The Luddites were a group of English textile workers in the 19th century who fought against machines that threatened their jobs. They believed these machines were used unfairly by factory owners to replace skilled workers and lower wages by producing lower-quality goods. To protest, Luddites secretly destroyed the machines. They named themselves after Ned Ludd, a mythical weaver, and used his name in threatening letters to factory owners and officials. Their actions highlighted the struggles workers faced during the Industrial Revolution, as they tried to protect their livelihoods from technological changes.

Sometimes, even good intentions lead to bad outcomes. Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin hoping to reduce slavery, but it ended up increasing it. Alfred Nobel created dynamite for construction but saw it used in war, which led him to start the Nobel Prizes to encourage peace. Albert Einstein helped push for nuclear weapons, something he later regretted deeply. Aza Raskin's infinite scroll, meant to make browsing easier, now keeps people glued to their screens. These stories show how even the best ideas can have unexpected and sometimes harmful consequences.

This page discusses the definition of Wage labor. Wage labor involves workers selling their labor power to employers under contracts, formal or informal. This employment relationship occurs in labor markets where wages or salaries are determined. Workers exchange their labor for pay, with the work product becoming the employer's property, highlighting the transactional nature of modern employment. Personally, I think there could be better ways of organizing labor, such as adding more safety nets.

Capitalism prioritizes private ownership, where businesses set their own production and pricing strategies. Competition drives innovation and consumer choice, but also highlights economic disparities. Wage laborers receive fixed incomes, while owners reap profits or suffer losses, underscoring inherent inequalities and the tension between capital and labor within the system. I definitely have mixed views on this system, there are many upsides and downsides.

I believe doxing is a very bad consequence of our digital world. It involves publicly sharing someone's personal information online without their consent, often leading to severe consequences for the victim. This information can come from public databases, social media, or even private details obtained through hacking. While some forms of data aggregation might be legal, they can still be associated with stalking and intimidation. Doxing is often used for malicious purposes like online shaming, extortion, or vigilante actions. This harmful practice highlights the darker side of our connected world and the need for stronger protections against such invasions of privacy.

Individual harassment has always existed, but social media has introduced new methods for it. These include bullying, where mean messages are sent through DMs, and cyberstalking, which involves persistently finding and following someone's account. Hacking into accounts to uncover secrets or make threats is another method. Tracking involves monitoring a victim's social media to control their interactions, often using spy software. There are also severe threats like death and rape threats. These new tools make harassment easier and more pervasive, highlighting the need for stronger protections and awareness on social media platforms.

Personally, I think harassment done online is a growing issue in today's world.

The historical examples of crowdsourcing showcase humanity's knack for collaborative problem-solving long before the internet era. Take the Tang Dynasty's joint-stock company, a primitive form of crowdfunding born out of necessity during cold periods that disrupted agriculture. Similarly, in 1567, King Philip II of Spain dangled a cash prize to spur innovation in calculating longitude at sea, demonstrating early recognition of the power of incentives to mobilize collective effort.

The British government's longitude rewards in 1714 further underscored this concept, offering a bounty for a solution to a navigational conundrum. Even King Louis XVI of France got in on the action in 1783, offering a prize for a cost-effective method of producing alkali from sea salt. These instances illustrate how authorities leveraged financial incentives to tap into the wisdom of the masses.

Beyond monetary rewards, initiatives like Matthew Fontaine Maury's distribution of Wind and Current Charts in the 19th century and Joseph Henry's Meteorological Project in 1849 exemplify crowdsourcing's altruistic side. Maury's provision of charts in exchange for sailors' voyage logs and Henry's network of weather observers, enabled by telegraph communication, demonstrate early forms of collaborative data gathering for societal benefit.

These historical vignettes reveal that crowdsourcing isn't just a modern phenomenon; it's a timeless strategy rooted in human ingenuity and collaboration.

Crowdsourcing is like a giant potluck where everyone brings a dish to share. It's this cool concept where instead of one person doing all the work, a bunch of folks chip in with their own small contributions. Think of Wikipedia – anyone with internet access can edit it. People from all walks of life come together, some are asked to join, others just jump in because they're interested.

It's fascinating because it taps into the power of the crowd. You've got this huge pool of potential talent, and by opening up the task to everyone, you're more likely to get diverse perspectives and skills. Plus, it's a win-win – the crowd gets to be part of something bigger, and the task gets done quicker and often better because of all the different inputs.

It's kind of like a modern-day barn raising, where the whole community comes together to build something awesome. Except instead of a barn, it might be designing a logo, solving a problem, or creating content. It's pretty cool how technology has made it possible for us to collaborate on such a massive scale, even if we're miles apart.

The evolution of cetaceans, which began around 50 million years ago from even-toed ungulates in the Indian subcontinent, illustrates a fascinating transition from land to aquatic life over at least 15 million years. Cetaceans, including both baleen and toothed whales, are now fully aquatic marine mammals that belong to the order Artiodactyla. This group shares a recent common ancestor with hippopotami, underscoring their connection as sister groups. Despite their adaptation to a fully aquatic lifestyle, cetaceans retain many ancestral skeletal features, such as having five finger bones in their fins, and exhibit typical mammalian traits like surfacing to breathe air, nursing their young, and maintaining a complex bone structure.

Research from the late 1970s in Pakistan highlighted the transitional stages of cetaceans from terrestrial to marine environments. The diversification of cetaceans into two main groups—Mysticeti (baleen whales) and Odontoceti (toothed whales)—occurred between 28 and 33 million years ago during a second radiation event. This separation led to distinct adaptations such as the development of echolocation in toothed whales and gradual evolution of baleen in baleen whales, which became crucial for their filter-feeding mechanism. The increase in baleen size and dependence is directly linked to their dietary strategies, showcasing a remarkable evolutionary journey from land-dwelling to dominating marine environments.

Richard Dawkins' perspective in "The Selfish Gene," emphasizing genes as the primary units of natural selection, radically shifts our understanding of evolution. By suggesting that evolutionary success can be evaluated at the gene level rather than at the level of the organism, Dawkins challenges traditional interpretations and highlights how genes, not just individuals, drive evolutionary outcomes. This concept notably explains behaviors that might seem self-sacrificial at the organism level but are beneficial in terms of gene survival, such as a bee dying to protect its hive. Dawkins extends this framework of genetic evolution to cultural evolution, introducing the term "meme" to draw a parallel between the replication of genes and the spread of cultural ideas. This analogy enriches our understanding of how information, whether biological or cultural, evolves and persists across generations.

Systemic bias refers to the tendency of certain processes to consistently yield specific outcomes, often favoring particular social groups while disadvantaging others. This bias is prevalent within human systems like institutions, overlapping with institutional and structural bias. Institutional bias occurs when the practices of specific institutions result in advantages for some groups and disadvantages for others. When these biases are ingrained in laws and norms, they can manifest as institutional racism. Structural bias, particularly in relation to racial disparities, involves the normalization of policies and attitudes that consistently harm minority populations. These issues are extensively studied in industrial organization economics.

Exploring the secretive world of social media algorithms reveals a delicate balance between transparency and security. While understanding their inner workings could foster trust and informed engagement, concerns about exploitation by malicious users persist. The parallels between these algorithms and the hidden mechanics of a complex dungeon are striking; both hold keys to unlocking mysteries and shaping experiences. As dungeon masters of our own digital realms, we navigate the fine line between revealing enough to empower users and safeguarding against potential misuse. It's a delicate dance in the ever-evolving landscape of online interaction.

Saying autism isn't a disability can be helpful for some who feel the label doesn’t fit their experience, but this view might overlook the real challenges others face. Many people with autism need support and resources that come with being recognized as having a disability. While it's good to rethink how we view neurodiversity, we must also ensure that everyone on the autism spectrum gets the help they need, regardless of the severity of their symptoms. This is important because it affects how we advocate for and support the autistic community.

The idea that disabilities are defined not only by individual limitations but also by social expectations is both intriguing and significant. It underscores the societal component of what we classify as a disability. This perspective is enlightening because it prompts us to reconsider how we define normalcy and ability. It suggests that if society were structured differently, accommodating various capabilities more comprehensively, fewer conditions might be considered disabling. This reflection leads me to question: How many everyday struggles are exacerbated simply because our environments and societal structures are not designed inclusively enough to accommodate different types of human functioning?

This article delves into the complex issue of data collection by Facebook, even for individuals who do not have an account on the platform. It highlights the pervasive nature of data tracking and the challenges users face in maintaining privacy online.

The term "shadow profile" is introduced to describe the data trove that Facebook gathers on non-users, essentially creating virtual profiles based on information collected from various sources, including browsing history and contact uploads. While Facebook denies explicitly creating these profiles, it acknowledges collecting data for analytics and security purposes.

The article outlines two primary methods through which Facebook gathers data on non-users: tracking browsing history through social APIs and collecting contact information uploaded by users. Despite assurances from Facebook that browsing data is deleted after a certain period, concerns linger regarding the continuous collection and retention of such data.

One of the most significant takeaways is the lack of opt-out options for users who wish to avoid data collection. Even abstaining from using the internet does not guarantee privacy, as friends or family members may inadvertently share contact information with Facebook.

Overall, the article underscores the need for greater transparency and user control over data collection practices, as well as the importance of ongoing discussions surrounding online privacy rights.

This comment provides an overview of the types of data that users may directly provide to a platform. Users typically offer information such as their email address, name, profile picture, interests, and friends. This data is crucial for platforms to personalize user experiences, facilitate communication, and tailor content recommendations. It also underscores the importance of transparent data usage policies and robust privacy measures to safeguard user information. Additionally, platforms must prioritize user consent and data protection to foster trust and maintain ethical practices.

The Martin Luther King Jr. assassination conspiracy theories are a wild ride of allegations, counter-evidence, and speculation. Loyd Jowers' claim about government involvement in King's death raises some serious doubts about the official narrative. It's intriguing to see how different perspectives emerge, with some pointing fingers at various government agencies while others dismiss such claims outright. The complexity of the case leaves room for skepticism and further investigation, especially considering the conflicting testimonies and lack of concrete evidence. It's a reminder that history isn't always as straightforward as it seems, and sometimes the truth is buried beneath layers of controversy and conspiracy.

Wow, reading this chapter really made me think about how much society can squash our creative instincts. It's like, we're born with this potential to think outside the box, but then we're constantly told to conform and stick to the status quo. It's kind of depressing, honestly. But then again, maybe that's why trolling exists. People who feel stifled or overlooked might resort to trolling as a way to rebel against the system and get some attention, even if it's negative. I mean, it's not the healthiest coping mechanism, but it's definitely a reaction to feeling creatively suppressed. Just a thought.

Conspiracy theories have woven themselves into the fabric of American politics since the nation's inception. From doubts surrounding the moon landing to suspicions of government involvement in JFK's assassination, they've captured public imagination. In the 1820s and 1830s, as political parties solidified and voting rights expanded, conspiracy accusations thrived. Parties like the Democrats and Whigs weaponized these narratives to sway voters, leading to economic downturns and eroding trust in democracy. Even earlier, the Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans engaged in conspiratorial rhetoric. The contested election of 1824, marked by accusations of a "corrupt bargain," epitomized how conspiracies could shape political landscapes and elections, laying bare the vulnerabilities of democracy.

The advent of SMS messaging revolutionized communication in the digital age, offering a convenient and instantaneous way to connect with loved ones. Its rise paralleled the emergence of online communities, where news outlets and fan pages fostered engagement through integrated comment sections. These features not only democratized discourse but also empowered individuals to share opinions and perspectives on a global scale. The integration of SMS and online commenting platforms marked a pivotal shift in how we interacted with both our inner circles and broader communities, shaping the landscape of communication and social interaction in the 21st century.

This quotation from Jesus is one of the most influential statements in world history. I believe this rule is one of the foundations of ethics, because it says that the way you act towards other people should be the same way you want other people to act towards you, allowing for a harmonious society.

In the section on ethical frameworks, particularly Virtue Ethics, it's crucial to recognize its adaptability and cultural relevance across various communities, beyond the examples provided. While the framework rightly highlights Aristotelian virtues and modern interpretations like Quaker SPICES and the US Army's LDRSHIP, it may also benefit from exploring how these virtues are echoed or reinterpreted in other cultures or systems. For instance, Confucian ethics, centered on virtues such as Ren (benevolence), Yi (righteousness), and Li (proper behavior), shares parallels with Aristotelian virtue ethics in its focus on character and moral development. Including a comparative analysis could enrich the discussion by demonstrating the universality and diversity of virtue ethics, underscoring its significance and applicability in a global context. This comparison not only broadens our understanding of what constitutes virtue across different societies but also highlights the universal quest for a flourishing life through ethical living.