117 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2019
    1. woman who married and took her husband's name could not hold the title Matron.

      Whoa, talk about a departure from traditional "American" societal norms. I could be wrong, but it seems like they are saying that taking a mans last name is a degradation to the political standing of a woman. You would never see this in today's society. I'm not for or against it, as I do not have the proper context, but worth noting that this is a very different way of doing things.

    2. They did not believe that children are born in sin

      Well this is nice to hear. I can only say that I agree with this statement and with the natives' style of child rearing. Children should be allowed to be loud and crazy and they should be given guidance not punishment to help them grow and learn.

    3. "no soldiers, no gendarmes or police, no nobles, kings, regents, prefects, or judges, no prisons, no lawsuits ... All are equal and free,"

      This seems a bit radical but, of course, I agree with the everyone being equal aspect of it. I have a feeling I am misinterpreting this quote and/or not picking up on some sort of symbolism.

    4. a people is not conquered until the hearts of the women are on the ground,

      what a brutal, yet vivid saying. It's intensity really signifies their reverence for the women in their community.

    5. but it has the advantage of providing a solid sense of identity and lowered levels of psychological and interpersonal conflict.

      It does seem when you meet people that are close with their family and have a connection to their family's past, they are often very content people. This is obviously a generalization but a strong sense of family seems to have a very positive effect on people.

    6. e term refers in every individual case to an entire generation of women whose psychic, and conse-quently physical, "shape" made the psychic existence of the following generation possible.

      If what this means is that the entire group of women who help raise you are apart of this concept of "mother" then it seems similar to have a step-parent. Sometimes people don't know their biological parents, who are obviously responsible for passing down genetics, so they attribute who they are to the people who were around to raise them.

    Annotators

    1. The tide began to turn when Mrs. Fournier refused to give up Ivan Brown in 1968.

      This probably sounds cliche but this sounds similar to Rosa Parks refusing to give up her seat to a white person. Her act of (justified) defiance would ignite a movement that would enact tangible and well-deserved change just as Mrs. Fournier's did years later.

    2. it was in an Indian child’s best interest to remain within his or her biologi-cal or extended family, if possible.

      Absolutely. It's sad that the Indian community had to go to such great lengths just to validate themselves and their ability to raise children. The fact that the (mostly) white community took such issue with this, to the extent that they did, is appalling.

    3. naiwa does favor Indian Tribal Councils and would never work against [them], because we believe if the Tribal Council is lost then tribal identity is lost

      Solidarity goes a long way and is often the most powerful endorsement one can give.

    4. recognized as a woman of a peculiar and special nobility instead of the object of a sheriff ’s pursuit.”

      Crazy that this woman wasn't receiving awards for what she had contributed to the community and to the lives of the children that she had fostered. Also, had the welfare agency conducted any sort of interviews with the children that were grown that had been under the foster care of Mrs. Fournier?

    5. create alternative Indian- run programs to provide social services to Indian families in crisis.

      This seems integral to the solution for Native families at risk of being bullied by the government and the agencies that are trying to take their babies. I have a feeling that the non-Indian social services available to them were far less helpful than the ones created by and for Indian families.

    6. Admittedly, we would see sorrow and hardship— but also pulsing life, joy, and beauty.

      We discussed this further in class and I believe this last sentence is absolutely true. Most people do not live in utter sorrow, regardless of their hardship. The human resolve is so great and I feel like the communal qualities that the Native community upholds would bring many people joy.

    7. Despite such statistics, however, the public perception persists that Indian communities suffer from rampant alcohol abuse

      So many times in this class we are reminded that people will either make up blatant lies or conveniently use statistics to make a point. It's frustrating because people can sound very legit when doing this and you either don't have the time to fact check them or simply believe what they're saying.

    Annotators

    1. They are not just giving you money,” my mom said, her voice firm and unyielding when I repeated that statement to her. “That’s not free. Those are your treaty rights; a lot of Indian people have died for those rights, and don’t you ever forget that!”

      Well at least her mom is being honest with her.

    2. e sits behind me in math class and puts a lot of confusing thoughts in my head. Although he lives in town and not on the reservation, he’s a real Indian. He looks like it, he talks like it, and he acts like it, swaggering arrogance combined with a sweet tongue.

      Interesting that she attributes his "swaggering arrogance and sweet tongue" to his Indian identity. I wouldn't say I'm well versed on Indian stereotypes having grown up in suburban Northern California but these were not ones I have heard. At least they seem to be fairly complimentary. Apparently this gives him the bad boy look, which apparently is working out.

    3. “Well, Suz!” Dad greeted me with a huge smile. “You’re up late. What do you think?

      Sad because I can totally visualize the dad proud of himself and happy, but unfortunately inebriated at 3am. People should have this sort of enthusiasm for what they're doing when sober at 3pm.

    4. Why isn’t your family enough? Why can’t you just be thankful for what you have?

      What a burdensome thought to have. It seems so natural to wonder about the people who brought you into this world and to feel like your curiosity is shameful is no way to process such a situation.

    5. It’s better you don’t get a hold of him

      This seems very concerning. This could be to protect her from opening up a pandoras box that could ultimately lead to pain, or it could be his defense mechanism in an attempt to keep his daughter from wandering astray.

    6. “What do you mean, your ‘real parents’

      The concept of biological parents versus those who watch over us as children with unconditional love is such a tough one to grapple with. One of my best friends found out that the man who raised him was not his biological father. He didn't know this until he was 18 years old. For him it wasn't an issue at all and he had zero resentment for having been "lied" to. It is surely different for everyone, but such a sensitive topic for all.

  2. Nov 2019
    1. ulie no longer trusts the IHs and goes there only for routine health problems such as the flu or strep throat.4

      I'm surprised she trusts them to help her with the common cold.

    2. Some Indian leaders believe that the sterilization of Native American women also affects the tribe's economic base and sovereignty.

      It absolutely affects their sovereignty! If you take away their power to reproduce you are stripping them of their most basic human right. If you can take that away what else might you be willing to take away?

    3. The weaknesses in the sterilization consent forms included the failure to di- vulge fully the required information on the risks involved in the procedure and the alternative methods of birth control that the individual could use. T

      This is definitely one of the most difficult issues to grapple with: that instead of providing these men and women with much less invasive forms of contraception, they instead chose to coerce them into undergoing an irreversible operation.

    4. The GAO investigators examined 113 of the 3,4o6 consent forms for steriliza- tion procedures.

      Why only examine 113 out of 3406? And what were the consequences that these doctors faced when discovered to be using insufficient information?

    5. Judge Gesell's ruling in Relfet al. v. Weinberger et al. required the HEW to cor- rect deficiencies in the guidelines, including the need for a definition of the term "voluntary," the lack of safeguards to ensure that sterilizations were vol- untary, and the absence of prohibitions against the use of coercion in obtain- ing consents.

      It's crazy to think that it was such a complicated thing to inform women and families of the risks involved and the irreversible-ness of the procedure. It seems like they are just looking for loopholes.

    6. In 1969 a federal court of appeals heard the case of]essin v. County of Shasta that alleviated the fears of many physicians who were wary of performing ster- ilization procedures and encouraged doctors to perform more ofthe operations during the 1970s

      Were they encouraging doctors to perform the sterilization procedures on native women specifically?

    7. Even though there have been increases in the number of medical personnel, statistics show that the number of doctors and nurses in relation to the number of Indians seeking service from the IHs has actually decreased since 1966.

      It's always good to see the truth of these statistics because without that knowledge politicians so conveniently leave out the important numbers that provide real context.

    8. arlier. Dr. Pinkerton-Uri had to tell the young woman that there was no such thing as a "womb transplant" despite the IHs physician hav- ing told her that the surgery was rev

      I cannot imagine the level of distrust that this woman must have after hearing that the procedure was irreversible. This level of deception is absolutely unforgivable and the doctor who performed the procedure should be locked away for a very long time.

    1. While much of the legislation is focused on the relationship between the federal government and tribal nations, it has brought about significant changes to tribal authority that have immense symbolic value and great potential for practical safety for Native women.

      I would like to think that every victory for the tribes just adds to their momentum in gaining sovereignty and over time the incremental victories lead to their deserved sovereignty.

    2. The removal of other crimes was necessary in order to achieve passage

      I'm no poli-sci buff but this seems to be a constant issue with passing legislation in the US. We often see bills get widdled down to nothing by the time they are passed.

    3. Some of the 2012–2013 rhetoric from the opposition dehumanized Native people but it also exposed anti-sovereignty sentiments and racist assumptions about Native people.For example, Senator Chuck Grassley (R–Iowa) proclaimed in his opposition to the bill that “on an Indian reservation, [a jury is] going to be made up of Indians, right? So the non-Indian doesn’t get a fair trial.”

      How ironic that native people know better than anyone what it is like to be subject to the unfair scrutiny of foreigners.

    4. The original act, passed in 1968, capped tribal sentences at six months’ incarceration and/or a $500 fine. Amendments in 1986 allowed for up to one year’s incarceration and/or a $5,000 fine. Under TLOA, the cap has been lifted slightly

      So basically they can only prosecute the lesser criminal acts while having to defer to the feds for anything serious?

    5. The incremental changes may seem frustrating, but also offer hope that Native voices have been heard.

      Incremental changes are good but are they sometimes also a way of "stringing them along?" It isn't hard to imagine congress giving them small wins just to keep them happy but with no real intention of ever making the more profound changes to legislation that the tribes would like to see.

    6. Another fundamental challenge with federal reform is the risk of increasing federal presence and punishment on tribal lands.

      The idea that the federal government was passing legislation that could then strip the tribal communities of their sovereignty without the knowledge or consent of the tribe is such a tough concept to wrestle with. It's as if they are punishing them before they give them the chance to prove that they are capable on their own.

    7. The law thus abruptly started the clock before most tribal leaders knew it existed.

      This doesn't really come as a surprise. I wonder what the consequences were if these tribal leaders weren't able to become fully compliant in a timely manner?

    1. Any honest anti-rape movement must wrestle with the dark truths of colonial violence, because the movement will remain stagnant unless we can centralize the context in which Native women expe-rience rape

      We cannot confront the issue in a half-assed way. We need to be honest about the heinous actions perpetrated since the time of colonial settlers to make an honest attempt at resolving the issue of rape and sexual assault committed against Native women.

    2. Recent reports of “man camps” at fracking sites make this issue even more salient today, as these camps repeat earlier histories of the rape of Native women during the Gold Rush and other moments in Amer-ican economic booms.

      This is so disturbing to think about. Not only is it terrible that this is happening now, but it has happened before back during the Gold Rush and is now being repeated by these men who are "fracking" near tribal communities?

    3. The 2013 reauthorization restored tribal criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians, a population that has been exempt from tribal criminal authority since 1978.

      Talk about a loophole for those who want to commit crimes on Indian territory.

    4. “Women’s sov-ereignty is central to Indian sovereignty because nations cannot be free if their Indian women are not free.”

      We talked about this exact point in class and I could not agree more. You need protection and freedom at the individual human level to maintain protection and freedom for the group as a whole.

    5. Meanwhile, her perpetrator freely roamed the village, terrorizing and traumatizing the whole community.

      This is insanity. I realize in this case they had no way to get there other than by air but still... I don't think anyone who lives in a modern day city or town can imagine having a killer on the loose with no law enforcement looking for them for three days!

    6. “Today I laughed for the first time since it hap-pened.”

      I literally cannot fathom how terrible of a traumatic experience I would have to go through to spend months, even years, without laughing or feeling real joy.

    7. Using the word epidemicdeflects responsibility because it fails to acknowledge the agency of perpetrators and those who allow the problem to continue.

      This seems oddly similar to the opiate "epidemic" that the US is currently facing. At least in the case of opiates there actually is a relatively recent uptick in death and addiction rates, whereas with Native women and sexual assault this is a longstanding problem that really shouldn't be characterized as an epidemic.

    1. Her story shows how hub-making can begin immediately, as Native American newcomers begin to transform strange urban spaces into home places while connecting with other Native Ameri-cans.

      I totally misunderstood what Roberts' goals were at the beginning of this article. Her hub-making system was exactly what relocated Natives needed and her story and strength throughout is incredibly impressive.

    2. In Mexico, for example, Indigenous peoples are no longer considered Native when they do not wear their traditional dress, speak their native language, or live in their ancestral homelands.

      This is the equivalent of telling someone they have lost their identity because they now wear a watch instead of carrying around a timepiece.

    3. It is also significant that Roberts did not create a disjuncture between her home on the reservation and her move to the city. She did not portray her trip as a final separation from home, but as a trip to explore new territory. Like the Warwick song, Roberts's story imagines San Jose as her own, a home away from home, finding friends along the way.

      I think making yourself the hero of your own story would be the only way to feel dignified in moving and to cope with the emotional stress and trauma of what was actually going on.

    4. conceptual process of emptying the landscape of any significant Indian presence with a last painful step, the government was then physically re-locating Indian people to the city.

      I'm sure they also made it seem like they were doing the Natives a favor by relocating them.

    5. And at that time, because you respect your elders and respect what they are saying, I was really, really angry, but I didn't want to show disrespect so I didn't say any-thing.

      This is so crazy to think about. I can't imagine feeling like I had to leave one of my parents (who is in bad health) simply to appease an elder who doesn't seem to have much empathy for my situation.

    6. She said she wanted to help Indians maintain their sense of Indian identity as well as encourage communication and understanding between various organizations within the San Jose Indian community, especially between the Muwekma ahlone Tribe, who are aboriginal to the area, and relocated Indians.

      Ok, good to hear that she wanted them to keep their identity. I misinterpreted "self-transformation." I hope.

    7. Transcommunality entails the development of alliances based on mutual respect from individuals who come from different ancestral locations. Mu-tual responsiveness and self-transformation, according to Childs, are key components to creating a community across difference where people learn and interact with each other.

      Of course the idea of respecting one another in an attempt to for communal bonds is a noble one, but why the emphasis on "self-transformation" ? Can they not keep their identities and still respect one another?

    8. Beside the employment aspect, the program also tried to assimilate Native Americans

      Not only did they consider these Natives participants but they also tried to help assimilate them? After they had just gotten back from fighting a war for the US?? Crazy.

    Annotators

    1. Her father was the chief of the band, as was his father before him.

      ...and another. There is clearly much concern for her male counterparts. It seems as though this was thought to be a necessary qualifying statement (presumably to lend credibility).

    2. An effort is being made to procure a church for her to speak in sometime this week, when she will present her case more fully, and it is hoped she will receive the attentions she justly deserves.

      Seems to be a favorable tone for Winnemucca here.

    Annotators

    1. Winnemucca did have a great dealof influence on Senator Dawes while he was writing the Dawes Act, whichpassed only seven months before Winnemucca died at the age of forty-three

      Sad that she died so young but amazing that she was able to have a direct influence on passing the Dawes Act before her passing.

    2. Winnemucca clearly and immediately constructs white men as frighten-ing (her fear of white men is repeated throughout Life) and white women as“angels” who bring gifts, a characterization that would have appealed to thenineteenth-century women reformists to whom Winnemucca often spoke.

      I wonder if she only used this tactic to entice the female reformists she spoke to, or if there actually was compassion for white women and contempt for white men. Couldn't blame her for feeling that way, either.

    3. Ihave lived a long time with white people, and I know what they do. They arepeople who are very kind to any one who is ready to do whatever they wish”

      She was clearly very intuitive and understood the underlying motivations that many men brought with them to any conversation or negotiation.

    Annotators

    1. In this regard, the shared beliefs and strategies for obtaining status is well-documented for Plains Indian men. Comparatively little information, however, is available on how women pursued alternative roles, how they achieved self-actualization in a male-oriented social system, and how they managed conflicts between personal strivings and societal norms.

      This is yet another instance where had there been more concern for the woman's experience we would have as full an understanding of that experience as we do of similar ones for men.

    2. And finally, women were also motivated by revenge and engaged in warfare to avenge a relative's death. Importantly, reasons for female engagement in warfare--defense, glory, and revenge--were not different from those that inspired men to fight

      Really interesting point. It obviously makes total sense but I am still shocked to read here that revenge was a main motivating factor to engage in war.

    3. Besides the evidence of female role variability provided by the categorical statuses just mentioned, there is also the well-known diversity of behavior associated with a woman's birth order. Among the Dakota, for instance, birth order positions had a powerful impact upon how children were raised and what behaviors were expected of them. Such differential treatment must have had a major influence on later adult behavior. There was also variation in treatment and expected roles of wives from the first to the last married, and there were differences in how women behaved in their various kinship statuses (i.e., older sister, younger sister, daughter, mother). Un-fortunately, the varied social positions of women in Plains Indian societies have not been well-documented, and as a consequence, it is difficult, if not impossible, to make conclusive statements ahout the dynamics of psychological and behavioral variations among women that correspond with recognized role diversity

      In some ways their system of assigning women roles seems far more progressive and creative than how we look at women (and men)'s social designations today but in other ways far more limiting and conservative than that of our own. For instance, some women can have multiple sexual partners without a negative stigma attached, but in other instances they are clearly still regarded as far inferior to their husbands.

    4. Ma tsaps designates a "crazy woman" but with spe-cial reference to sexual promiscuity. Among the Lakota, a correlate female figure is "Witkowin." Sexual promiscuity exhibited by a wi tkowi n was sanc-tioned through certain types of dreams.

      This is a fascinating social designation. It's such a far departure from our understanding of human behavior and social hierarchy.

    5. women appear to have been trained for this role as children, and like the manly-hearted women, they received the kinds of spe-cial privileges accorded to a favorite child.

      Sounds like a monarchy.

    6. As children, manly-hearted women were often favored with more food, toys, care and attention than other siblings. Such favoritism, which incidentally, was widely distributed among northern Plains groups, must have had a profound impact on a child's sense of self-assurance and independence.

      What initially gave a girl the distinction of a manly hearted woman? Was the mere favoritism as a child all that was needed to instill this confidence?

    7. Instead of looking at sex role reversals as a form of "deviance" derived from "incompetence" in the roles associated with a person's gender, it might be more productive to examine them as normative statuses which permitted individuals to strive for self-actualization, excellence, and social recognition in areas outside their customary sex role assignments. In this light, changing sex role identity becomes an achieved act which individuals pursue as a means for the healthy expression of alternative behaviors.

      This is really interesting and amazing that these communities were so open to members crossing the boundaries of typical gender roles. The fluidity with which they can do this speaks to how accepting they were of this practice. The fact that they were not ostracized for doing so, rather they were permitted to participate in both gender roles is insanely progressive in comparison to modern day American society.

    8. culturally accepted

      In this context it seems like culturally accepted means that both the men and women did not "bat an eye," so to speak, at the idea of women also being warriors.

    1. The stereotypic images from which the larger society draws its picture of Indian women clearly reflect the double-barreled character of their oppression

      Sadly, this seems to be the plight of all non-white American women.

    2. entity cannot be explained in terms of some con-sistent and reductionist set of criteria.

      Funny because we would never even think to reduce men to a universally applicable archetype that spans time and cultures. We always permit versatility for men.

    3. icates that their role patterns were highly variable, and that some of their ins ti tu tional ized role behaviors, notably that of the warrior, stood in marked contrast to the sup-posedly passive qualities of feminine personality in the native Plains

      I'm glad that we do have enough information to go off of to change the predominant narrative of native women. Luckily there are also scholars who are willing to put in the time to get accurate descriptions of the native woman's experience.

    4. it has been necessary for scholars in women's studies to develop their own conceptual frameworks.

      I fell like because there was a lesser concern for documenting native womens' roles and experiences we have left many gaps in our understanding of them that may never be filled. Whereas we detailed some of the most minute and trivial aspects of the mans role, we left so much out in regard to women. Because of this we have a plethora of info on men to glean a well informed idea of their life and their contributions but we are left in a deficit when trying to do the same for women.

    5. The extensive attention, if not preoccupation, with criticism in these writings not only involves dissecting the character of prevailing ideologies. It is equally concerned with discovering the philosophical and social roots of these ideolo-gies.

      This goes back to my question about why it is that native womens' history has been so overlooked. It makes sense to look at this issue from a philosophical perspective to better understand the root of the problem.

    6. Despite the recent surge of publications on women in different cultures, writings on American Indian women have lagged behind.

      I wonder why the native woman's experience has been so overlooked in comparison to those of women in other cultures? Nonetheless, the continued exploration into their experiences is a welcomed turning of the tides.

    7. In the writings of historians, native women rarely appear in descriptions of diploma tic and trade negotiations between Whites and Indians, nor are they usually present in discussions of military encounters

      This is such a common theme throughout the literature but we have seen time and time again just how much of a role women played in brokering deals and relationships between settlers and the native people.

    8. Inside the tipi, women sit in the background making moccasins or cooking a meal while the debates of an all male coun-cil dominate the picture.

      Even in instances where the roles of women are accurately depicted, the importance of these roles are often neglected and overlooked.

    9. The very fact that women are largely omitted in discussions of Plains Indian imagery testifies to their secondary place in popular myth and stereotypes.

      As per usual in American film, media, etc.

    Annotators

  3. Oct 2019
    1. These permits were also tied to specific grazing areas. As a result, families became tied to grazing land, although many continued to move seasonally with their herds.6

      Seems like their way of forcing them into a land ownership system, one that they were not accustomed to.

    2. These stories are also reminders that our behavior must be exemplary, for we are models for later generations.

      Not only do they need to retell their stories but if an ancestor had an admirable quality they were at least somewhat expected possess that same quality.

    3. Women’s authority extended into the political realm of Navajo society. This glimpse of the rela-tionship between Manuelito and Juanita reflects the ideal egalitarian nature of male-female relationships.

      These people would be considered progressive even in 2019.

    4. Navajo women retained cultural values by imbuing traditional foods with their former significance.

      Very interesting how impactful cuisine can be in telling a communities' story and continuing its traditions.

    5. A closer look at Grandfather Allison’s story illuminates the nature of Diné social organization, suggesting that women played central roles not only in the creation of identity but also in the establish-ment of kinship ties across tribal cultures. Traditionally, Navajos have established kin relationships before any communication could be initiated.

      Another reference to the significant contribution women made in forging relationships among different communities. They were the ones who first bridged those cultural gaps between groups.

    6. The fact that indigenous identity is presently a topic of discussion reflects contemporary preoccupations with biological identity and blood notions of authenticity. Studies that discuss these issues also demonstrate that identities are cultural constructions that differ across time, culture, and race.2

      This is such an interesting point to consider as we currently live in a political climate that places the utmost importance on your racial and geographical background.

    7. In them, Asdzáá Tł'ógi and her two daughters play a significant role in the survival and continuity of their families and clan members.

      The woman's role in guaranteeing the survival of the family and the clan is celebrated. I'm not sure we would have seen that same narrative from the settlers when telling their stories of survival and perseverance.

    8. We also note that the goal of life is continually to seek a state of hózhó, harmony and balance.

      These are common aspirations amongst all cultures and religions.

    9. Several of the narratives feature relationships between the sexes, which schol-ars have labeled “complementary,” meaning that gender roles are dif-ferent but equal and necessary.8 The natural world reflects the duality of male and female. We have female and male rains, for example. The earth is mother and the sun is father. Both female and male are cru-cial to the creation of all life. The story of the separation of the men and women details what happens if we do not work together.9 Tasks performed by males and females are equally crucial to the survival of the clan and community.

      I would say that their ideas of gender roles inherently have a sense of equality not seen in the views of the settlers.

    10. Because of such historical experiences under federal Indian policy, which sought to exterminate the Navajos culturally, the oral tradition was profoundly disrupted.

      I wonder if the settlers were aware of the importance of oral tradition in the native culture. I feel as though it is possible that by sending these kids to boarding schools they unintentionally dismantled the oral traditions which then led to their intended goal of diminishing the native culture.

    11. s my mother tells me, when my grandmother was a young woman, she was a skilled horsewoman, which was true of most Navajo women in her generation.

      This is just a cool random fact.

    12. In doing so, he followed the dic-tates of his extended family’s belief that an American education could be used to better Navajo conditions.

      Again we are seeing assimilation as a form of forging relationships between the natives and the whites.

    13. Writing down the remaining stories of our grandparents thus is a way to reaffirm clan ties and the value of Navajo cultural teachings.

      Without being ties to the same lands and hunting clans it seems writing is more modern way to connect with their people.

    14. Furthermore, our research aims to rewrite our histories in ways that more accurately reflect our experiences, especially under colonialism.

      This is very similar to some of the other texts we have read where one of the main purposes of them writing these papers is to take control of their history and rewrite the whitewashed history books, so to speak.

    1. Despite the physical and emotional hardship, or maybe even because of it, we were taking a hold of our past and controlling our history in a powerful, public effort. We were beginning a process of recla- mation, steeped for seven generations in the memory and strength of our ancestors.

      I like that she used the words "controlling our history." I think it is assumed that history is factual, yet we know that much of what we read about in our history books regarding the native experience during the time of white settlers in America is simply not accurate and is skewed in favor of the whites. The idea of controlling that narrative is powerful and it seems as though they took a huge step in that direction with this march.

    2. d. We, as women and children, were made further vul- nerable as we marched the final two miles to the fort, feeling waves, if only for brief moments, of the same loneliness and defenselessness that our grandmothers had felt befo

      Wow, she does a really good job of relating the intensity of this experience. I can't imagine what that must have felt like.

    3. He had specifically wanted to know how this event would help heal Dakota-white relations and was obviously unsatisfied with my re- sponse that this march was not about healing those wounds but about trying to heal our wounds, which have never been closed. His response was typical of those in power when injustices are perpetrated, for it is they who benefit from perpetuating the myth that peace can occur with- out justice, or healing without acknowledgment and reparations.

      This priest must not be familiar with the old saying that if you don't know your history you are bound to repeat it. Sad that some people can be so foolish to want to just brush anything that makes them uncomfortable under the rug.

    4. We had been wondering who was going to serve as our spiritual leader when Clifford had to leave later that night, and the an- swer came with Alameda. She is a pipe carrier from Fort Peck, and her spiritual leadership would carry us through the last difficult stretch to Fort Snelling

      Interesting that they rely on someone to be the spiritual leader at all times.

    5. In Henderson there seemed to be a genuine yearning among at least some of the population to come to terms with the terrible history of that place stemming from the brutality perpetrated upon its Indigenous in- habitants. A large group of young people from the charter school walked the first half of the next day with us as we made our way to Jordan. We appreciated their youthful energy and commitment to supporting

      Again, good to see that some of the townspeople were empathizing and even recognizing the severity of the tragic past.

    6. Just as we were turning from the major and busy Highway 169, a very understanding state trooper ar- rived with assisting police vehicles to escort our caravan across the high- way. As someone who had studied this period of Minnesota history, he understood that we needed to make the walk into town and volunteered to lead the walkers with his police car as long as the other cars drove on into the town and waited for us there.

      Nice to hear that someone empathized with them and had even taken the time to study their history. I wonder what his ethnic and cultural background was?

    7. But standing there with so many other Dakota people who shared our memories, our pain, and our love for our nation was probably the best way to restore a sense of warmth and well-being to each of us

      As history has shown us time and time again, tragic events often bring people together and sometimes make us feel even closer to each other.

    8. eoples. Picked up by the local newspaper, this led to a series of editorials being published, which demonstrated the strong sense of denial still prevalent in the area and rarely challeng

      It's sad that even with a group of people marching 150 miles and equipped with stories of the atrocities committed, that people still refused to step out of the shadows of their denial.

    9. In that evening meeting with the townspeople we shared stories about why we were participating in this event, realizing immediately the difficulty of engaging in a dialogue with even the most well-intentioned white townspeople

      These people probably have such a less significant connection to their past, as do I. It's hard to completely appreciate the significance of what their doing.

    10. . That was one of the lucid moments on the journey when I felt the significance of our undertaking personally and powerfully. That was the second day of the mar

      This kind of connection to our past is one that I am not familiar with. It would be cool to know this much about my ancestors. I have a feeling that when someones ancestors go through extreme hardship their stories are more frequently told so as to honor them and learn from their unfortunate circumstances.

    11. Mile by mile we were physically reclaiming our memory, our history, and our land. We were also leaving a visible sym- bol of this reclamation

      She clearly feels a very deep emotional connection to those that came before her and an obligation to honor their memory.

    12. r, "As tribal prisoners we carry the same spirit of many of our ancestors who were imprisoned in all of the earliest prisons. We know what it's like to survive the oppression and the ine

      This may have answered my question.

    13. In a few more days, I and about 800 other Lakota, Dakota and Nakota brothers from prison, will begin praying for the Dakota Commemorative Ma

      Are these men legitimate criminals or were they locked up because of a prejudiced system?

    Annotators

    1. Our role as historians should be to examine as many perspectives of the past as possible-not to become the validators or verifiers of stories, but instead to put forth as many perspectives as possibl

      There should definitely be an emphasis on the variety of perspectives because "facts" are sometimes influenced by the perspective of the one recording the events. The facts written down by white settlers surely contrasted those orally passed down by the Dakota's and other natives. Perspective is key.

    2. n the same way, these stories served to validate my identity in a positive way when, as a girl, I was confronted with contrasting negative images of the "Sioux" in school texts. These stories have stabilized me through graduate school and reminded me why I am involved in this sometimes painful process.

      Crazy to think about a young person having to deal with contradictory and sugar coated accounts of these times as seen in today's "history" books.

    3. rstood that our most important role as women is making sure our young ones are taken care of so that our future as Dakota people is assured. I learn

      Self preservation as well as the preservation of their stories.

    4. t it. When we were small Grandma used to talk about it. She used to

      Incredibly sad but we again see the importance they place on telling these stories. Also, the idea of a grandma telling her young grandchildren such a horrendous story and crying in front of them seems a little odd to me, admittedly, because my grandparents wouldn't have been so open and vulnerable with me at a young age. But I recognize this is just a cultural difference and the Dakota's tradition of storytelling had different limitations than does my culture.

    5. Especially in the last years of her life, on every visit she would tell stories about the Conflict of 1862, as if to reassure herself that she had fulfilled her obligations and that these stories would not be forgotten

      Woven into their societal norms is the obligation to pass down these stories. It sounds as if failure to do so would bring shame upon them.

    6. race. Almost every evening a myth, or a true story of some deed done in the past, was narrated by one of the parents or grandparents, while the boy listened with parted lips and glistening

      Every night suggests a very strong commitment to and importance placed upon transmitting their oral history.

    7. Grandma grew up in a rich oral tradition. Not only was she well- acquainted with many of the myths and legends of our people, she also possessed an amazing comprehension of our history, and many of her stories revolved around the events of the United States-Dakota Conflict of 1862. H

      I feel like nowadays many of the stories we pass down to successive generations focus a little more on the myths and legends (playful stories) rather than the factual historical stories that the Dakota people passed on. We tend to get these from books rather than orally.

    8. l to my life. It is through the stories of my grandmother, my grandmother's grandmother, and my grandmother's grandmother's grandmother and their lives that I learned what it means to be a Dakota woman, and the responsibility, pain, and pride associated with such a role. These stories in our oral tradition, then, must be appreciated by historians not simply for the illumination they bring to the broader historical picture but also as an essential component in the su

      She notes the importance of women passing down life lessons to the women that come after them. I wonder if the same goes for men.