10 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2021
    1. Many of the “tried and true” techniques and curriculum in classrooms perpetuate privilege rather than focusing on learning, autonomy, and empowerment. 

      I've had conversations before about history/social studies curriculum, and many feel like children should be taught dates, wars, and the names of important people (usually men). That model of history does little to empower people, and does little to educate students on the world they live in. I feel like we have to question our perspectives when it comes to every topic and technique.

    1. I explain how even if all students could get the same hardware and software, it would fail to even the academic playing field.

      Does this mean that there shouldn't be a push for parity in hardware and software? I feel like there still should be, but it shouldn't be thought of as the end all be all of educational equity.

    1. shrink long-standing equity and accessibility gaps, and adapt learning experiences to meet the needs of all learners

      This optimism, while well-placed, concerns me. We have seen and discussed how technology can erase some inequities while also opening whole new ones. Care must be taken not to think that technology can solve all problems in education.

    1. "Who has been served, supported, or allowed to thrive by our educational designs and who has not?

      I think this must be the core question not of just technology, but of education as a whole and even all of society. We have to do better about ensuring access.

    1. Recent years have seen a steady rise in remote proctoring and other surveillant education tech services within higher education

      I have not yet been asked to use a proctoring program, but I have been asked to turn on my camera, and I have taken tests where cameras have to be on. I can understand the need for it, but there is an amount of worry that it creates.

    1. do you need technology at all?

      I would say that we don't in the amount we currently use it, in general and in the classroom. Just because something is easier or newer does not mean it's better.

    1. In educational settings, constructivist learning activities and environments allow students to build their own knowledge, understandings, and interpretations of information

      I really like constructivism. I do, though, have some confusion about how to integrate digital tools with constructivism... I feel like in-person experiences might be more valuable than digital, which we're seeing now with Zoom.

  2. Feb 2021
    1. a single sign on from third party companies, such as Google or Facebook, to create an account, which gives the tool partial or full access to the data from these third party companies

      Despite the issues with this type of sign in, I usually find it to be relieving, since it is so much easier that most other forms of creating accounts/logging in. I do think the amount of information given and traded.

    2. most PDFs are not designed with accessibility in mind

      This applies even more generally to students. Myself and probably everyone have read PDF files that are impossible, or very difficult, to highlight and annotate. It must be much more awful to be even unable to read them.

    1. Social Presence

      Right now, the social presence and the social use of online tools is incredibly important. I've even, personally, seen change over the course of the COVID19 pandemic in how the social side of online learning presents itself. People now seem much more social in breakout rooms and small groups, something that seems different from the fall.