66 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2021
    1. Effectively tackling this issue–and empoweringboth local and national governments and institu-tions–will require visionary and far-sightedapproaches that are able to justify investment ofscarce resources to long-term capacity buildingobjectives in the face of immediate conservationproblems

      I feel this is the most difficult part. Most people just based on modern attitudes want immediate results and immediate return on what their money has gone into. Conservation can sometimes have immediate results, but the "payout" during a long-term solution is worth much more when it creates a ripple effect of change within an ecosystem or government.

      It's so hard to push for the long-term image. We need to push for those visions so that we are able to make a more permanent or long-lasting impact on our planet

    1. ·Conservation history: how has conservationchanged since its inception?

      Although this is just the introduction, Conservation has come a long way since the beginning. Seeing the evolution of what was once just "save the planet" to us genuinely analyzing our impact on Earth and how we can slow down the seemingly endless overconsumption of literally everything is amazing to see. Many people see conservation as just saving the trees, but it truly is so much more and as we progress through the years and develop stronger tactics we can hopefully have a completely healthy and happy earth.

    1. irst, the sheer extent to which we have domi-nated the biosphere (terrestrial, freshwater, andmarine) (Ehrlich and Ehrlich 2008) means that wehave no choice but to integrate conservation ef-forts with other human activities.

      I think it would be very interesting to see a poll done to see how people feel about this statement. Do the majority of people understand that we cannot just ignore biodiversity on the areas that we have claimed? How do politicians feel about implementing conservation efforts for owned land?

  2. Mar 2021
    1. Already there are widespread changes in thephysical environment, primarily involving thesolid and liquid phases of water. Northern hemi-sphere lakes are freezing later in the autumn andthe ice is breaking up earlier in the spring.

      From when I was a child to now I certainly see a difference in our transitions from Fall --> Winter and Winter --> Spring. Simply pointing out changes viewed throughout my lifetime seem like a major change that goes unnoticed by so many around me. Many do not pay attention or care to even think about why our seasons are drastically different from the past

    1. Although the great majority of invasive speciesare introduced, occasionally native plantspecies have become invasive, spreadingrapidly into previously unoccupied habitats.

      I find this very interesting as I never really think of other native plant species becoming invasive. I always think of it as humans, whether it's on purpose for consumption or on accident, introducing a new species to an area.

  3. Feb 2021
    1. Small populations are vulnerable to local extinc-tion, but a species has a greater likelihood ofpersistence where there are a number of localpopulations interconnected by occasional move-ments of individuals among them

      This is important because I think it allows people to focus on multiple species at a time and realize the importance of them as not only individuals but as a region's "team"

    1. Most areas of high human population densityhave suffered heavy habitat destruction.

      It's sad that instead of coexisting with these ecosystems by removing small segments of them, we as a species have chosen to completely get rid of them. If we were simply more cautious with clearing out smaller bits of land instead of all of it, we would be in a much better place.

    2. Twenty-five nationshave lost virtually all of their forest cover, andanother 29 more than nine-tenths of their forest(MEA 2005). Tropical forests are disappearingat up to 130 000 km2a year

      I knew about deforestation being an issue, but I never knew the issue was this large. When I learned about the environment as a child we simply acknowledged the shrinking of our forests, but never truly dove into the severity of the topic. I think if we teach children about this issue at a young age, they will be more inclined to care and be more conscious of our impact on the environment.

    1. First, there areinstances in which the same species is knownunder more than one name (synonymy). This ismore frequent amongst widespread species,which may show marked geographic variationin morphology, and may be described anew re-peatedly in different regions. Second, one namemay actually encompass multiple species (hom-onymy). This typically occurs because these spe-cies are very closely related, and look very similar(cryptic species), and molecular analyses may berequired to recognize or confirm their differences

      I appreciate the mentioning of errors that are made in data. Collecting data for biodiversity is extremely difficult and probably really tedious so it is near impossible (or rather would talk a long time) to map out the genome for every individual within a population(s) so these errors are bound to occur.

    2. For convenience,they can be divided into three groups: geneticdiversity, organismal diversity, and ecologicaldiversity

      I appreciate the split between different groups for biodiversity. Looking at just one group or another you could say an area is "diverse" by viewing it through just one lens, whereas looking at it from all angles, you may notice that the area is not as diverse as once thought. These groups allow us to dive deeper into what we consider to truly be diverse

    1. respect for the natural world

      I feel we can see this throughout our life time with the increasing prevalence of eco-friendly and safe biodegradable products in our society. I feel this is even more so prevalent currently because of COVID-19 and the use of take-out containers for restaurants and universities like PSU. I've seen some changes be made from using plastic containers to using paper ones that are able to breakdown more easily.

    2. That thread weaves through related themes andconcepts in conservation, including wildernessprotection, sustained yield, wildlife protectionand management, the diversity-stability hypoth-esis, ecological restoration, sustainability, andecosystem health.

      I love the openness of conservation because it allows so many disciplines to join along for the journey of discovery

  4. Oct 2020
    1. At the time, there were few documented reports of human health effects

      Once discovered, was there a significant increase in the (seemingly) subtle changes spotted in humans?

    2. In the Great Lakes, domesticated mink virtually stopped producing pups (11, 12) and herring gull chicks were dying in their eggs (13). In Florida's Lake Apopka, alligators began dying off, with many males afflicted with physically disabled genitalia (14, 15)

      Serious impacts on populations in a given area!!!!

    3. The prevalence of EDCs in our environment and our bodies represents a significant global public health challenge.

      I can't imagine the absolute panic that started when EDCs were discovered because scientists had to pinpoint the damage that may have already been done and how to reverse or maintain everything

    1. We will specifically focus on DNA methylation since they are the most documented epigenetic marks so far and because more and more analytical and technical tools are being developed for studying DNA methylation patterns in natural populations (Table S1).

      This makes sense because it will make their hypothesis easier to support

    2. DNA methylation patterns are more likely to reflect the short‐term “ecological background” of individuals.

      Evolution can take a lot of time, and for species that may go extinct, it will often be too late before something can be done to help the species. Looking at epigenetics allows for biologists to see these markers that can affect a species long-term much faster.

    3. It is now largely acknowledged that biodiversity conservation should not only focus on rare and iconic species, but also focus on ecosystems as whole unit on the one hand, and on genes as a key element of species' adaptability on the other hand (Eizaguirre & Baltazar‐Soares, 2014)

      All species and the ecosystems they exist in impact each other including the one "rare" or "iconic" species that is also existing with them. It's important to pay attention to the larger picture

  5. Sep 2020
    1. with the former becoming more

      The undernourished is more likely to cling onto the fats because the metabolic processes are stuck on "survival mode"

    2. There are many apparently simplemeasures that, although program-matically hard to implement, couldpotentially have major publichealth impact.

      The effort needs to be put forth from the public to implement these measures. It may be hard to switch over or inform everyone, but in the end it will have a long-lasting impact on our health as a species.

    3. Further efforts to explainthe obesity epidemic on a geneticbasis have been disappointing

      Many may want to believe that it is surface level with diet and exercise instead of going within our genetic codes and markers to discover what may be causing increased risks in obesity

    4. It is imperative that thismind-set is changed

      Having greater knowledge beyond geneticists and other micro forms of scientists will greatly help the human race and its future generations by providing adequate information to those who are having children on the effects their diet and activity can have on their offspring

    5. and paternal obesity inducespancreatic dysfunction in female off-spring

      Is this because there are few genes that are carried on the Y chromosome, therefore females are affected?

    6. eductions infamily size in Europe and Chinamight be contributing with respectto the increased prevalence ofmetabolic disease.

      smaller families = less second, third, etc born children, resulting in a higher rate of metabolic differences

    7. This hypothesis hasrecently been tested in a cohort of30-year old adults, where thosewho were first-born were signifi-cantly fatter than those with oldersiblings

      How many adults were tested?

    8. the re-sultant mismatch could contributeto the modern day epidemic ofobesity and other chronic non-communicable diseas

      Having metabolic processes that cling on to fat due to undernutrition somewhere up an ancestral line can result in those who are not undernourished to hold onto those fat contents a lot more, resulting in obesity.

    9. The potential fitness costs of pre-dicting a rich environment and end-ing up in a nutritionally poor envi-ronment are likely to be greaterthan those of predicting a poorenvironment and ending up in arich environmen

      This is because the body and its metabolic processes were not prepared for any form of undernutrition

    10. if the fetus is then born to amore nutritionally rich world, it ismore likely to have a physiologymismatched to that environment

      I wonder if with further research if we will be able to undo some of these epigenetic markers that put some individuals at a disadvantage

    11. Thus, a fetus which is exposedto signals which it interprets asreflecting nutrient deficiency will setits metabolic trajectory for an envi-ronment of limited energy availabil-ity.

      This is an amazing mechanism of the human body preparing for the worst!

    12. There is also an increasing body ofevidence suggesting that assistedreproductive technologies, such asin vitro fertilization, can affect off-spring outcome

      How so? Do in vitro fertilization offspring have more or less "issues" arising during life?

    13. apparently normalbirth weight

      What is defined by "apparently normal" birth weight? I think metabolic processes and maybe diet could also be looked at to observe the true effects of this

    14. it had theunfortunate consequence ofprompting subsequent experimen-tal and clinical studies to focus onthose born small.

      It's frustrating that studying these topics through experiments now is that there are more strict guidelines and a greater agreement/understanding at what is ethical/unethical

    15. This may explain some ofthe scepticism in accepting the evi-denceforearlylifeeffectswithinthenormative range of developmentalexposures having lifelong conse-quences for human health

      It's sad to see a discipline so directly applied to human health nearly disregarding evolution as a cause for many parts in human health. This knowledge could help prevent and further treat or prevent some conditions that evolve over the course of one's life.

    16. here is alsoincreasing evidence of potentialadvantage persisting across gen-erations;

      How does this correlate with evolution? Is the short-term need for these polymorphisms really important enough to carry on to the next generation(s)?

  6. Aug 2020
    1. The toadsare called out from hibernation by the thunder that accom-panies the first spring storm in the Sonoran desert. (Unfor-tunately, motorcycles produce the same sounds, causingthese toads to come out from hibernation and die in thescorching Arizona sunlight.

      How does this affect the population of the toads? Would restrictions on noise levels in a given area help these species in any way?

    2. . For instance, when newlyhatched wood frog (Rana sylvetica) tadpoles are reared intanks containing the predatory larval dragonfly,Anax(con-fined in mesh cages so that they cannot kill the tadpoles),the tadpoles in the predator-filled tanks grow smaller thanthose in similar tanks without the caged predators.

      Does this imply that in response to excess stress, the tadpoles then became smaller and faster to adjust to the presence of predators whereas ones with no added stressors from predators have "no need" to be smaller and faster?

    3. For this to happen, themore fit phenotype would have to be formed even in theabsence of the environmental induce

      This is why we now look at genetic composition instead of an organism as a whole because without this genetic knowledge, questions about evolution and why one group deemed "more fit" may not carry those "favorable" genes onto future generations. With genomic information, it is clear to see that environment can be isolated and a different result is produced

    4. The genomenot only acts, but it reacts. It responds to the environmentby changing its expression patterns

      The different phenotypes act almost like a switch where the environmental impacts have the ability to flip the switches in different ways causing variants in expression

    5. The last two criteria are very important because theyeliminate the effects of the environment on development

      This allows us to see the impact the environment truly has on an organism

    6. The second upheaval came in the1960s, when the paradigms of molecular genetics overtookthose of physiology (Gilbert, 1996; Keller, 1995). One nolonger studied the “whole organism.” Rather, differentialgene expression became the dominant model

      Taking a look at molecular structures and genetic make up as opposed to visible phenotypes allows for a better understanding of what is going on within an organism. Looking at an organism as just what one can see can leave behind many answers to questions being asked and many questions waiting to be asked

    7. problems that have traditionally been segregated into fields,such as immunology, larval ecology, pest management, lifehistory strategies, neurobiology, and even dentistry.

      What are these problems that get lumped into one specific category, and how can we stray away from this one-way road state of mind?

    8. Ecological developmental biology is the meeting of devel-opmental biology with the real world.

      What are we referencing here when we say "real world"? Are we talking actual ecosystems in their natural form without experimental input?

  7. Feb 2020
    1. When inbreeding occurs, it is expected that the genetic diversity of a population will decrease because of the lack of introduction of new genes into the pool.

    1. Look at the race and dray-horse, or at the greyhound and mastiff. Their whole frames, and even their mental characteristics, have been modified; but if we could trace each step in the history of their transformation--and the latter steps can be traced--we should not see great and simultaneous changes, but first one part and then another slightly modified and improved. Even when selection has been applied by man to some one character alone--of which our cultivated plants offer the best instances-- it will invariably be found that although this one part, whether it be the flower, fruit, or leaves, has been greatly changed, almost all the other parts have been slightly modified. This may be attributed partly to the principle of correlated growth, and partly to so-called spontaneous variation.

      Natural selection is not the sole reason for changes in a species, artificial selection with dogs can also occur, example greyhounds and mastiffs. Their traits can be improved because humans will hand pick individuals with "favorable" traits to create more, resulting in diminishment of non-favorable traits.

    2. I have already endeavoured to explain how plants became twiners, namely, by the increase of a tendency to slight and irregular revolving movements, which were at first of no use to them; this movement, as well as that due to a touch or shake, being the incidental result of the power of moving, gained for other and beneficial purposes

      Plants that twine have proven to be more fit than those who did not, so certain species have adapted this trait

    3. It is not easy to imagine two objects more widely different in appearance than a bristle or vibraculum, and an avicularium like the head of a bird; yet they are almost certainly homologous and have been developed from the same common source, namely a zooid with its cell.

      Species may look "similar" but each will have evolved gradually over time making them drastically different when looking closer at their traits.

    4. Perhaps the lesser number of teeth in the proportion of four to seven in the upper halves of the two jaws of the plaice, to twenty-five to thirty in the lower halves, may likewise be accounted for by disuse

      Structures disappear over time when they are not used. This may seem from an uneducated perspective that the organism has not evolved as much as others, when in reality it has and proved not every feature is necessarily beneficial to its own survival.

    5. From the highly developed structure of the shoveller's beak we may proceed (as I have learned from information and specimens sent to me by Mr. Salvin), without any great break, as far as fitness for sifting is concerned, through the beak of the Merganetta armata, and in some respects through that of the Aix sponsa, to the beak of the common duck

      Comparing species with similar features that may have evolved over time based on their needs for survival.

    6. Assuming that an insect originally happened to resemble in some degree a dead twig or a decayed leaf, and that it varied slightly in many ways, then all the variations which rendered the insect at all more like any such object, and thus favoured its escape, would be preserved, while other variations would be neglected and ultimately lost; or, if they rendered the insect at all less like the imitated object, they would be eliminated. There would indeed be force in Mr. Mivart's objection, if we were to attempt to account for the above resemblances, independently of natural selection, through mere fluctuating variability; but as the case stands there is none.

      This species has little variability in the way it looks, proving natural selection in the trait of looking like the environment to be true.

    7. A structure which has been developed through long-continued selection, when it ceases to be of service to a species, generally becomes variable, as we see with rudimentary organs; for it will no longer be regulated by this same power of selection.

      Parts of an organism that vary greatly from individual to individual are seen as less important because of how variable it is. Having more specific traits shows that they are more favorable to the survival of the species

    8. As these variations seem of no special use to the plants, they cannot have been influenced by natural selection.

      Variations that just do not make sense for the benefit of the plant, are simply not natural selection

    9. but now we know this to be the case

      Some things may seem pointless, but with further research we find that things may be more useful than they seem

    10. when one part is modified, so will be other part

      important to remember this, evolution doesn't always happen one part at a time, it is often multiple parts of something

    11. The most striking modifications, excellently adapted for some purpose, might, as was formerly remarked, be acquired by successive variations, if slight, first in one part and then in another; and as they would be transmitted all together, they would appear to us as if they had been simultaneously developed. The best answer, however, to the above objection is afforded by those domestic races which have been modified, chiefly through man's power of selection, for some special purpose.

      All modifications serve a purpose, although not presented at the same exact time in every being, they survive much easier with changes. Survival of the fittest. These modifications happen slowly over time, but they do occur

  8. Jan 2020
    1. Will these practices actually help the earth and its rapidly increasing populations? Or will this just apply to nation that can afford this kind of science?

    2. The study of evolution, which in the past was often equated with changes in gene frequencies in populations, has become more holistic and integrative. Researchers are increasingly interested in exploring how interactions among genes, individuals, and environments have shaped the evolutionary process, both at micro- and macrolevels. At the same time, large challenges such as global warming, novel infectious diseases, and threats to biodiversity are increasing, and the opportunity for evolutionary biologists to contribute to their resolution has never been greater.

      What species? Any specific genes?

    3. Realizing the full potential inherent in evolutionary biology is, however, far from assured. The task of integrating evolutionary knowledge within and across scales of biological organization, as discussed above, requires development of many comparative databases and analytical tools. We would do well to collaborate broadly, cultivating new expertise, and to watch out for the unexpected, as analyses of new kinds of data can reveal that preconceptions are unfounded.

      Organizing our thoughts on how we approach evolution really will help the science community with the progress in research. Having a jumbled approach only makes things more difficult, and creating some sort of cohesiveness will aid greatly in the efficiency in making new finds.

    4. I didn't know that so many different fields contributed to our current knowledge on evolution. It really shows that science goes just beyond what people think.

    5. This part of evolutionary biology interests me because I am really interested in human biology and diseases and whatnot. I think it's amazing that we can use our knowledge on evolution to figure out how to cure diseases and disorders.