2 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Classical bibliographical databases have in general lostimportance compared with Internet search engines. It istoday an open question whether, for example, the tradi-tional thesaurus still has a role to fill in modern informa-tion retrieval (see Dextre Clarke and Vernau 2016). Hjør-land (2015a) argued however, that for serious scholarlypurposes it is important that users or intermediaries areable to control the search process. For such tasks, classi-cal databases seem to be the most advanced tools.

      This is interesting. I like the encouragement/reinforcement of using all the tools at your disposal to retrieve information, not just search engines. I find depending on how niche the subject is, classical databases are certainly the way to go. You can't count on everything being digitized/archived online into an accessible database yet!

    2. However, it is often difficult to reveal what kind of theo-retical assumption guide KOPs. Such processes are oftendone intuitively and some systems have been difficult to re-late to a theory.

      This sort of stuck out to me! In sociology, we learn how external influences and your surroundings affect your internal development and your "inner thoughts" or "inner voice". Two individuals won't have the exact same intuition due to their upbringing and beliefs, which leads me to wonder if that could add a hurdle to relating a single kind of theory to different individual's non-computerized KO methods.