At her request
Jacobs wanted this
At her request
Jacobs wanted this
some incidents in her story are more romantic than fiction
does the editor mean there are some parts that have been fabricated for romance rather than altered as fiction?
lived the greater part of the time with a distinguished family in New York, and has so deported herself as to be highly esteemed by them.
Who is the family? Her biological family? One who's taken her in? One she works for? The editor claims they value her.
me
I understand "me" is the editor, but who is the editor? How do they know each other? Who are they to one another?
All was gone, my husband gone (at least separated from me, he being in the Bay; and to add to my grief, the Indians told me they would kill him as he came homeward), my children gone, my relations and friends gone, our house and home and all our comforts—within door and without—all was gone (except my life), and I knew not but the next moment that might go too.
why'd she say her children gone when her daughter is w her?
Those seven that were killed at Lancaster the summer before upon a Sabbath day
Sabbath day is the seventh day of the week (Saturday), so it makes sense that they would tie the sevens together. Why were they killed though?
Capt. Mosely
who is this?
Little do many think what is the savageness and brutishness of this barbarous enemy, Ay, even those that seem to profess more than others among them, when the English have fallen into their hands
I do not understand this. Is she saying the English are making the Natives more savage because they're fighting for protection?
All was gone, my husband gone (at least separated from me, he being in the Bay; and to add to my grief, the Indians told me they would kill him as he came homeward), my children gone, my relations and friends gone, our house and home and all our comforts—within door and without—all was gone (except my life), and I knew not but the next moment that might go too.
Why is she acting like this is surprising information that the colonizers strip people of their life's worth? And actively hope to bring pain and torment onto other people? Like, nobody deserves this treatment-- I'm empathetic of it-- but how did she feel when she saw the same brutality being taken out on natives? Probably didn't bat an eye...
Oh the roaring, and singing and dancing, and yelling of those black creatures in the night, which made the place a lively resemblance of hell
I'm curious if she felt the Native traditions were hellish or if the experience itself was hellish, and the Native traditions are lively in comparison
What, will you love English men still?
I do not know exactly what this means. Are they hoping for her to continue loving English men or to stop feeling that way? Regardless of the different angles this statement could be taking: why do they care?
About a mile we went that night, up upon a hill within sight of the town, where they intended to lodge
why has she been taken?
Now away we must go with those barbarous creatures, with our bodies wounded and bleeding, and our hearts no less than our bodies
who are the barbarous creatures? and who is we?
Despite being saved by the very people whose land he set out to invade, his narrative focuses on the savagery of his “melancholy and wretched captivity” (49).
Him and Mary are so besties so similar so racist
he too painted himself to be an innocent victim.
I understand that nobody wants to be the bad guy, but why do all these people want to be the VICTIM. they want pity, clearly, or else they wouldn't publish the work for people to read and feel bad for them during. If they wanted to tell the story in full, nothing would be left out. They all do it on purpose for a pat on the back. Super annoying.
All that mattered was that a white woman was hurt by a group of non-white people, and that there was seemingly no viable reason for it other than inherent brutality.
AKA Rowlandson wanted her readers to perceive the Natives as awful people, so Rowlandson wrote an extremely racist memoir where I'm 99.9% sure she fabricated in certain areas to make herself seem better/more of a victim and make the Natives seem worse
It did not matter that her dreadful experience was a result of a last-ditch effort by the Native Americans to cease a genocide caused by people like her. Nor did it matter that her captors did what many U.S. citizens proudly claim they would do should an invasion happen today.
YES SHE IS A HYPOCRITE it makes it hard to sympathize with her because of this, too
deemed the context of her captivity unimportant
I JUST WROTE MY BLOG ABOUT THIS!!!! No where does she mention WHY or HOW anything happens. you're completely right that she gave no context on purpose
This is not to say that Rowlandson’s depiction of the colonial encounter isn’t valid or worth the empathy it so easily conjures up for readers.
I am stunned, Maura and I have all the same thoughts (so far)
Mary Rowlandson’s A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson(1682) prescribes an overdose of sorrow, disillusionment and hypocrisy to the unsuspecting reader
YES! Though her story is good to hear, she's painting an incorrect image that all Europeans have fallen victim to Natives.. Mary, no... other way around.
Though many times they would eat that, that a hog or a dog would hardly touch; yet by that God strengthened them to be a scourge to His people.
literally what does this mean
hat I did not see (all the time I was among them) one man, woman, or child, die with hunger.
then why was she repeatedly talking about being starved during every other excerpt? I said SO many times in my annotations, "she must be eating more than she makes it seem because how else is she still alive?" and now we're saying NOBODY died of hunger?
It was thought, if their corn were cut down, they would starve and die with hunger, and all their corn that could be found, was destroyed
if they did this not only would it take their food source but also any potentially trading
They could go in great numbers over, but the English must stop. God had an over-ruling hand in all those things.
does she believe they cannot pass spiritually because God wouldn't allow it or is there more to this im not understanding? or maybe it's less than I think it is: is this literal passing or metaphorical passing
that that river should be impassable to the English
how
they asked me when I thought the English army would come after them? I told them I could not tell
are they afraid? some people are taking this statement as a joke, I'm confused?
and in pursuit of the enemy,
(I think) this is the first time she refers to the Natives as an enemy. She's said barbarous/creatures/master but never "enemy." More of a reason why I'm curious when this excerpt was written, and when the ones prior were in comparison. Did her husband and other Englishmen alter the way she refers to them? Is the saying they're all of their enemies? Or now that she's out of captivity she's fully accepted the way that treated her, and she considers them HER enemy.
I would take leave to mention a few remarkable passages of providence, which I took special notice of in my afflicted time
I know these are excerpts, but this jump confuses me. What happened? When was this written compared to when she was set free? I'm going to have to do more research on this. I do think it's interesting that she wanted to provide these passages; almost like an authors note.
I told them, they had as good knock me in head as starve me to death.
Ironic how she feels that way. They've held her captive for (at least) over a month now; if they were actually trying to starve her to death by now, she would be dead.
hen I went home to my mistress’s wigwam; and they told me I disgraced my master with begging
Are they referring to how they don't want her to go to different wigwams?
Being very hungry I had quickly eat up mine, but the child could not bite it, it was so tough and sinewy, but lay sucking, gnawing, chewing and slabbering of it in the mouth and hand. Then I took it of the child, and eat it myself, and savory it was to my taste. Then I may say as Job 6.7, “The things that my soul refused to touch are as my sorrowful meat.” Thus the Lord made that pleasant refreshing, which another time would have been an abomination
I find it interesting that after watching her own children die in this massacre she'd be so unethical towards another child and take their food. I wonder if the death of her children makes her view children differently, or if she's so desperate for survival she's turning more savage. She states that it was refreshing at this time but at any other moment it would be an "abomination." Is she saying she would never steal from a child under different circumstances, OR is she saying she normally wouldn't eat food that was in another individuals mouth? Either way, she clearly doesn't feel badly for it. I wonder how the squaw reacted.
I went to see how she did, and she was well, considering her captive condition. I would have tarried that night with her, but they that owned her would not suffer it.
I believe she's saying she went to stay with her niece and wanted to stay longer, but the tribe that has taken the child made her leave.
I saw an Englishman stripped naked, and lying dead upon the ground,
So the Natives are killing some Englishmen, why are they sparing her and why did they spare Thomas Read?
there were four English children, captives; and one of them my own sister’s
Her niece has been taken; has her sister been taken too?
We took up our packs and along we went, but a wearisome day I had of it.
I'm still curious if her pack is only her own belongings (mentioned in a past remove; her knitting stuff, etc) or if she's carrying resources that belong to the Native tribe. She's continuously complaining about it, which makes me feel she's not carrying only her own belongings.
So like were these barbarous creatures to him who was a liar from the beginning.
I do find her switch in opinion to be interesting. She's quick to assume Thomas Read is telling the truth over the Indians-- probably because of his skin color.
By which I certainly understood (though I suspected it before) that whatsoever the Indians told me respecting him was vanity and lies. Some of them told me he was dead, and they had killed him; some said he was married again, and that the Governor wished him to marry; and told him he should have his choice, and that all persuaded I was dead.
I am confused by her confusion. These are the same individuals who are holding her captive. Of course they wanted to cause emotional distress through lies??
He being a little cheered with that, I asked him about the welfare of my husband.
I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, she understands the fear of being taken, so it feels inappropriate of her to ask for information while he's going through so much, but at the same time, it feels the two of them are having an exchange of information. She was able to confirm to him that he won't be killed, so he now is telling her about the state of her husband
They all gathered about the poor man, asking him many questions. I desired also to go and see him; and when I came, he was crying bitterly, supposing they would quickly kill him. Whereupon I asked one of them, whether they intended to kill him; he answered me, they would not.
I wonder why the Natives aren't killing them? It seems as though they gain their power off fear over physical pain
About this time they came yelping from Hadley, where they had killed three Englishmen, and brought one captive with them, viz. Thomas Read.
I wonder if she knew of him prior to this
But I knew that He laid upon me less than I deserved.
I believe this is the first her verbalizes a doubt in God. A large change in her mindset within past removes. This is most likely a result of her spending more time in entrapment (and experiencing more violence/labor/starvation0
when I was without, and saw nothing but wilderness, and woods, and a company of barbarous heathens, my mind quickly returned to me,
I understand why she feels she needs to turn against them, especially considering all she's probably been taught by other English colonizers and all she's experienced with the Native Americans has been violent and traumatic, but I find it interesting that it seemed like she was beginning to trust/live (kind of) cohesively with them and just trusting God to save her, but now she's back to her initial thoughts that parallel those she had in the first remove
A squaw moved it down again, at which I looked up, and she threw a handful of ashes in mine eyes. I thought I should have been quite blinded, and have never seen more, but lying down, the water run out of my eyes, and carried the dirt with it, that by the morning I recovered my sight again
the women are definitely more violent but it's interesting that they are considering it's the men who pull weapons
one asked me to make a shirt for her papoose, for which she gave me a mess of broth, which was thickened with meal made of the bark of a tree, and to make it the better, she had put into it about a handful of peas, and a few roasted ground nuts.
trading food for clothing
But the Lord upheld my Spirit, under this discouragement; and I considered their horrible addictedness to lying, and that there is not one of them that makes the least conscience of speaking of truth.
I'm not surprised she is still keeping faith: if anything, now I would be shocked if she lost it because of her trends within the passages. I wonder if they're lying to torture/break her, or if they're telling the truth to hurt her/just solely be honest
He answered me that such a time his master roasted him, and that himself did eat a piece of him, as big as his two fingers, and that he was very good meat.
Literally what
must go with them five or six miles down the river into a mighty thicket of brush; where we abode almost a fortnight.
genuinely what is she eating? there is no way she would still be alive right now if she were eating as little as conveyed in these removes. very confused.
a fortnight
a span of two weeks
I told them the skin was off my back, but I had no other comforting answer from them than this: that it would be no matter if my head were off too.
who did she say this to a why? her initial capturers or the new people who just showed her kindness?
at last an old Indian bade me to come to him, and his squaw gave me some ground nuts; she gave me also something to lay under my head, and a good fire we had; and through the good providence of God, I had a comfortable lodging that night. In the morning, another Indian bade me come at night, and he would give me six ground nuts, which I did.
interesting how the Indians of (I assume) different tribes treat her differently
I went to one wigwam, and they told me they had no room. Then I went to another, and they said the same;
so she left even though she expects them to be upset with this
Then one of the company drew his sword, and told me he would run me through if I did not go presently. Then was I fain to stoop to this rude fellow, and to go out in the night, I knew not whither.
she seems to be expressing that she can predict their actions now. it seems like nothing really scares her, she just knows they act out in order for her to comply to their wants
when we came to lie down they bade me to go out
who exactly made her leave? back to saying "they"
wigwam
still unsure what this word means
my master
she seems to hold more respect for him now. why?
my master being gone, who seemed to me the best friend that I had of an Indian
(I think) this is the first time she refers to the Indians as anything other than barbarous/creatures or just saying "they"
ith my heart as full as it could hold, and yet so hungry that I could not sit neither
I find it interesting that she connects these two thoughts within the same sentence. Most people would argue that all humans need are food, water, shelter-- those of which she doesn't really have (not in a stable way). But she still feels that her heart is full despite the fact that she's starving. Her heart feels full because of her love and faith in her God, not because things are going well for her. It's interesting to see her keep the faith.
As soon as I had the opportunity, I took my Bible to read, and that quieting Scripture came to my hand, “Be still, and know that I am God” (Psalm 46.10). Which stilled my spirit for the present.
She is still hiding her bible from her mistress; I still believe protecting her bible is a mask for protecting herself
again in three day
are they collecting resources? preparing for a battle with the English??
said he would go on, and come to us again in three days
I do not understand traveling there just to come back? Where is everyone going??
on a sudden my mistress gives out; she would go no further, but turn back again, and said I must go back again with her, and she called her sannup, and would have had him gone back also
what is her desire to turn around? if she's tired, going back will not benefit her, as she will still have to travel regardless. I wonder if this foreshadows serious danger ahead
sannup
a married male Native American
But the thoughts of my going homeward (for so we bent our course) much cheered my spirit, and made my burden seem light, and almost nothing at all.
so they're traveling in the direction of her homeland?
I complained it was too heavy, whereupon she gave me a slap in the face
Many dynamics in here I find interesting. Mary seems to be more vocal of her discomfort towards the mistress and the mistress seems to be more physically abuse than the other characters we've seen throughout the story. It's interesting, I wonder if Mary complained to her because she was another woman and she too complied to the belief that women are weaker than men. I wonder if the mistress has dealt with so much abuse herself that she must take her frustrations out on Mary. I don't know, I just think this is an interesting interaction on both ends.
gave me my load
her belongings? or their resources?
mistress
does she not want Mary to keep her faith? there is definitely more to the story here
and never let her see it afterward
I believe that, in her eyes, protecting her bible is a means of protecting herself. She believes God will save her, so she must save God (her bible)
papoose
child
“Nux,” which did much rejoice my spirit
regardless of what the word means, I see it has a positive connotation for her
Nux
ive been unable to find a clear response online of what this word actually means. I will say, I don't think it means yes or no, but rather something else from their native tongue
sell me to my husband
does she mean return her back or are the natives holding her ransom?
sell me for powder:
Is she saying this out of assumption or experience? How many women has she seen sold for goods?
Hearing that my son was come to this place, I went to see him, and found him lying flat upon the ground. I asked him how he could sleep so? He answered me that he was not asleep, but at prayer;
thank goodness at least one of her children seem to be alive
I offered the money
I'm shocked she has money, I would assume they'd have taken it when they took her
Yet I answered, they would kill me. “No,” said he, “none will hurt you.” Then came one of them and gave me two spoonfuls of meal to comfort me, and another gave me half a pint of peas; which was more worth than many bushels at another time. Then I went to see King Philip. He bade me come in and sit down, and asked me whether I would smoke it (a usual compliment nowadays amongst saints and sinners) but this no way suited me. For though I had formerly used tobacco, yet I had left it ever since I was first taken. It seems to be a bait the devil lays to make men lose their precious time. I remember with shame how formerly, when I had taken two or three pipes, I was presently ready for another, such a bewitching thing it is. But I thank God, He has now given me power over it; surely there are many who may be better employed than to lie sucking a stinking tobacco-pipe.
I find it interesting she's yet to notice she's been spared, and the Native's made this decision a long time ago. In my opinion, they decided to spare her the moment they chose not to kill her despite her wounds.
Then my heart began to fail: and I fell aweeping, which was the first time to my remembrance, that I wept before them. Although I had met with so much affliction, and my heart was many times ready to break, yet could I not shed one tear in their sight;
why is she trying to hold back her emotions? does she still fear death upon them despite their focus being turned toward fleeing the English?
“Naked came I out of my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return: the Lord gave, the Lord hath taken away, blessed be the name of the Lord.” I asked him whether he would read. He told me he earnestly desired it, I gave him my Bible, and he lighted upon that comfortable Scripture “I shall not die but live, and declare the works of the Lord: the Lord hath chastened me sore yet he hath not given me over to death” (Psalm 118.17-18).
she truly turns to god as her greatest companion
But as my foot was upon the canoe to step in there was a sudden outcry among them, and I must step back, and instead of going over the river, I must go four or five miles up the river farther northward. Some of the Indians ran one way, and some another
after tapping into their violent tendencies they still live in fear of the English. that goes to show just how awful they truly were to the Native; no matter how bad they act, the English are always worse in comparison.
On the morrow morning we must go over the river, i.e. Connecticut
Wow, I didn't process this was around New England. I'm curious what places they travelled through
wigwams
confused
The first week of my being among them I hardly ate any thing; the second week I found my stomach grow very faint for want of something; and yet it was very hard to get down their filthy trash; but the third week, though I could think how formerly my stomach would turn against this or that, and I could starve and die before I could eat such things, yet they were sweet and savory to my taste.
i'm curious if they're starving her or if they're simply low on resources.
In this travel, because of my wound, I was somewhat favored in my load; I carried only my knitting work and two quarts of parched meal. Being very faint I asked my mistress to give me one spoonful of the meal, but she would not give me a taste. They quickly fell to cutting dry trees, to make rafts to carry them over the river: and soon my turn came to go over. By the advantage of some brush which they had laid upon the raft to sit upon, I did not wet my foot (which many of themselves at the other end were mid-leg deep) which cannot but be acknowledged as a favor of God to my weakened body,
Why are they treating her differently compared to the other prisoners? she states "I did not wet my foot (which many of themselves at the other end were made-leg deep)" She seems to realize she's been treating differently but I can't understand why she is.
hold the English army in play
when she says "hold them in play" is she acknowledging that the natives did not possess the resources to properly fight back the English and essentially are "play-fighting" mores to save time for the others to escape.
For they went as if they had gone for their lives
does she not understand that the natives are afraid of them? does she not see the parallels in their treatment towards her and the English's treatment towards them?
moving at this time was the English army,
thank you for addressing this traveling, Mrs. Rowlandson
By their noise and hooping they signified how many they had destroyed (which was at that time twenty-three).
what is it they're destroying and is there significant to the number 23?
“Wait on the Lord, Be of good courage, and he shall strengthen thine Heart, wait I say on the Lord.”
I cannot fathom why she isn't fighting more for freedom. I understand having faith in god, but girl.. save yourself
my son
how many children does she have? does she know where all of them are? who else has passed, and who's suffering the same fate as her husband (whatever that may be...)
She was about ten years old, and taken from the door at first by a Praying Ind. and afterward sold for a gun.
Oh my gosh, this wasn't the first or only baby she lost. That is terrible.
Then they went and showed me where it was, where I saw the ground was newly digged, and there they told me they had buried it.
I find it interesting how individuals who committed so much brutality upon people took the time to bury the child and tell the mother where they were buried.
t being about six years, and five months old. It was n
Why is she saying it?
my child being even ready to depart this sorrowful world
this is a powerful line. I believe she's saying even her BABY wishes to die.
“your master will knock your child in the head,”
Are they trying to remind her she isn't safe? Was there any interactions prior to this statement that could have led them there? Why threaten her?
travel again
I am still confused where everyone is going
This day there came to me one Robert Pepper (a man belonging to Roxbury) who was taken in Captain Beers’s fight, and had been now a considerable time with the Indians
Are he and them in cahoots or against one another? What does she mean by "been now a considerable time with the Indians"
I then remembered how careless I had been of God’s holy time; how many Sabbaths I had lost and misspent, and how evilly I had walked in God’s sight; which lay so close unto my spirit, that it was easy for me to see how righteous it was with God to cut off the thread of my life and cast me out of His presence forever. Yet the Lord still showed mercy to me, and upheld me; and as He wounded me with one hand, so he healed me with the other.
it breaks me that she thinks she could have prevented this if she were closer to God. She doesn't deserve to bear that much guilt.
except only a little cold water
I wonder what her child is ingesting. How old is the baby?
there being not the least crumb of refreshing that came within either of our mouths from Wednesday night to Saturday night, except only a little cold water.
this makes me take back my last question; I think they're keeping her alive to torture her
what with my own wound, and my child’s being so exceeding sick, and in a lamentable condition with her wound.
I find it curious they haven't killed them. They're obviously weak, you would assume they would have no use of them. Are they keeping her alive as torture or as an act of kindness?
One of the Indians got up upon a horse, and they set me up behind him, with my poor sick babe in my lap.
I wonder if they're doing this for her because she's restricted in some way (tied up, injured, etc) or because they have some care for her and want to help her
way
where?
they
I find it interesting that she still hasn't exactly stated who "they" are. You would think after all the abuse she would want to scream their names from the rooftops letting everyone know the harm they have inflicted upon her, her family and others
But the Lord renewed my strength still, and carried me along, that I might see more of His power; yea, so much that I could never have thought of, had I not experienced it.
I wonder if religion will stay prominent throughout the removes
Then they set me upon a horse with my wounded child in my lap, and there being no furniture upon the horse’s back, as we were going down a steep hill we both fell over the horse’s head, at which they, like inhumane creatures, laughed,
I can't tell what makes me more sad: the fact that a child is even there, or the fact that the "inhumane creatures" aren't even processing how must distress they're subjecting this woman to
but God was with me in a wonderful manner, carrying me along, and bearing up my spirit, that it did not quite fail
It's interesting to see how big a role religion has over people facing traumatic events. Like a security blanket.
It is not my tongue, or pen, can express the sorrows of my heart, and bitterness of my spirit that I had at this departure
I am confused-- is she under attack by the Natives or my colonizers? What is her ethnicity? What did she do to deserve this?