This is a news source that talks about Facebook's data breach and how the data was published to a hacker group's website with lots of information, which wasn't super sensitive, but people most likely would not like being publicly available. The source also talked about how Facebook did not notify the users whose data was breached about this event.

I think this is only a risk if the company you're giving your information to is poorly managed. A majority of people give lots of sensitive information like credit card numbers, text messages, and other important data to Apple, however, they have one of the greatest cyber security teams in the world comparable to the US governments cyber security.

This source covers Spurious relationships; it is a Wikipedia source. It gives the classic example of drownings going up at a similar rate to ice cream sales, even though there is no correlation between the two, and the correlation is really between temperature levels. It also talks about hypothesis testing and linear relationships.

I wasn't able to access my ad profile; however, I did look around a little bit and found all my data for Google applications, like Gmail messages sent, contacts, calendar, drive, and other various applications. I am not too concerned with Google having data on me because it is probably just used in an algorithm along with millions of other users' data.

This is a dictionary site that gives you the audible pronunciation for the UK and US versions of hors d'oevre. It is a very simple site; it just has the word and an audio button next to it, as well as a sound-by-sound pronunciation.

This was suprising too me, but not something I would have expected to happen. I guess I am most surprised that social media or internet sites don't censor this more. This reminds me of the Westboro Baptist Church and how they would mock families at military funerals.

This source talks about "code-switching" which it describes as when people switch between two different languages. It lists different types of code-switching, as well as how it can be applied or used. The source also gives written examples toward the end.

I think in terms of authenticity, this isn't as bad as it gets because while Trump himself didn't actually create half of the posts, he most likely still approved their messages. I would compare this to a similar situation to how the creator of a bot is still accountable for the actions the bot takes. I think this could have been prevented by having a campaign accout and a personal account.

This source talks about how users used the site to spread their manifestos for shootings and other crimes. This led to 8chan being removed from the internet after pressure from the public. The site was later rebranded and made its return as 8kun.

I think that it is very impressive that a 15-year-old created this website, even if it was mostly copied from a Japanese bulletin board site. I, at the age of 15, would have come nowhere close to putting something together like this, creating something that many people use.

This source talks about and lists all of the mainstream file formats. It gives links to the description of all of the file formats, each of which has different uses, with some being more commonly used than others.

This is really interesting to me. I have worked with every other data type listed except sound data. I'm curious how this data would be used in practice for moderating content that could have profanity or various other uses.

This source has a list of registered bots for Wikipedia with an activity status correlated to them. I think this list is up to date and automatically updates. However, I did not see any newer bots past 2014.

I think expectations differ greatly for normal users versus bots. I also think most people don't even realize that there are social media bots on different platforms. I think most people expect bots to have a very limited variety of vocabulary and not be as advanced as they currently are. I think it is very possible that some bots are indistinguishable from normal users.

I disagree with this ethical framework based on how minimal the description is. I do agree that most things in life should be done in moderation, but there are also things that I don't think ethically should have a place in anyone's life. I also think that people can live virtuously as individuals and that there are actions that can improve one's life, which I would classify as virtuous actions.

As someone who is really interested in algorithms and data science collected on people's tendencies, this resonated with me. I have done a data analysis project on people and how long they work at a job based on their characteristics, but that was limited. I'm interested in how much data these companies collect and what they decide is valuable.