32 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2021
    1. It has been devised that the Pope, bishops, priests, and monks are called the spiritual estate; princes, lords, artificers, and peasants, are the temporal estate. This is an artful lie and hypocritical device, but let no one be made afraid by it, and that for this reason:

      I agree with this. From what Im understanding, Luther is saying that throughut the Roman society, humans seperated each other by class and important. If this is correct I agree when he says that Christians " are truy of the spiritual estate, and there is no differnece among them.."

  2. Aug 2021
    1. Besides that, we are all priests, as I have said, and have all one faith, one Gospel, one Sacrament ; how then should we not have the power of discerning and judging what is right or wrong in matters of faith

      So here is he agreeing that the law should be based on religion or faith?

    2. As for the unction by a pope or a bishop, tonsure, ordination, consecration, and clothes differing from those of laymen-all this may make a hypocrite or an anointed puppet, but never a Christian or a spiritual man.

      Here, I am understanding that he believes the individuals that were "high in class" or "powerul" were not true christians because they have created these standars in society of how different people should look and act, when in the end it should believed that all mankind have one faith and we shouldnt dictate others by class...

  3. Dec 2019
    1. for which the discovery of America paved the way. This market has given an immense development to commerce, to navigation, to communication by land. This development has, in its time, reacted on the extension of industry; and in proportion as industry, commerce, navigation, railways extended, in the same proportion the bourgeoisie developed, increased its capital, and pushed into the background every class handed down from the Middle Ages.

      Yes, the industry opened up when all of the classes were formed. Once the bourgeoisie took over, the low and middle class were the ones producing while the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production.

  4. Nov 2019
    1. etween People and Their Work. The third criterion which contributes to a person's social class is the relationship between that per- son and his or her own productive activity - the type of activity that con- stitute

      when working, whoever controls the most is usually on a higher social class. Business owners, Ceo's, and government officials have one of the highest social class in the US because they have the most control.

    2. ivate ownership of capital. Capital is usually thought of as being derived from physical property. In this sense capital is proper- ty which is used to produce profit, interest, or rent in sufficient quantity so that the result can be used to produce more profit, interest, or rent- that is, m

      Yes, if every different type of social class lives separately then profit will be valued differently. A Lot of the elite white class lives together, making the profit value higher.

    3. One's occupation and income level contribute significantly to one's social class, but they do not define it. Rather, social class is a series of re- lationshi

      Yes a lot of relationships rely on social class. Each social class is usually living together making the schools with the same people ,as well as jobs.

    4. The methods used to gather data were classroom observation; inter- views of students, teachers, principals, and district administrative staff; and assessment of curriculum and other materials in each classroom and schoo

      I feel like to add to the observations, they should of observed the environment around the school. Like the neighborhoods , race, and population.

    5. rk tasks and interaction in each school are presented; then the con- cepts used to define social class are applied to the examples in order to assess the theoretical meaning of classroom events. It will be suggested that there is a ' 'hidden curriculum" in school work that has profound im- plication for the th

      Yes this is very true. Every type of school has different curriculums which can control the tasks and interaction, especially in jobs.

    6. ols in complex industrial societies like our own make available different types of educational experience and cur- riculum knowledge to students in different social

      Yes I agree with the scholars, there are many different types of schools with different types of classes. This creates new experiences and environment.

  5. ithaka-labs.s3.amazonaws.com ithaka-labs.s3.amazonaws.com
    1. in the area in the late 1960s and early 1970s were careful to distinguish one fro

      It is also said that race is not just biology. It is the construct of what individuals in society construct on social perceptions

  6. Oct 2019
    1. hakespearean plays, considered pop culture when they were written, are now part of our society’s high culture. Five hundred years from now, will our descendants associate Breaking Bad with the cultural elite?

      yes the writer brings up a good point. The pop culture we consider today will no longer be pop culture to many generations ahead.

    1. ind if she’d felt the same pressure in school. In 2008, researchers from Johns Hopkins University conducted a series of studies on the effects of bilingual education (Slavin et al. 2008). They found that students taught in both their native tongue and English make better progress than those taught only in English.

      I believe poeple who are bilangual do go through alot more than th eaverage citizen. You grow up with two languages in your head, and two cultures. At home or when im with my family im stck onto the middle eastern culture and when im not nea family or arabs I am using the american culture.

    1. What happens when we encounter different cultures? As we interact with cultures other than our own, we become more aware of the differences and commonalities between others’ worlds and our own.

      The writer clearly shows how culture can take a huge toll on people. Culture is the main reason as to why people function the way they do. When someone is taken from one culture to a completely different one, they are in shock.

    2. To someone raised in New York City, the marriage customs of a family from Nigeria may seem strange or even wrong. Conversely, someone from a traditional Kolkata family might be perplexed with the idea of romantic love as the foundation for marriage and lifelong commitment. In other words, the way in which people view marriage depends largely on what they have been taught.

      Alot of people find arranged marriages as something strange, but the cultures who do arranged marriages find other marriage customs like the ones in new york even more strange.

    1. e may simply say, "Hello!" and ask, "How was your weekend?" or some other trivial question meant to be a friendly greeting. Rarely do we physically embrace or even touch the individual. In fact, doing so may be viewed with scorn or distaste, since as people in the United States we have fairly rigid rules about personal space. However, we all adhere to various rules and standards that are created and maintained in culture.

      Ive realized different ways of greeting is offensive to other cultures. Each culture has their own view of what is acceptable which is interesting.

  7. Sep 2019
    1. They must report findings accurately, even if they contradict personal convictions.

      them trying to put peoples safety at first is very nice. But if information of the participants are anonymous and someone is a criminal does tis really protect peoples safety? it can protect privacy but i don't know about safety.

    2. Investigators are ethically obligated to report results, even when they contradict personal views, predicted outcomes, or widely accepted beliefs.

      Are there any ways or methods sociologists us to avoid bias? Like maybe a lie detector or different methods? what way can sociologists research by receiving the least amount of bias.

    3. without bias or judgment, during the course of a study and in publishing results (1949). Sociologists are obligated to disclose research findings without omitting or distorting significant data.

      I believe not only should the sociologists avoid being bias, but also the people being studied. It is very difficult to avoid bias.

    4. Weber understood that personal values could distort the framework for disclosing study results. While he accepted that some aspects of research design might be influenced by personal values, he declared it was entirely inappropriate to allow personal values to shape the interpretation of the responses.

      Yes I believe true sociologists should put their values to aside. Even if you are not a sociologist and ask for different opinions you can't tell people they are wrong just because they have different outlooks and values than you.

    5. Researchers must obtain participants’ informed consent and inform subjects of the responsibilities and risks of research before they agree to partake.

      cant this change the way people look at the research making them act and answer differently since they know the risks.

    6. Is value neutrality possible? Many sociologists believe it is impossible to set aside personal values and retain complete objectivity. T

      This is very valuable. You cannot learn more if you put your own morals and values aside. There may be people with different values but with same or different opinions. You cant let that get in the way.

    1. he low proportion of the Greek Catholics cannot be surely attributed to religion; for as their civilization is very different from that of the other Euro-pean nations, this difference of culture may be the cause of their lesser apti-tude.

      Sooo.. is the writer saying that suicide is higher in European states?

    2. If one casts a glance at the map of European suicide, it is at once clear that in purely Catholic countries like Spain, Portugal, Italy, suicide is very little de-veloped, while it is at its maximum in Protestant countries, in Prussia, Saxony, Denmark.

      I do believe the more religious a person is, the more they believe suicide is wrong. However, this is not always the case.

    3. At each moment of its history, therefore, each society has a definite apti-tude for suicide. The relative intensity of this aptitude is measured by taking the proportion between the total number of voluntary deaths and the popu-lation of every age and sex

      i believe that different societys and areas throughout the world have different factors towards suicide.

    1. Chaves argues that organized religion occupiesless of Americans'time and exerts less influence on society as a whole thanit did in the past

      yes i agree, time has changed and there is so much diversity now that many people have to accept different beliefs

    2. sociologists who study the institution of religion are documenting thechanges occurring within this social institution. one current deba*te iswhether religiosity is growing in the United states or if it is declining due toincreasing secularization.

      I personally believe it is declining,times are changing

    3. Not leisure and enjoyment, but only activity serves to increase theglory of God according to the definite manifestations of His will.Waste of time is thus the first and in principle the deadliest of sins. Thespan of human'life is infinitely short and precic'rus to make sure of one's ownelection.

      religion has carried and strived people to go further. As the writer writes, religion motivated many to go further because doing nothing to them was a waste of time, which is a "sin".

    4. without the ProtestantReformation and a change in societal valuesJoward rationality, capitalismwould not have evol'u'ed as we know it today

      yes, without the reformation nothing would have changed. The cause towards reformation would be the influence of different religions on people, causing them to create a reformation in my opinion.

    5. y' Max Weber (1864-1920), forexample, often placed the institution of religion at the center of his socialanalyses. Weber was particularly concerned with how changes in the insti-tution of religion influenced changes in other srlcial institutions, especiallythe economy.

      i strongly agree with this idea. I believe religion holds a huge role in influencing society and changed. Not only reliigion but also culture. Religion can also hold a huge factor on government, For example Saudi arabia's governement and laws hugely differ than the ones in America.

    1. In the earlier epochs of history, we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold gradation of social rank. In ancient Rome we have patricians, knights, plebeians, slaves; in the Middle Ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, serfs; in almost all of these classes, again, subordinate gradations.

      social ranking has always existed since the start of time. It is what kept society moving, creating rules