offering it wouldever be accused of raking a fatalistic approach to cancer or implying that nothing canbe done about it
People are more cynical about war, than a lot of things
offering it wouldever be accused of raking a fatalistic approach to cancer or implying that nothing canbe done about it
People are more cynical about war, than a lot of things
Nevertheless, no one is prepared to give up on the goal of cancer control.
I really like this attitude, we might not be able to completely stop it, but why not try
n the second half of the twentieth century, an era without a major arstedconflict, at least 50 million people Bled m small wars.
Similar to what we learned about in earlier classes, war has changed, we don't have huge wars as much anymore
This third stage greatly reduced'prejudice and conflict in just a few days;
Again, having a common goal or enemy unites
hey named themselves Eagles and Rattlers, spoke dispar-agingly of each other, and began to react territorially to each other's "incursions."
Without prompting, boys are already competitive
destmction of enemie
Historically, having a common enemy has united groups and nations
A classic experiment in socialpsychology showed that a subject will predictably deny the evidence of his or her per-ception of even something as simple as the relative length of lines if a small group ofothers (confederates of the experimenter) make dear their own denial
We will follow the pack even when we know we are wrong.
illions of people become simul-taneously impressed with one delusion
We don't want to be outcast, we follow the pack, even if we may not of on our own
e reduce this sense of responsibility and its concomitant anxiety by heLvingto a set of rules a ti ' acing oll, -rivp Rulesou ey can become rigid thec-most benign of the three option
Life is terrifying, we want order
Fear, and fear of the strange in particular, is a basic characteristic of nervoussystems
We don't like the unknown, driving us to discriminate agaisnt those different from us
e a physical continuum betweenp and b, but we must make up our minds whichone we are hearing in order to have a language that works
Very interesting point, we need differences to live as a true society
Societies become more complex as their populationincreases, with such features as social stratification, division of labor and taxationplaying increasing roles.
The more complex, the more ideas you have, the more people disagree
"either a man is a kinsman ... or he is a person to whom youhave no reciprocal obligations and whom you treat as a potential enemy
my way or the highway
Even the King refer to themselvesas "the true people" and others as "strange
Everyone wants to think their way of living is correct
. The soldier gets to turn his back on the thousand frstrationsof home life, while elevating his importance in the eyes of his family; to commitfoia time to a purpose that seems pure and clear; to experience t e excite-t:meat martial adventure; to express an cep-seated frustration and WpL.and to achieve the enduring satisfaction and respect far having faced and triumphedivi;s1
It gives a meaning to a mans life, if he sees it that way
threat of natural dis-asters (e.g.; weather or pests) that destroy food supplies
Another proof for resources and scarcity starting wars
"organ-ized" is more important than "violence."
Though said that both words are important, is it really a war if its just two people?
is also associated withattempted murder, rape, arson, and other acts of impulsive aggression that werenot attributable to low intelligence alone.
Being violent can run in families
lending of strains showed that aggressivegenes are dominant, with the young resembling the more aggressive parent
Being aggresive is a dominant strain, im not educated enough to say why this is
Yet at age 10 and inadulthood these girls are psychologically different from their sisters and from unre-lated controls. By their own and their mothers' reports, they play less with dolls,are more "tomboyish," and express less desire to be married and have children whenthey grow up
Maybe being in the womb with testostorone can affect development
Females cradled and cuddled the infant more while males hit the infantmore, and the difference was highly significant
Interesting biological difference
nally, testosterone level)74 helps predict aggressive 1 wetcognitive ability
Lots of testostorone, low level of brain power, most likely violence
steroid treatment, whether of androgen deficient men, nor-mal athletes, or ordinary vo unreers, can increase aggressive tendencies
It sorta plays into the joke of an ultra violent meat head, but its intersting to see it holds up
ale castration
Ouch, and it makes sense it would decrease it
But impulsive aggression does not lead to a stable dominant role.Males must win fights to become dominant, but they must pick them sensibly, whichmeans controlling rage.
Rewarding a smarter violent person
urthermore, drugs direcdyaffecting those neurotransmitters can increase or decrease isolation-induced fighting
Drugs to help mentally ill people, instead of invasive brain surgery
paranoidsymptoms and childhood abuse
childhood abuse being something that happened to them, less something in their brain naturally
lower activity in theleft frontal and temporal lobes reduces inhibition, leading to outbursts of physicalrage
Lower functioning people will be more physically violent, sometimes
ompared to veterans with_otlts larain damage,those with lower frontallobe damage are more likely to have outbursts of rage at family members, friends,and calk ues
More and more evidence for brain damage making people more violent
rare brain tumor that may have chronically irritated his amygdala
even going so far as to driving people to commit insane and senseless acts of violence
brain tumors causing damage to the medial hypothalamus or the sep-tal area have trouble controlling aggression
brain damage can make people more angry and violent
Aggressionrequires the hypothalamus, which inte• aces messa es from other parts of issystem, biasing it toward or away from violence
A lot of complicated brain talk about causing aggression
maternal aggression,
Women can also show aggresiveness as a mother
7-month-olds showed that both aggression and a sex difference in aggres-sion have already emerged by that ag
differences in agression between boys and girls can show up super early in age
5 tribal societies on all continents, menwere more likely to dream of coitus, wife, weapon, animal, death, red, vehicle, hit,ineffectual attempt, and grass,
Men may be more likely to think of violent thoughts, among other things
Fights over adultery or presumedadultery were involved in several cases, and a majority of the others were retaliationsfor previous homicides
Violence over what they believe is a righteous cause
but they killed victims and hunted heads
Though perceived different by western conventions, they still were violent
Yet in all her cultures there was homicidal violence and, in all, that vio-lence was overwhelmingly male
Men seem to be more predisposistioned to violence
When a criticalmass of about 18 males get together, excitement builds until theygo oulTin-difirfor-estill a single filnuirtussally quiet, passing up hunting opportunities along the wayuntil they cross the boundary of their own territory.
Males can excite eachother into violence
it was found that after a society has been pacified by exter-nal powers, it becomes less interested in training boys to be aggressiv
Similar to the idea of constant war if not awed by a power, countries that don't have to fight, will instill less violence in their youth
Culture can reduceviolence
If violence is less accepted culturally, many people will most likely not commit acts of violence
Bur when the British engaged the Semai in counterinsurgency against Communistrebels in the mid-1950s, they became extremely violent:
They weren't a violence society to eachother, but were incredibly violent in times of war, which is interesting
sychological capafIgic
They would've been mental capable of killing, its just they didn't have the means to
They were not observed to have organized groupconflicts in recent times. Nevertheless, their homicide rate matches or exceeds thatfor American cities
There were not times of war perse, but they still had violence
Forty percent of men have killed at least one other man,and those who have killed have demonstrably higher reproductive success than thosewho have not (Chagnon, 1988). Such descriptions of the most violent societies canbe multiplied and give the impression that humans are a very bloody species com-posed of dysfunctional cultures
Incredible amounts of violence (40% of men have killed another) can be found in some civilizations
Many collections of skeletons show embedded projectilepoints, left-sided skull fractures (reflecting blows with weapons in the opponent'sright hand), and parry fractures of the lower arm sustained while warding off suchblows. Burials with weapons and armor are seen in many sites and evidence of forti-fications becomes ubiquitous
People fought with weapons for a very long time
seriously challenged in a cross-cultural study showing that 64percent of such societies had combat between communities or larger entities at leastonce every two years
Hunter Gatheres were most likely violent towards eachother
zechoslovakian cemeteries from roughly the sameperiod show substantial evidence of violent death, perhaps on a large scale. A 20,000-year-old male burial in the Nile Valley had stone projectile points in the abdominalsection and another embedded in the upper arm. Egyptian Nubia shows many moresuch cases in a time frame of 14,000 to 12,000 years ago. And European sites beforethe spread of agriculture to Europe show ample evidence of common violence,including the famed "Iceman" of 5,000 years ago, whose well-preserved body hasan arrow embedded in the upper back.Huma- These violent injuries an- phase of human prehistory,: the respective regions, andin a wide range of huntingHadza, and othersinertly claimed that hunter-1but this claim has been seriopercent of such societies hac...Once every two years (C. R.open to challenge—it incluWho run not serve as a modeof hunter-gatherers has beener'eXidence of warlike behavpaintings in southern Africa,silent spear wounds in 2,00(& Register, 2003, pp. 100--:z. With the Neolithic revol-dence of warfare becomes dParts of the ancient world.points, left-sided skull fract.right hand), and parry fract,'t: blows. Burials with weaponsfications becomes ubiquitoushole of human history sinoa process of relentless, exp:1983). The Neolithic revoltfixed tracts of cultivated lamthe hunter-gatherer baselineCross-Cultural EvicleruWe could suggest an innatviolent societies (Bohannan tbein, 1970): the YanomamoNew Guinea, the equestrian .gols, due Zulu of nineteenth-Reich. Among the traditionlence, and life was largely o.called "the fi erce people" la.1968; Chagnon, 1992). Forand those who have killed hawho have not (Chagnon, 191Abe multiplied and give the itposed of dysfunctional cul
Violence is common and widespread throughout history
eaves no drs,ht that homicidal violence was partof life in our own species beginning at least 27,000 years
Evidence for violence being a part of human nature, not a recent or learned thing
One adult male at this sire has apartially held scar on the top of his left ninth rib caused by a sharp object thrustinto his rhest (Trinkhaus, 1995), probably a deliberate spear wound
Neanderthals most likely killed eachother with weapons.
Ferale coalitions prevent male abuse
Keeping the males in check cause of groups
males fightmuch less severely and never attack females, perhaps due to female coalitions
Closer to human societies
ll socially living animal species exhibit violence. Con-flicts usuall occur ove ce resources such affood, ace, or mating opportunity
Similar to what we talked about earlier in class, lack of resources drive conflict
They survive and reproduce while the others do not. Thus competition is ofthe, essence of living matter.
The basis for surviving is reproducing, and those better at surviving, will more often reproduce
Recognizing that violence is not the same as war,
There may always be violence, but not always war.
will argue that there is in human nature a natural tendency to violence and,tionally, to war, and ifiat thelailure to fully recognize this tendency—a commons`r failure in academic circles—increases the risk
Konner believes there is a natural tendency towards war in humans.