Delete

Change this to-

Learning resources: https://www.peardeck.com/resources-community

This is in VidGrid, just FYI.

Change this to-

Guidance for getting started: https://support.goguardian.com/s/article/How-to-Create-a-New-Pear-Deck-Lesson-1629747054481

Sounds like "catalytic validity" from Patti Lather. Research is valid if it does something.

Underlined portions are the revisions.

This is a new framework to me- Framework of "critical stance."

themes

Justification for future work with teachers/faculty on DCP

tech evangelism

This is a great idea that I wouldn't have thought of.

Is this relevant for Remote Days?

Google Expeditions: https://artsandculture.google.com/project/expeditions

Could this also be a place for some student creativity, like a PowerPoint or a creative/annotated image to represent what they know?

Tinkercad is a tool we use to design in 3D and then 3D print in the Makerspace. Maybe that could also be a creative assignment?

This is where I think the Do from the Engaging section could go.

These links aren't working for me.

Duplicate from previous section.

Again, is this possible for Remote Days?

Will this be possible for Remote Days?

Access is denied for me here.

I'm wondering if this "Do" section should be in the "Creating" section.

presenting?

Is this pertinent to asynchronous work? I'm not sure Virtual Whiteboards are a good asynchronous option... maybe if students realize that they will be contributing at different times?

Missing links... or is the link below the tips?

Agree!

Yes, I think this is a key point here.

One word?

I think this might be more connected to universal design.

This could be deleted as well.

Yay! Got it.

Maybe this one should be called "Student Presentations," just to differentiate from content presented by the professor.

Should the polling capability be featured here?

Also- the ones linked to Zoom are messing with my head. It seems to me now that Zoom is the mechanism by which students can meet virtually, but I see how students could also present and meet in groups and faculty can present. Maybe because Zoom is just the water in which we swim (swam?) for the past year, it seems like a more general tool than one that can be named pedagogically.

I think the VidGrid Quizzing is an assessment, but not seeing VidGrid alone as assessment. - Nevermind, I see what this is for. If students create a video to be assessed. I didn't think of that at first.

Again, I'm just not familiar with Trello and if faculty in general are using it.

Again, just wondering if faculty are really using BBB.

I sort of wish this had another name because I think of it less as a quiz (like EdPuzzle too) and more of a way to make video instruction interactive. Perhaps we could put both of these in Presenting Content to Students as well?

Video not working.

Video not working.

This video isn't working.

Not sure a blog would be used for group collaboration, though I know that it could be...

I have examples of these, but I use it more for in class engagement and sharing in real time.

We could potentially include a flashcard site here too?

This seems beyond most faculty needs?

Is this a part of Office 365? We should probably not include it.

I think this category could probably be eliminated. It could go under writing or presenting, I think.

This one seems like it could probably go.

I haven't heard of this one, but perhaps some other common blogging tools instead/in addition to. Blogger? Oh wait, I see blogger below and I think it makes sense under writing.

I kind of think Audacity would mainly be used to create a podcast type assignment- so I think it would be better under group or individual digital projects in assessments.

Love Kahoot- but I'm wondering if this really counts as discussing. In my mind, it's either an informal assessment or a way to make presentations more interactive. I think it would probably be better under assessments.

I'm wondering if there are professors using Reddit. I know a couple (including myself) that use Twitter to engage students with global communities. I might include Twitter instead?

I was not familiar with this one, but I'm wondering if we should have this at all as it seems redundant to Canvas and Zoom. Do many professors use it already and like it?

This could also support in person class activities.

Thinking that this might potentially go better under assessing, in the section on projects.

This link isn't working.

Missing

Side note- I think it would be helpful if these links opened in a new tab. Especially on these pages where users will most likely be going through each link and wanting to keep some open.

If this is presenting content, is PowerPoint too obvious? Office Sway is included, so not sure.

Maybe Lecture Based Could be collapsed with Demonstration/Simulation. Or perhaps they could be something like "Creating Video Content" or "Curating Video Content"? I guess audio is in there too. Maybe just "Creating Content" or "Curating Content." In that case, Text based could include some open source textbook resources?? Not sure how that works with the bookstore and all that.

Not sure this category belongs here in presenting content. Not sure if it is needed in general.

I feel like Yammer didn't really take off, particularly for a tool for teaching. This can probably be removed.

The video in here isn't working.

This one requires a username and password and I'm not sure which one to use.

This is what this website now says: "The OhioLINK Digital Resource Commons (DRC) was taken offline on August 31, 2021."

I'm not that familiar with Twine, but in my mind I was thinking about how Teaching with Tech could be more user-friendly for professors and was thinking that a "Choose your own adventure" type of site might be helpful, maybe with Twine? Although, it essentially works like that with your three big categories and subcategories, so that might just be gimmicky.

Not sure about Flipgrid here. In my understanding, it's more like a discussion board, but with video instead of text, although students can now record their screens as well. I might move this to engaging with students.

This should certainly stay- just think maybe we should add some information about the "quiz" feature that makes these more interactive and like EdPuzzle.

To me, this is too advanced for a regular faculty member to use. Instructional designers may use this to design online courses, but I think it could be removed as it's only available as a trial or very expensive. I think VidGrid/EdPuzzle could be used to do what faculty might have in mind for this.

I wonder with zoom if anyone is using this.

Like we discussed, I think it would be helpful to have an X icon or something that indicates which are supported by Xavier, or perhaps a separate list of Xavier supported tools.

I think this form should perhaps be a bit shorter. I think just naming the tool and having faculty say how they use it would lower the barrier to sharing.

I think this form should perhaps be a bit shorter. I think just naming the tool and having faculty say how they use it would lower the barrier to sharing.

This link isn't working for me.

The learning cycle is in the Ohio Standards for Science.