Beat by what? The difficulty of deciding the innocence of the defendant?
Pris'ner is repeated here. Perhaps this word was used again to reiterate that this is the same man both lawyers are talking about, despite the opposing viewpoints that they display.
Here is where the change happens. No longer does see the man as wicked, but now he also sees how the man could possibly be a hero of sorts. For me, this line is what puts a firm image in my head. I imagine a man in a courtroom after terrible things are being said about him. When his lawyer speaks up and gives a diffferent perspective, everyone sees the man as good
How can he be seen as awful and righteous at the same exact time?
The way the lawyers control the narrative is amazing. They're good at their jobs, and can make anyone seem good or bad depending on what they've been hired to do. The truth will be lost in situations like this, because the lawyer with the more convincing argument (or is just better at their job) will win the case, rather than the one that tells the most truth.