ExperienceIt is not uncommon for people to claim a bit of authenticity by immersing them-
This is the stance of the author in this particular essay. In addition i feel that this is the main resource for my essay. The entirety of invisible man is him validating his idenitity authentification through various events
MembershipAuthenticity through group identity is a construct that is elastic. The
This particular part of the essay toes in well to my topic of invisible man. There are many times where the character interacts in group settings as a way of finding his social identity
to the presentation of self one claims and Taylor (1992) calls self-reflexivi
Another status that i agree with. The most common authenticate is within one's self. Again thia can easily be tied to my essay through the main character
end consumers of the musi
I have always thought that the listener determined whether they tristed the source of the music they are listening to.
As Bill Yousman has effectively argued, this consumption reflects a simultaneous “blackophilia” and “blackophobia” among white consumers, allowing white consumers to “contain their fears and animosities towards Blacks through rituals . . . of ador
This part of the essay I feel is actually somewhat still true today except on a grander scale.
ouTube seems like the only way songs become truly massive anymore
I feel like this explains that Youtube is less like a economy but more like a monopoly.
Mechanical reproduction means repetition, which ensures that your voice livesand yet suggests death.
Could this be the same thing as a something eventually being so good that it gets played out. Seems to be a contradiction of itsself
According to this view, text itself is a dying medium, as we turn to voice,spectacle, and performance; this turn is in any case a return, since poetry is originall
I think that this is the main claim that the author has to make. That Poetry is no longer in the standard text form. It has evolved into an oral art and is demonstrated more or less by "poetic singers" like Bob Dylan
I have also thought it expedient to restrict myself still further, having abstained from the use of many expressions, in themselves proper and beautiful, but which have been foolishly repeated by bad Poets, till such feelings of disgust are connected with them as it is scarcely possible by any art of association to overpower
Could this possibly be a battle between pleasing the author as well as meeting the needs of the reader? Better yet the expectations of the reader? Who exactly is a "bad Poet?" what makes a poet a "bad one"? Why does Wordsworth use such strong language like "disgust"
Others who pursue a different track will interest him likewise; I do not interfere with their claim, but wish to prefer a claim of my own.
this statement has both an IS and a TS statement right by each other. The IS is sused to refute the TS in this case.
Writers in metre seem to lay claim to by prescription
This is a TS statement because we are being spoken to about the writers perspective and not the author himself.
The Reader will find that personifications of abstract ideas rarely occur in these volumes; and are utterly rejected, as an ordinary device to elevate the style, and raise it above prose.
This is an IS statement because here we are being told what the reader should find. Why is personification utterly rejected if it is one of the main components of any literary text
If one hasn’t enjoyed a poem and been moved by it, one hasn’t really experienced it as an artwork
what are different ways to truly enjoy or be moved by an artwork?
Because lyric is a short form (unlike the epic or the verse-tale), it must be more concise than narrative or drama. Every word has to count. So does every gap [. . .]
Is this saying that every part of lyric has a meaning from the title to the stanzas to the organization?
But besides the narrative and dramatic social gestures, there exists the large body of poetry we call lyric.
I normally only associate lyric with songs, and not poetry even though songs are a form of poetry.
The diary is the nearest prose equivalent to the lyric, but a diary is seen by a reader as the words of another person, whereas a lyric is meant to be spoken by its reader as if the reader were the one uttering the words.
I thought that a diary was someone's words by itself. I would expect lyric to be said by someone else and not the reader.