12 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. However, regardless of vote choice, there does seem to be a closeconnection between good health and political participation. Numerous studies have found thata range of illnesses lead to depressed likelihood of voting at the individual and aggregate levels,with the magnitude of effects often similar to or greater than that of traditional predictors (

      Poor health may create another barrier to political participation. When people experiencing illness are less likely to vote, their needs may also be less represented in decisions about health care and public health policies. This shows how health and political participation can influence each other.

    2. It matters not only that (some) people are able to vote, but also who they vote for, whoseinterests their representatives promote in policy, and whether politicians can in fact achieve theirpolicy goals.

      This explains how voting can eventually influence health outcomes through policy decisions. Having the right to vote is important, but the policies supported by elected officials can also determine access to health services, funding, and other resources that affect population health.

    1. Nationaltrends can be measured by using any of these data sources,state trends can be measured by using NVSS and BRFSS,and county trends can be measured by using NVSS.

      Using data at national, state, and county levels helps show how health outcomes may differ depending on the population being examined. For nurses, recognizing these trends can help identify health concerns that may require more focused prevention and community interventions.

    2. “No single measure can capture the health of the nation”(24)

      Population health cannot be fully understood through one measure alone. Looking at life expectancy, mortality rates, disease patterns, and disparities together provides a clearer picture of a population’s health. Using multiple measures can also help identify communities that may need additional resources or targeted interventions.

    1. Global nursing is the use of evidence-based nursing processes to promote sustainable planetary health andequity for all people. Global nursing considers social determinants of health, [and] includes individual andpopulation-level care, research, education, leadership, advocacy, and policy initiatives.

      This passage shows that nursing extends beyond direct patient care. Nurses can influence population health through education, advocacy, research, and policy. Understanding social determinants of health is also important because it helps nurses recognize the barriers that may contribute to health disparities among different populations.

    2. Social determinants of health are additional factors that influence the health of populations, families, andindividuals. Social determinants of health are conditions and social factors that affect outcomes and risk related tohealth, functioning, and quality of life. Conditions or factors in hospitals, clinics, workplaces, homes, towns andcities, schools, and beyond influence health outcomes for the population. Economic stability, education access andquality, health care access and quality, neighborhood and built environment, and social and community context arefive domains that shape the social determinants of health (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion,2022). Please see Social Determinants Affecting Health Outcomes for a comprehensive discussion of socialdeterminants of health

      This section stood out to me because it shows that a person’s health is influenced by much more than medical treatment. Factors such as income, education, access to health care, and the environment can affect health outcomes. As a nurse, understanding these factors is important because patients may face barriers outside of the hospital that affect their ability to follow a treatment plan or maintain their health.

    1. Despite these gains, millions of Americans remain uninsured (see figure 2). Some are eligible forsubsidized coverage via Medicaid or the Marketplaces but have yet to enroll, or have lostcoverage. The Marketplaces offer challenges (i.e. a perceived lack of affordable options). 17Despite subsidies, affordability remains a barrier for some, especially those at the higher end ofincome ranges eligible for subsidies. Others are not eligible for subsidies at all, due to having anaffordable offer of employer insurance, or being part of the “family glitch:” if an employer-sponsored plan satisfied the affordability threshold for that year, the entire family becomesineligible for subsidies, even if a family plan through the employer would cost more than theaffordability threshold.

      This stood out to me because having health insurance options available does not necessarily mean that everyone can afford or access them. Eligibility requirements and the cost of coverage can still leave families without insurance. This shows how the structure of the U.S. health care system can contribute to differences in access to care.

    2. Figure 2. The US Uninsured Population, by Subgroup, 2018

      I found this figure helpful because it shows that people can be uninsured for different reasons rather than one single cause. Some may qualify for assistance but remain unenrolled, while others may not qualify for subsidies. It makes me think about how complicated navigating health insurance can be for patients.

    1. But could health care reform be forever deferred? As long as the ranks of theuninsured continued to grow, the presence of market failure was impossibleto deny, and the door would be left open to calls for universal health care.Furthermore, health care expenditures actually continued to accelerate during the2000s, further weakening the defense of the status quo. As soon became clear,the sort of health care system that neoliberals wanted—a “consumer-driven”system with an abundance of private insurance plans with high out-of-pocketexpenses—wasn’t necessarily mutually exclusive with a system of almost-universal health care.

      I found this interesting because it shows how rising numbers of uninsured people and increasing health care costs created pressure for reform. It also makes me wonder whether expanding insurance is enough if patients still face high out of pocket expenses.

    2. The “consumer-driven health care” movement emerged directly from the“moral hazard” idea that people had to play with their own money when it cameto health care. As told by Jost in Health Care at Risk, its proponents have wonseveral policy achievements in recent decades, some of which were actuallyfirst championed by neoliberal think tanks.

      This stood out to me because making patients responsible for more of their health care costs may encourage careful spending, but it can also make people delay needed care because they cannot afford the out of pocket cost.

    1. Much research has shown that individuals without health insurance are less likely to seekpreventive medical care such as medical checkups (especially Pap smears and mammograms for women,and prostate cancer screening for men) and immunizations and are less likely to see a medical providerwhen sick (or they wait until they are very sick when the benefits of early detection are lost). They areless likely to have a regular source of medical care and are more likely to see a different provider on eachvisit.

      This stood out to me because having insurance affects more than whether a person can pay for care. Without a regular provider, patients may have difficulty receiving consistent follow up and preventive care.I think continuity of care is especially important for patients with chronic conditions because changes in their health may be missed when they repeatedly see different providers.

    2. The lack of personal financial resources to pay for medical care and the lack of health insurance havea profound effect on the health of individuals and families.

      This stood out to me because lack of insurance can affect more than whether a patient can pay a medical bill. It can cause patients to delay preventive care or wait until they are much sicker before seeking treatment. As a nursing student, this makes me think about how access to care can directly affect patient outcomes and health disparities.