10 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2022
    1. In Arabic, the root of the verb, to witness, is sh-h-d. Roots are important in Arabic. They are present, that is, known and recognizable, not obscure etymologies but immediate and close, giving life directly to all the words that bud and branch from them. From the three-letter root verb, you make the subject and the object, but also adjectives, adverbs and a whole host of other, more complex verbs, subjects and objects related to the first. Even these words—subject, verb, object—are more directly related in Arabic. Translated literally, the subject is the doer, the verb is the doing, the object the one it is done to. In English, a writer writes a book; a letter. In Arabic, al-katib yaktubu kitab; maktoob. All from the root k-t-b, to write. From “to witness,” we get shahed, the one who witnesses; mashhad, the spectacle or the scene, but also shaheed, martyr; istishhad, to be martyred, to die for a cause. var _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____ = function(name) {return (self._wb_wombat && self._wb_wombat.local_init && self._wb_wombat.local_init(name)) || self[name]; }; if (!self.__WB_pmw) { self.__WB_pmw = function(obj) { this.__WB_source = obj; return this; } } { let window = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("window"); let self = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("self"); let document = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("document"); let location = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("location"); let top = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("top"); let parent = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("parent"); let frames = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("frames"); let opener = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("opener"); let arguments; {pubg.queue.push(function(){pubg.displayAds()}) }} As if the act of bearing witness, followed to the end of one of its branches, snaps under the weight of what is seen, and you fall to your death. As if to die for a cause in Arabic is to bear witness to something until it annihilates the self.

      I love this. It's such an eye-opener, because till I read it, I hadn't really realized the power the Arabic language gives to events of importance, occurrences, and people, in comparison to English. just like sh-h-d, shahed, mashhad, and shaheed, there is zahr, to revolt, mozaher, the revolter, and mozahara, the revolution, another strong act of seeking justice and voicing concerns, opinions, and demanding rights.

    2. You cross carrying what you can carry, you cross bearing your witness, you cross knowing that you are damageable, that you are mortal and finite, but that language is memory, and memory lives on.

      The power of language is truly incredible. The power she assigns language is even more incredible. The power that enables it to move stories, events, and people through time, keeping them alive infinitely. It's amazing how language carries so much weight on its shoulders and continues to stride through centuries and centuries allowing others to admire the weight and indulge in it.

    3. There is a violence in undoing someone’s words and reconstituting them in a vocabulary foreign to them, a vocabulary of your own choosing. There is a violence, too, in the way you are—for long moments—annihilated by the other; undone in return. Neither the translator nor the text emerges from the act unscathed.

      I've never really thought about it this way, but this makes a lot of sense. Words written in one language, translated into another strips them of the rich identity they hold. It turns them bland and alters them to make them fitted for people of different backgrounds. This is very similar to how we, here in Egypt, claim to have authentic Indian, Italian, and foreign restaurants and cuisines when in reality, they are cooked with Egyptian ingredients, by Egyptian chefs, altered to fit the Egyptian taste, and so, the identity is basically striped from the dishes claimed to be of specific origins, and often, falsely translated.

    4. We climb the hill together, a key buried in my mother’s pocket, that never once left my mother’s pocket, flying the last half kilometer over jagged rocks and dried clumps of earth that were once orchards and fields. I see my mother pull out the key, ready to open the door, only to find a pile of rubble where our house once was. My clothes my journal my needlework our photos shards of our treasured blue cups ground into the dirt. Everything everything gone.

      This is such a strong image. The image of a family, tragically separated from their motherland; their childhood home, which holds all their memories, standing on the rubble of what was once a place they called home. The power of the home is very symbolic of human loyalty to origins and the place that provides shelter, love, and space to create memories during the maturation from early years to adulthood. It's truly a heartbreaking image to envision, yet very powerful in meaning and rich in emotion.

    5. I have buried seven husbands, three fiancés, fifteen sons and a two-week old daughter I finally agreed to have at 42 for my husband’s sake, to bring life back to his tongue after we laid our two grown, handsome sons to rest, one after the other, and grief took all his words away. Our daughter did not die because of a bullet or mortar shell or carbomb, like my father, sister, brother, cousin, mother, neighbor, pharmacist, teacher. She died because the siege had cut off not only our food and electricity, but also our medicine and medical supplies. There were no child-size incubators to be found in our city. My husband rushed her slowly asphyxiating body from one hospital to another until he finally found one in the next town over. He left her with the nurses there and came home at dawn, exhausted but joyful in his relief. In the afternoon he went back to bring her home, and was led away from the small pediatric ward and down to the morgue, where her perfect blue body lay among countless others they had not yet found place enough to bury. Her name was Fatma.

      this part ran chills down my spine, literally. How can someone lose so many people whom they love so tragically, and still have the courage to live on? I don't know how she did it, and I couldn't even begin to imagine.

  2. Sep 2022
    1. To begin with, classification schemes are now understood as necessary to both survival and intelligence, and that human beings may be hardwired to make categorical distinctions. As one scholar explains, “If our species were ‘programmed’ to refrain from drawing inferences or taking action until we had complete, situation-specific data about each person or object we encountered, we would have died out long ago

      The problem here isn’t that we are hardwired to make categorical distinctions because it is within such distinctions that identity and diversity lies. However, the issue here is that the world has turned into a competition for power and status. It isn’t a matter of mere categorical distinctions, but categorical discrimination and stereotyped false accusations. Where does such a thing originate? Maybe if we knew where it all starts we’d be able to find ways to put an end to it. But one might say that the beginning of the problem —whatever it may be — is deep rooted and runs back to our ancestors and their ancestors and fixing it would be near impossible.

    2. “Othering” is a broadly inclusive term, but sharp enough to point toward a deeper set of dynamics, suggesting something fundamental or essential about the nature of group-based exclusion.

      But what are we changing? This way we’re fading the meaning of such marginalized groups? Stripping their power. We’re removing the identity behind who they are by taking away the words by which they identify themselves and labeling it as “othering”. It simply simplifies their struggle and makes it look absurd to an extent.

    3. “Othering” is a term that not only encompasses the many expressions of prejudice on the basis of group identities, but we argue that it provides a clarifying frame that reveals a set of common processes and conditions that propagate group-based inequality and marginality.

      I think it’s smart to establish a word that refers to all processes and conditions that propagate group based inequality and marginality, however, I feel like it belittles such actions and simplifies them into one world rather than having each individual word relating to the type of action, process, or condition carry its own weight and meaning. When it’s just a world that combines them all, it displays less rage and consequence and fails to hold unjust individuals or masses accountable for their injustice.

    4. Recent terrorist attacks in Paris and Brussels also prompted soul-searching among publics in Western Europe, regarding the lack of cultural and geographic integration of ethnic and racial immigrant groups (many of whom hail from former European colonies) and the persistence of discrimination

      Soul-searching is not enough to make up for the lack of education worldwide. In the past, it was understandable that such events occurred due to a lack of diversity, knowledge, exposure, and education. People felt threatened by differences and that which steered out of what was known to be the “normal” at the time. However, what’s our excuse now? We have been blessed with the means of communication and the ability to connect with people thousands of miles away. We have the exposure a century ago, people lacked, and the knowledge of a thousand years back. We are not uneducated anymore neither are we ignorant or unaware of what’s happening. Why is it so hard for people to just accept differences and learn that discrimination is just speeding the inevitable demise of what we know to be our world today?

    5. Group-based identities are central to each of these conflicts, but in ways that elude simplistic explanations. It is not just religion or ethnicity alone that explains each conflict but often the overlay of multiple identities with specific cultural, geographic, and political histories and grievances that may be rekindled under certain conditions.

      This is very interesting because it also relates to the superiority complex which yes, in many ways goes back to cultural, geographic, and especially political histories and grievances which are perceived as more or less superior by the dominating populations, also assigned through history, which makes them feel entitled to specific rights over others. It’s truly absurd and Hilarious to imagine had the roles been reversed situations would be inevitably the same but opposite what they are now and it’s all because of mistakes created in the past that are still for some reason carried by generations feeling it’s their responsibility to carry it on rather than learn and put an end to it to achieve harmony and stop this struggle between nations and group-based identities in a war to test the concept of survival of the fittest.