I totally agree that And-But-Therefore is an efficient way because it can attract the readers' attention and can also efficiently introduce how we can help users to solve their worries also it makes readers more willing to continue to spend their time exploring the next steps. I changed my perspective because at first, I didn't notice the importance of And-But-Therefore and I didn't know the sequence to tell the story clearly, so sometimes the story makes the readers confused and don't understand what the key point is and now I understand that what kind of narrative is suitable for providing to users. In addition, I consider that the And-But-Therefore is a good way to let users know if the solutions are useful and suitable for helping them resolve their worries through a clear narrative.

I totally agree that there are more and more people starting to care about design justice in daily practices. I find it useful because paying more attention to what marginalized people think about is very crucial and the design should let everyone feel included and considered regardless of who they are. In addition, the design justice principles can indeed influence how the world changes which is a key factor that designers need time to consider while designing it.

I totally agree that it's indispensable to take the users' perspectives into account to analyze the problems. In addition, evaluating every step of a task can let designers discover potential usability problems that might be ignored during the process of design. I changed my perspective, at first I didn't analyze each step of a task, which might cause confusion for users and they don't know what they should do next and then it causes the interface to be not user-friendly. Now, I realize that the importance of evaluating each step of a task can decrease the possibility of usability problems happening while users using it and it can also save time and money.

I totally agree that looking for usability problems is a key factor in making a user-friendly prototype. The user studies indeed let designers realize if the option for the interface can help users solve their problems without any confusion while using it. I changed my perspective because I realized that a good design needs to let everyone feel included and not just only for a specific group of people, at first I just knew what kind of design I wanted to do but now focusing on what users really want.

I totally agree that affordances mean that users can directly know how to interact with prototypes without any signifiers. This is because it is very important to identify if the design is good or not because the products need to be user-friendly and don't let the users feel confused while interacting with products. I changed my perspective because at first I didn't realize the importance of affordances and then I realized that affordances can determine the experience of interacting between users and products and it also can determine if users want to continue to use it.

I totally agree that a sketch is an easier and more efficient way to build up the thoughts for the design before doing high fidelity prototype; the sketch can clarify the main target for how to solve the problems for users and make a plan for each element in order to ensure the layout is appropriate and efficient for users to use without confusions. I changed my perspectives because at first I just directly did the high-fidelity prototype and it might not be efficient enough because I didn't have a plan before doing it, which means it might cause the situation to forget some key elements in the design process.

I totally agree that using simple and concrete language is a key point for a survey because if the words are too professional or unclear, then respondents will be confused and it might affect the accuracy of the survey at the end. I changed my perspectives because at first I considered that using professional words might increase the connection with my problem but it might make respondents confused about it.

I totally agree that copying designs directly from the research I found is not a good way to fulfill my own design because it might be not useful for my design based on different products, brands, and users. I changed my perspectives because at first, I considered that other designs are more possibly useful because there are already been used by users and not many problems happened but now I realize that I need to create my own designs by referring to the examples.

I totally agree that giving constructive feedback is not an easy thing. This is because giving a useful critique might need professional knowledge somehow and also some feedback like it's good and not great cannot let people realize how to improve their current solutions and indeed know what others' thoughts about it and test it if it's user-friendly enough. I changed my perspective because at first, I hadn't taken this course I might just give vague feedback to others but now I comprehend the importance of giving feedback.

I totally agree that the 100th idea will combine all of the wonderful things together based on the first 99 ideas. This is because the first idea might not be the best and also the 100th idea can be more thorough than others based on the overall explorations. I changed my perspectives because at first I usually pick the first idea and then I will not continue to think about more ideas, which means the first idea I chose might not be logical enough and then it might affect the design later. So, that's the reason I agree that thinking about more ideas is crucial.

I totally agree that situation of creative thinking is sometimes not accepted by society is happening. This is because it's common for not all creative ideas to be encouraged in society. I changed my perspectives because at first if I am using creative thinking to do my work then I will feel worried because I am not sure if my idea is suitable and acceptable now I will keep myself creative in order to explore more things that I might not get without using the creative thinking.

I totally agree that designs are created depending on the different needs and goals of different people. For example, if people are considering choosing to buy a gift for friends, some will care more about the usability and if the products are user-friendly, but others might only consider what the products themselves look like. I changed my perspectives because at first, I didn't understand the key concepts of designing a solution or prototype and then I realized that a good and reliable design is created by different needs and goals from different people.

I agree that clarifying questions is designed for which part of people before defining questions is crucial in a way. Since it can make sure I received the expected information from the interview. I changed my perspectives because at first I always created questions before thinking about what part of the people I wanted to interview, and then it sometimes made interviewees confused.

I agree that thinking about human values first before starting to design is useful and meaningful. It changed my perspective because human values can determine what kind of design will be produced and also if the design indeed helps some people solve their problems. In addition, empathy is also a key point for overall design and making sure what kind of users the target is.

I agree with that empathy is a key point for designing a helpful object and it can efficiently help people to solve their problems. It also change my perspectives because it let me indeed realize that it is indispensable for doing some research for the user's perspectives in order to ensure the design is suitable and efficient for them. Spending time on specializing what the problem is necessary for a designer.