2 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Regardless of what commitments we make, the public deserves to know what is going on.

      Common Good Lens: While companies have the right to choose whether to be transparent with the public or not, this does buttheads with the common good lens. The public deserves companies that will be honest with them, especially when it comes to fast development in technology. AI affects everyone, and not everyone understands it. Society would benefit from having open communication from companies, especially with something as huge as AI.

    2. Left unchecked, it could outrun our ability to understand and control these systems, and so must be pursued very carefully, if at all.

      Right Lens: When looking at it through the right lens, many rights will be at stake. AI companies and their employees risk forms of scrutiny, while workers and creators risk losing jobs that could have Ai advancements replace them. Entire communities could risk their rights to clean and safe water, heating, and financial services if too-advanced AI systems fail or are misused. An AI company does have the right to expose the public to risks since it could give the company beneficial outcomes when it comes to public opinion. The companies have the right to choose to share information and risks and how much of it they do share, but the public also has the right to demand information as well. A company can choose not to share, but the public still can want those answers and information, especially when there are the potential for risks.