. In intervocalic position short consonants were prone to extensive lenition, involving voicing, fricativization, and sometimes total loss, with significant variation between and sometimes within regions: i. -[p]- > -[b]- > -[v]- > Ø, e.g. Rmg. [ʃaˈvoŋ], Mil. [saˈũ],Ven. [saˈoŋ] < saponem ‘soap’;ii. -[t]- > -[d]- > -[ð]- > Ø (although in the absence of apocope of the following vowel, restoration as [d] is common, especially in Lombard and Venetan, or as a glide in Piedmont), e.g. Gen. [veˈɲyu], [veˈɲya] ‘come.pst.ptcp.m/fsg’ < *veˈnutu/-a, Mil. [senˈti], [senˈtida] ‘heard.pst.ptcp.m/fsg’ < *senˈtitu/-a, Vnz. [maˈɲa], [maˈɲada] ‘eaten.pst.ptcp.m/fsg’< *manduˈkatu/-a, but the nearby dialect of Burano has msg [maˈɲao] ~ fsg [maˈɲa], while urban Veronese has [maˈɲado] ~ [maˈɲada] (Marcato and Ursini 1998:306);iii. [k] > [ɡ] > [ɣ] > Ø in Piedmont, if in the vicinity of the front vowels, [i], [y], [ø], e.g. Lmb. [furˈmiɡa], Ven. [forˈmiɡa], Pie. [fyrˈmia] < formicam ‘ant’. As mentioned above, Latin intervocalic geminates were shortened over the whole area, usually remaining distinct from the original short consonants. Significantly,
?