From reading this passage, I think that forms of cultural capital may only be established in wealthy families. My understanding is that if a child of a family can borrow money from their parents to start a business or study, it shows that the family is very supportive of the child's entrepreneurial ideas and has the ability to provide financial support. And this situation just provides many opportunities for the children of these families. But if children from poor families want to borrow money from their parents, I think there is a high probability of failure. Because for families with poor families, parents will put every penny where they need it, perhaps thinking that learning and starting a business are very expensive. So, here I think this point needs to be discussed on a case-by-case basis.

The examples mentioned in this article are very common in our daily life, and even many people will be accustomed to them. But in fact, many people have been unequal since they were embryos in the mother's womb. As explained in the article, many pregnant mothers or women are mostly required to overwork, but still receive very meager wages. And this overworked time will cause them to miss many physical examinations that can avoid their health risks. These physical examinations are very important and even affect the fetus in the womb. The reason why these fetuses in the womb are considered unfair in the mother's womb is because many mothers tend to work more and ignore some fetal examinations, resulting in many fetuses born with a lot of potential health risk.

By reading this paragraph, I very much agree with the point here. One reason why poor students underperform is not because of themselves, but because of what society provides them with conditions that limit their potential. I think this point of view can explain one of the reasons why many poor families will remain poor. Even if the children of these families go to college, it is very likely that the economic situation of these families will not change too much. And the charts in the text also clearly describe some of the degrees that such poor children are restricted.

From reading this paragraph, I think that this "great" is very much like a fallacy that nominally gives many different types of students a learning opportunity to work hard and even eliminate poverty. However, in reality, this 12-year Free education can't play any role. Even, they have taken all 12 years of free education, but their lives have not changed. The only way out for children from poor families seems to be to study, but if they don't change because of study When they do better, they are at fault. I think this view is very bizarre, which is inherently a problem of social systems and policy frameworks.

After reading this passage, I very much agree with the point here. Because in the past, the elites of many societies and some wealth-gathering groups usually devoted themselves to creating elite education and cultivating their offspring to become a new generation of elites, which would tear apart educational resources and cause uneven distribution. The descendants of these elites are more likely to get better teachers, educational resources, and even better schools, because they are more inclined to create private education and pay attention to the teacher-student ratio of each child. As mentioned in the article, these social elites usually support this kind of private education. In this way, many problems of public education are avoided, which is also an important factor leading to education inequality.

By reading the article, there are many factors affecting the implementation of public education in the United States, both political and historical factors are very significant. The democratic control and regional elections reflected in the paper also strongly influence the economic development of public education and the allocation of learning resources to students. And historical factors are also obvious. American class and race issues will form certain obstacles to the development of public education. The article mentioned that although many American colleges and universities will abolish some systems of some racial classes, but prejudice still exists, and this kind of confrontational prejudice will keep American public education in an endless loop.

The phenomenon mentioned in the article clearly points out that the American Dream cannot give all Americans the equal and matching educational resources they deserve. Many Hispanics and blacks are unable to obtain some of the basic educational rights envisioned, and many are even ignored or denied. This clearly shows that the implementation of the concept of the American Dream still has great restrictions and postgraduate entrance examinations. How to reduce this educational burden and strive for educational equality are issues that future decision-makers need to consider.

Deep divisions on education policy have made some already cracked policies more fragile. As described in the article, for example, in some school district housing policies, some families have enough money to buy houses in excellent school districts, and their children will have the opportunity to enter these excellent schools to receive excellent education. Those children whose family environment is not so good have been in a predicament, unable to receive a high-level education, and unable to find a good job when they come out into the society. This also violates the concept of equality of education for all.

By reading this paragraph, I very much agree with the author. Education is very important for the cultivation of talents in a country. At the same time, public education plays a very important role in cultivating the quality of citizens, so I think the existence of public education is very beneficial to the vigorous development of a country. In any case, the development of this kind of public education still has certain difficulties, such as racial segregation. As mentioned in the article, this is also one of the differences that affects the realization of the American Dream.

After reading this passage, I also think that the concept of the American Dream is very powerful, and it also offers a lot of hope to many people. This concept has provided some ideological support to countless people who are struggling. At the same time, this concept also enables many Americans to have team spirit and awareness, to achieve their dreams and realize their own values with common goals and values. moreover, this kind of vision has indeed brought a lot of hope and ideological framework to Americans.