Yes.I strongly recommend that UDL should be multivariate.We should not be locked into a set set of ways of thinking, solutions, and creations.As developers or users, we should think of a variety of scenarios.Improvements or feedback for each situation can help everyone use the right tool.If a tool is only suitable for a single group, then it is not fair.

Teachers might assume that children from affluent families are more likely to have access to online tools.And children from wealthier families are more likely to be able to afford paid software.It's not fair.Under such conditions, students from relatively poor families may not have the opportunity to exert their ability in tool use.I think if the school can provide some free tools and cooperate with some software companies, it can help students from poor families to get access to more new technologies, and let them use their special skills.

I love that idea.Even if not all teachers are skilled in developing and using tools, they can evaluate the tools they use.This is helpful for developers, who may not have access to the teaching process, so they don't know how to improve the tools to make them the most effective.Teachers can give feedback, and developers can improve and re-create tools based on those ideas.

I agree with both proposals.Scientific and technological progress should be presupposed by fairness.We don't want a new tool to exacerbate social inequality. It's a tool that makes society regressive.Creating inclusive tools can advance the process of social justice.These tools can be helpful culturally, institutionally and personally.

Yes.This is an obvious phenomenon.For exams like math, our professors often ask us to turn on the camera.The professor even told us that his machine could detect the number of times a person looked up, the position of their eyes, their activity on the test page, and so on.It's amazing to me.Technology can be monitored from a distance.Even if I am in China and the professor is in the United States, the professor can use computer tools to check my browsing history during the exam.It's a very effective invigilator tool.

I quite agree with that. Everyone has different skills. For people with disabilities, language learners and others, many factors may limit their academic development. And technology is a solution. People can help people solve their needs by developing new tools, apps, etc. Grammarly, for example, I think is very helpful for English learners.

I really like this tool. It makes all the resource pretty organized. We can choose our favorite covers, typography, etc., and then upload files or share links.Also, we can combine different types of resources into the same folder.I usually create a different folder for each of the different classes so that all the relevant materials are clear.

I agree with this.There are many websites that sell personal information.The phone numbers, addresses, etc. that we put in when we sign up for an account are likely to be sold by Internet companies.It makes people feel very unsafe.I think the country should strengthen supervision and create some network inspection system to punish this kind of behavior

I totally agree with this point.I've noticed that there are a lot of sites that need Flash support. But individual users need to spend extra money to buy Flash software. This can incur some additional costs or affect the site's viewing rate. If a web designer can create a web page with some commonly supported plugins, it will attract more visitors.

I totally agree with this point.I've often noticed that some of the most famous websites have very simple homepages. Navigation bars are usually at the top or on both sides, making them easy for all visitors to notice. The clear page design makes people feel more comfortable when browsing. Many web designers try to personalize their sites by adding many elements at once, such as large areas of color and too many information bars. For example, I once saw a website with a blue background and a dozen information boxes including video, audio, and text boxes on one page. The layout makes me feel dizzy. I think it would look better if the designer could reduce a few elements

Agree with that.Like our Remote Class. Some classes require me to turn on the camera, and my camera just broke. This made it impossible for me to meet the requirements of that class. Some classes just require me to be present. Microphones and cameras are not required. It's easier for me. The same is true for web pages. If a web page requires too many tools, some people may have trouble using it. I once visited a website that required Adobe Flash to watch videos, and my Flash software had not been updated, which prevented me from continuing to view the page

This is my favoraite part. Besides Feedly, there are plenty of other online tools could do this, such as Instagram. They will recommend more relevant information based on the content I'm interested in, which will attract me to spend more time on the site and even stumble upon a lot of useful information. This is pretty helpful when I'm interested in something but don't know what keywords to search for. In the future, when I find materials for my essay, I think I will try to use Feedly.