8 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. (C) Editing results for hosts infected at an MOI or 0.1 or 1 by λ-DART phages containing a nontargeting or thyA-targeting guide with DART components driven by a lac or J23119 promoter.

      lac and thyA fail at 1 MOI but J23119 and thyA succeeds at 1 MOI. Why does thyA help mitigate the toxicity effects with only J23119? I theorize it has something to do with the higher baseline expression levels of J23119 compared to lac. Because lac is inducible, any gene driven by it will take some time after induction to ramp up while any gene driven by J23119 is always highly expressed.

    2. (B) Editing results for host cells infected at an MOI of 1, 10, or 100 by λ-DART phages expressing lacZ-targeting DART driven by a lac or J23119 promoter.

      Interesting that the MOI has no impact of the efficacy of the edit with the lac promoter. Additionally, the variability at 10 MOI for lac is extreme, it seems like a large portion of them outright failed. What is it about lac that prevents increasing the MOI from increasing the efficiency? What is it about lac that causes such a high variability for lac 10 MOI?

    3. (B) Edited fraction data determined after HR and subsequent enrichment (HR+E) of the intended deletion edits. The size of the deleted region is listed in parenthesis. (C) Edited fraction data determined after homologous recombination (HR) and subsequent enrichment (HR+E) of the intended lacZ insertion edits.

      Cas13a being used its intended way (to destroy a virus) as part of an experimental screening is interesting. I wonder what applications the Cas proteins have while serving their native functions.

    4. B) Editing results for host cells infected at an MOI of 10 by λ-DART phages containing a nontargeting or lacZ-targeting guide with DART components driven by a J23119 promoter.

      An edited population percent of ~0.005% is a pretty low efficiency. That is 1/20,000 cells. Is this sufficient for downstream applications? The specificity is good though. Perhaps increase the efficiency may cause an increase in off target effects.

  2. Aug 2026
    1. (B) Protospacer 4 target DNA duplexes (labeled at both 5′ ends) containing WT and mutant PAM motifs were incubated with Cas9 programmed with tracrRNA:crRNA-sp4 (nucleotides 23 to 89). At the indicated time points (in minutes), aliquots of the cleavage reaction were taken and analyzed as in Fig. 1B.

      Contrary to Cas9's moderate tolerance for mismatches in the crRNA, it does not seem to tolerate mismatches in the PAM site very well. This would be beneficial to the bacteria as leniency with PAM sites could open the door for self targeting. For biotechnology applications, this would be a benefit as it would contribute towards the ability to precisely control where Cas9 is cutting.

    2. ) Plasmids containing WT and mutant protospacer 2 inserts with varying extent of crRNA-target DNA mismatches (right) were cleaved in vitro by programmed Cas9 (left). The cleavage reactions were further digested with XmnI. The 1880- and 800-bp fragments are Cas9-generated cleavage products. M, DNA marker.

      Cas9 can tolerate a reasonably high degree of mismatch, demonstrating some cleavage with up to 6bp of mismatch (notably, position matters and this is the first 6bp of the guide RNA). This would be useful as it allows the bacteria to potentially overcome minor phage mutations. For biotechnology applications however, this means extra caution must be taken when designing guide RNA. Off-target cleavage is a real concern.

    3. Cas9 cleaves both linearized and supercoiled plasmids (Figs. 1A and 2A)

      The ability to cleave a supercoiled plasmid would be essential to the current modern day applications of CRISPR. Genomic DNA is often naturally supercoiled, specifically, the majority of the human genome is supercoiled around histones. Bacteria's genomic DNA is also supercoiled. If a CRISPR system is only effective on linear DNA its real world applications would fall short.

    4. We found that mature crRNA alone was incapable of directing Cas9-catalyzed plasmid DNA cleavage (Fig. 1A and fig. S3A). However, addition of tracrRNA, which can pair with the repeat sequence of crRNA and is essential to crRNA maturation in this system, triggered Cas9 to cleave plasmid DNA (Fig. 1A and fig. S3A).

      tracrRNA is essential for the guide RNA to properly interface with the Cas9 protein complex. Without it, the crRNA is unable to interact with the Cas9 protein and cannot be used to find a specific sequence. This states the critically of both parts of guide RNA to the functioning of a CRISPR system as a whole.