13 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2022
    1. tify with the rationalist and effective altruist movements, I'd say I inhabit the edges of these com

      this is implicit bc you have a dating doc at all, and no one outside these grps does

    2. Day to day that looks like me paying attention to friction in my workflows, incidental complexity people encounter and structural/architectural issues in tools I use and following my curiosity in thinking how things can be better.It also implies a lot of iteration often means that I get excited about something, build a prototype and then get excited about something new 😅Some things I've been thinking about recently:Integrating messaging with knowledge management & more broadly exploring providing messaging as deeply integrated connection layer between applicationsHot to make web more context richhttps://github.com/transclude-me/extensionhttps://twitter.com/VladyslavSitalo/status/1501454170074664962How to connect people who are thinking about similar deep unique things (through looking at their writing)Can we make Semantic Web work by allowing people annotate URLs with structured metadata?

      i'd use 'explore' instead of 'playing'

      this is basically your personality traits, i'd talk about them explicitly rather than embedding them into your work description

      talk about the details over a drink or something, can even put that in explicitly

  2. May 2021
    1. Empirically, the hyperparameters we chose, require on average around∼1kGPU.hours(with V100s) to evaluate our 700m parameters model (which leverages GPT-3’s sparse attention aswell as key-value caching).

      [[TODO]] #cc find out how cheap i can get 1,000 hours on gpus. actually i can use the lab to get this for free if lucky. can use up the spare hours from work.

  3. Apr 2021
    1. As soon as he started thinking about higher-order relationships in terms of objects called infinity-groupoids, he said, “many things started to fall into place.”

      Read before you talk.

  4. Dec 2020
    1. According to these digit span results, high immigrant Asian IQ is not just the product of Northeast Asians, as the LV national IQ numbers might have implied. The IQ of Indian immigrants is also high, which suggests that the United States enjoys positive selection from that part of the world. The IQ of sub-Saharan Africans is similarly much higher than the LV data would predict, though it is still low by native standards

      so it's confounded by the bias of smarter people moving first and doesn't tell too much. not fine grained enough to tease apart indian iq