ith its defined policy.4in situations when the case is not mnot accept an out-of-scope collectiotheir repository's collection developan occasional "tool" rathe
Sauer challenges archivists to examine their own professional integrity when she questions whether collection development policies are treated as required guiding principles or merely convenient tools for assistance. If these policies are applied inconsistently, their authority and purpose weaken. They risk being perceived not as solid institutional commitments, but as flexible guidelines that can be adjusted at will. The major gap between principle and practice seems to encompass Sauer’s broader argument that collection development policies are crucial aspects to archiving in theory, but their impact solely depends on how seriously repositories commit to applying them in daily work. I can see how consistently committing to a policy could help set clearer expectations for donors, administrators, and even staff within the repository.