble way, we shall stand by you with a devotion that no foreigner can approach, ready to lay down our lives, if need be, in defence of yours, interlacing our industrial, commercial, civil, and religious life with yours in a way that shall make the interests of both races one. In all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress.

      As I read through this section a few times it was almost like Booker T. Washington was pleading for African Americans to be accepted. i felt like he was trying to show them and convince them of how much good they brought to the "white race." I kinda of felt that he was disregarding everything that everyone had stood up for and was saying please lend your helping hand but was also saying to the African American lets do this peacefully and maybe just maybe they will reach out their hand to us as we have done for them in their lives and with their families. This passage kind of made me feel like he wanted them to give up what they have been fighting for this entire time and "be the bigger person and ask for them to be treated equal. he wanted unity without the fight and the suffrage and people dying.