Chat GPT isn't just helpful if used the right way it can help researchers write quicker and how they think about their own skills. This could even encourge any writing habits for improvement.
- Last 7 days
-
rutgers.instructure.com rutgers.instructure.com
-
-
From what I understood of the theory is about how people see themselves on who they want to be, and how they feel about that difference such as self image and to find out who they wanna be and even with their self esteem
-
It seems like the studies are trying to prove to us that AI tools affect researchers feelings about themselves, and technology shapes their behavior even in the future.
-
In this paragraph, instead of looking at plagiarism or anything related to that, the study is relating to people and how ai influences people to think about themselves as real researchers.
-
ChatGPT makes writing easier and more of a cleaner look, especially for people who aren’t native English speakers. But it also makes people worry and start thinking to themselves like “Is this really my work?” or “Am I cheating?” It can be helpful, but also very stressful to one.
Tags
- For non-native English researchers, especially, ChatGPT promises to mitigate linguistic disadvantage by improving grammatical accuracy, coherence, and fluency (Gomes et al., 2023; Sok and Heng, 2023), thus potentially leveling the playing field in the global research arena. Yet this apparent democratization conceals a set of unresolved ethical, epistemic, and identity-based tensions.
- Verbeek’s (2005) Technological Mediation Theory,
- What is largely missing is a sustained inquiry into how generative AI tools reshape researchers’ self-perception, particularly with regard to their professional identity and epistemic legitimacy.
- Recognizing the aforemen- tioned operationalization of researcher identity as a form of self, this study draws on Rogers’s (1981) Self-Concept Theory due to its comprehensive framework which encompasses self-image (how individuals see themselves), ideal self (how individuals aspire to be), and self-esteem (the evaluative aspect of self-con- cept) (see also Birney, 2023; Hattie, 2014). Correspondingly, a researcher’s self-image refers to how they perceive themselves in their academic roles, including their skills, knowledge, and attributes.
Annotators
URL
-