The measures which the museum curator takes to present the thing to the public areself-liquidating. The upshot of the curator’s efforts are not that everyone can see theexhibit but that no one can see it. The curator protests: why are they so indifferent?W hy do they even d eface the exhibit? D on’t they know it is theirs? But it is not theirs.It is his, the cura tor’s. By the most exclusive sort of zoning, the museum exhibit, thepark oak tree, is part of an ensemble, a package, which is almost impenetrable to them.The archaeolo gist who p uts his find in a museum so that everyone can see itaccomplishes the reverse of his expectations. The result of his action is that no one cansee it now but the archeologist. He would have done better to kee p it in his pocket andshow it now and then to strangers.
This makes me think of how history is written and taught, "history is written by the victor" as the saying goes, so when we only are taught or learn that part of history we only get the package that is documented, and therefore don't actually learn the entirety of the history, we just learn one part and we can't fully grasp the situation. It's similar here, the museum is allowing everyone to see the artifacts and exhibits but they can't fully understand them because it's being presented in a carefully manicured way.