65 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2015
    1. In an affinity space no one is stopped from gaining intensive knowledge because someone else thinks they are “my low students” or “struggling.”

      It is important that students realize that everyone has strengths and weakness and different needs.

    2. Furthermore, rarely is the core generator (e.g. the textbook or the curriculum guide) modified (“patched”) in an ongoing way based on student desires, pleasures, displeasures, actions, and interactions.

      Important to take students interests into consideration.

    3. Many children are exposed to language and other symbols connected to modern technologies and media (e.g. the Internet, video games, text messaging) that seem more compelling and motivating than school language.

      I have to talk to my students all the time about not including "text talk" in their academic work. "LOL" and "OMG" are not appropriate language for a formal assignment.

    4. The teacher heard her as rambling.

      I wonder what the teacher could have done to help Leona become aware of the many things she was doing unintentionally well in her story and help her develop those skills even farther.

    5. He ended up reading on the Internet, in books, and in his video games much more complicated and much more academic-like language than he read in his first-grade school texts.

      This is important. Students should be read appropriately challenging books and be exposed to academic language early.

    6. What is happening here is that a little girl, who cannot yet “really” read, is learning and practicing non-vernacular forms of language associated with school and schooling.

      She definitely seems to have reading readiness.

    1. teachers were assigned at random to introduce a set of strategies briefly and then quickly move students to applying or juggling multiple strategies simultaneously, which resulted in students with stronger performance on some measures.

      I never thought to do it that way, sounds a little overwhelming!

    2. For example, it is a rare day when a book about shark attacks or one by Steven Jenkins does not garner great interest in many students.

      I personally always found non-fiction texts to be very low-interest!

    3. teachers will have to employ a variety of instructional strategies, such as partner reading and collaborative strategy use, to pro-vide the extra measure of scaffolding needed to support students’ com-prehension of more challenging text

      It is possible for students to read texts above their level if the right supports are in place.

    4. In providing exposure to a range of texts, one important dimension to consider is the genre of the text, particularly its communicative purpose.

      This is something I need to do more of. It is important for students to learn genre features and strategies for comprehending specific genres. And it's important for students to learn what their reading likes/dislikes are.

    5. replaces literacy instruction with a two-hour block of inte-grated science–literacy instruction.

      I think this is a great idea. I hate how teaching science has become a "when I get to it" kind of thing. It's not prioritized because it's not tested as heavily as math and ELA.

    6. comprehension of the expository text, in contrast to the narrative text, was significantly related to the student’s amount of world knowledge

      I have had students who comprehend expository better but I always thought it was because expository is more concrete and requires less inferencing.

    7. Skilled readers are also more motivated and engaged readers, reading more actively and more voluminously, thus further developing their knowledge and skill

      We have to make sure all kids feel confident in their ability to read.

    8. We use our knowledge of the world, along with our knowledge of how language and text work, to make all the local inferences required to connect the sentences to one another—to build, if you will, a coherent representation of what the text says.

      Inferencing is critical to reading comp.

    1. We must more proactively integrate language, literacy, and content learning in the early grades and, indeed, later on, as well.

      I have noticed that even secondary educators are being required to take classes on literacy in the content areas now.

    2. Indeed, the Internet requires a good deal of technical reading for a student to fully leverage its possibilities for learning and knowledge production, or even to access, assess, and modify the plethora of information it makes available

      I wasn't totally convinced of the connection--I've had students who are great with navigating technology but low readers, but this makes sense.

    3. But such “catch-up” interventions, which immerse children in school-based language as it applies to the world and to problem-solving, must continue from kindergarten through middle school to be effective

      I always thought of language interventions as early elementary, important to remember that they can't stop there!

    4. This breadth of vocabulary is created by parents talking to children, answering their questions, reading to them, modeling their own pleasure in reading, and offering their children a wide variety of experiences in the world.

      How can we portray the importance of these to parents?

    1. synchronyof reading, writing, andspelling development

      I do see how encoding helps with decoding, but I did have a student last year who was fantastic at spelling but struggled with reading because of comprehension. Just seemed like a bit of an overgeneralization because reading involves more than just decoding.

    2. Knowing the stage of spelling of each of your students will determine your choices of ap-propriate word study activities.

      Hm, I have all my students do the same activities just with different sets of words.

    3. One unique quality of word study as we describe it lies in what we believeis the critical role of differentiating instruction for different levels of word knowledge.

      Students take a spelling inventory that clearly shows where each student is at and the teacher can form groups accordingly.

    4. The purpose of word study, then, is to examine words in order to reveal consistencieswithin our written language system and to help students master the recognition,spelling, and meaning of specific words.

      The program does highlight high-frequency words and emphasizes homophones.

    5. The most effective instruction in phonics, spelling, and vo-cabulary links word study to the texts being read, provides a systematic scope and se-quence of word-level skills, and provides multiple opportunities for hands-on practiceand application.

      We use Words Their Way at my school and I agree that it does have a logical scope/sequence, provides plenty of hands-on practice, and it is helpful for the students to read the words in context.

    6. Designing a word studyprogram that explicitly teaches students necessary skills and engages their interest andmotivation to learn about how words work is a vital aspect of any literacy program.

      Must be fun, but also effective.

    7. During word study, words and pictures are sorted in routines that re-quire children to examine, discriminate, and make critical judgmentsabout speech sounds, word structures, spelling patterns, and meanings.

      They're doing so much more than just memorizing a list of words.

    8. Students need hands-on opportunities to manipulate word features in a way that al-lows them to generalize beyond isolated, individual examples to entire groups of wordsthat are spelled the same way

      Students can apply their learning to words not on their "list". The spelling test often includes words they fit the pattern but weren't studied throughout the week.

    1. Itmay be helpful to increase the use of concreteobjects or other cues to represent sounds and toprovide more phonemic awareness instructionthat includes familiar letters. Also, by focusingon sounds that can be elongated, teachers aremore likely to draw students’ attention to thosesounds

      Great strategies and suggestions for struggling students.

    2. In linguistically rich classrooms, phonemicawareness activities will be incorporated inten-tionally into literature sharing experiences, musicexperiences, movement experiences, and otherexperiences throughout the day.

      Genuine experiences.

    3. Itis the qualityof instruction and the responsive-nessof the instruction to the individuals in theclassroom that should have greater considerationthan the amount of time.

      Important to monitor progress and adjust accordingly.

    4. the difficulty of the task depends inpart upon the number of sounds (fewer soundsare easier than more), which sounds they are(liquids are typically easier than nasals or stops),and their location in the word (middle sounds aremore difficult to attend to than initial or finalsounds).

      Good to remember for scaffolding/differentiation.

    5. They may be asked toblend sounds together to form a word (e.g., Whatword would we have if we put these sounds to-gether? /j/-/u/-/m/-/p/). They may be asked tosegment words into their constituent parts (e.g.,Tell all the sounds you hear in the word dog).

      Blending and segmenting are most important phonemic awareness skills.

    6. Phonemicawareness development is not meaningful in andof itself. It is important only in the context ofcomprehensive reading instruction.

      Interesting. I always thought students had to have strong phonemic awareness before they were ready to move on to other components of reading like phonics.

    7. Adams andBruck (1995), for instance, submitted that songs,chants, and word-sound games are ideally suit-ed toward developing young children’s sensitiv-ity to the sound structure of language. Beck andJuel (1995) posited that time spent on word play,nursery or Dr. Seuss rhymes, and general expo-sure to storybooks contribute to phonemicawareness. Mattingly (1984) encouraged class-room teachers to provide their students with lin-guistic stimulation in the form of storytelling,word games, rhymes, and riddles in order to fa-cilitate phonemic awareness.

      Consensus seems to be that songs, chants, rhymes, riddles, and word games/play help develop phonemic awareness.

    1. Such domain-specific or task-specific qualifi-cation of student ability added to the conditionality of learning.

      It's completely possible for students to excel in some areas and struggle in others. It seems like students were looked at more individually and more specifically, which likely helped improve instruction based on particular needs.

    2. Schools clearly functioned as social institutions centeredaround the interactions of students and teachers.

      Interesting shift. Those interactions are so important for students to develop social skills and are likely to increase motivation.

    3. The goal of learning was no longerseen as the development of an individually held body of knowledge, but rather thecreation of a mutual understanding arising in the social interaction of particularindividuals in a particular context at a particular time.

      This is interesting. Doesn't sound like kids were taught to be critical thinkers.

    4. aspectrum of general text-processing strategies, including summarization, map-ping, self-questioning, and predicting

      So the focus was on comprehension strategies rather than decoding strategies?

    5. Text-based learningwas about knowledge, which was organized and stored within the individualmind, and resulted from the input, interpretation, organization, retention, and out-put of information from the individual’s environment

      Seems like reading was thought of more as knowledge than a skill.

    6. his new perspective held littleregard for the innateness or naturalness of reading and little interest in the amal-gamation of literacy fields

      I think recent research on dyslexia and reading disabilities has proved that there is some degree of innateness to reading.

    7. Learning to read was not so much a matter ofbeing taught, but a matter of arriving at facility as a result of a predisposition toseek understanding within a language-rich environment.

      More student-centered, higher motivation

    8. Language, as with other innatehuman capacities, was to be developed through meaningful use, not practiced tothe point of mindless reaction

      But what if a child is not sufficiently exposed to meaningful language outside of school?

    9. Such perceptual activities included the identification of visualsignals; the translation of these signals into sounds; and assembly of these soundsinto words, phrases, and sentences

      No fluency, vocabulary, comprehension yet?

    10. often linked with theapplication of carefully chosen rewards and punishments,

      I wonder if this presented a problem for struggling readers. Being "punished" for having difficulty surely would have made them dislike reading.