22 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. . I’m perfectly willing to go through with it if it means anything to you.” “Doesn’t it mean anything to you? We could get along.” “Of course it does. But I don’t want anybody but you. I don’t want any one else.

      Issue: it inhibits his lifestyle

    2. But if I do it, then it will be nice again if I say things are like white elephants, and you’ll like it?”

      If I have an abortion, then she is back to being tolerated?

    3. “if you don’t want to you don’t have to. I wouldn’t have you do it if you didn’t want to. But I know it’s perfectly simple.”

      puts the responsibility on the girl

  2. Aug 2026
    1. … I have wounded everyone … poor Charlie, what can I do for you? … if giving myself to you would bring you a moment's happiness, could I? … the idea used to be revolting … now, nothing about love seems important enough to be revolting … poor Charlie, he only thinks he ought to desire me! … dear Charlie, what a perfect lover he would make for one's old age! … what a perfect lover when one was past passion! …

      ???????????

    1. This modernist choice of styles is not a sign of instability, (page 12)p. 12but an aspect of freedom. Diversity of style is liberal democracy in art – and, as we shall see, it was the Soviet and Nazi dictatorships that demanded an explicitly anti-modernist reversion to an official unity of realist style in the arts.

      it's anti-communist to be modernist

    2. the canon of past art is always available for reinterpretation, imitation, and even parody or pastiche

      modernism is aware of and references the canonical past (but makes fun of it)

    3. relationship between words and music is deliberately untautological and ambiguous; the words can say one thing, the music something else.

      purposefully ambiguous

    4. the construction of a painting in terms of a linear grid or framework, the fusion of objects with their surroundings, the combination of several views of an object within a single image, and of abstract and representational elements in the same picture

      Einstein and relativity. Everything and nothing, all at once. Perhaps a more "human" experience? Psychological?

    5. because the cubists had destroyed, from 1906 to 1912, the realist conventions for three-dimensional perspective which had been dominant in art since the Renaissance.

      destroy knowledge as we know it