10 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2022
    1. y the Creative Commons search for work licensed for reuse via Creative Commons licenses. When you see a meme going around, give a thought to the subject of that meme image, whose life may forever be changed.

      This is a smart option for new subscribers who really are unfamiliar with fair-use and copyright laws its always good to take precaution

    2. The purpose of the use, The amount of the w

      This is intriguing to me because it says that within certain parameters, it can be okay but not always, but I believe that every situation is unique and can be categorized differently.

    1. Yet the identities of both were inevitably pursued and eventually discovered. At a certain level of virality, you cannot stop motivated people on the internet from piercing your veils. In the case of that woman from Blair’s flight, her legions of “fans” are digging day and night to find more information, to meet the female lead of this summer’s hotte

      We live in an era when your entire life can be changed forever and exposed for millions of people to judge and scrutinize, with or without your consent. When you look beneath the surface of this ostensibly "rom-com" type story, it is frightening to consider how people you don't even know are imposing what you should or shouldn't do until there is nothing left and they move on to the next shiny thing.

    2. harm disguises the invasion of privacy at its heart: the way technology is both eroding our personal boundaries and coercing us in deleterious

      wow this is so real; I understand that new tech is extremely important and necessary these days, but it is also highly hazardous; there are plenty bad people who have strong skills with it who can put us in danger and violate our privacy.

    1. The ethics — and even the definition — of doxxing is murky. It is the dissemination of often publicly available information. And, some at the protest as

      I believe that since information is available online somehow doesn't give us the right to target someone. the information can be used to protect people. Doxxing someone you know online who is planning to shoot up a school to protect those they may harm at the school should be legal. Doxxing someone you don't know, on the other hand, may result in misidentification and negative consequences for the misidentified person.

    2. participating in the neo-Nazi march. And some worry

      This is sickening, and it demonstrates the dangers of the internet and doxxing. Imagine being misclassified and having your entire reputation tarnished. How does one go about repairing this? You are not safe any longer.

    1. The present study examined longitudinal rela-tions between ethnic-racial discrimination and eth-nic-racial identity during adolescence, buildingupon existing literature regarding these relations inseveral ways. First, existing longitudinal studieshave tested the identity–discrimination relationsduring middle or late adoles

      give good example and discussion about racial issue

    Annotators

    1. The FBI said it has stopped using the "Black Identity Extremist" tag and acknowledged that white supremacist violence is the biggest terrorist threat this country faces.

      The Root was a black justice community organizer, but after scrolling over the check, I discovered it is a digital magazine platform something which shares previously believed information from numerous black perspectives. I was using the majority opinion for other coverage and discovered that there is no actual news on this and that the link in the tweet shared is to their blog post.

    1. More people than you would think believe that the blue checkmark = trustworthy. But all the blue checkmark really does is say that the person is who they say they are, that they are the person of that name and not an imposter.

      The phrase "legitimate news site" is the nagging grey area here. It is indeed a broad statement which can be implemented to just about any news source, regardless about whether the information is correct. Majority of the nation may believe that CNBC isn't really a trustworthy source, whereas Fox News is. Tucker Carlson and Christina Wilkie both have a blue check mark on Twitter and are verified for government/news/entertainment.