See education, incl community college systems, curriculum designs/ assessment choices.

I see this implicit Skinnerism too much in institution reports: "Students do X (attend Writing Center, for example) and respond Y. Therefore, X causes Y" with little context.

The Death of the Author, by Roland Barthes

See, especially, the classroom, where conservative (often but not always White) faculty are hostile to marginalized groups, who purposefully instill barriers in the classroom: the syllabus, the "rules," the tricks of assessment, the tech gap, and more.

Complicate this with community colleges, whose boards are not necessarily wealthy, but certainly conservative because of their tax base and their reliance on the community's support; the conservative community are more visible, more verbal, than others.

Partly because of the psychology and internal insecurity of teachers/ faculty because of their threats by the state. But also because of their self-identity of "proficiency" vs. risky behavior.

Or, if not the society, the remnants of whiteness because of archaic but still powerful institutions. For example, the K-12 + community colleges might be much more multicultural than 20 years ago, the institutions' inertia (or lethargy) remains conservative. Academics, especially, rely on 20-year old traditions and pedagogies and hesitate to change.

Innately, U.S. publics mistrust science because the industries "push" their marketing strategies. It is difficult to trust health sciences when major pharmaceutical industry marketing uses the very same marketing as does McDonalds -- happiness comes with beautiful smiling faces, not the data.

Including academics/ universities/ colleges. Not only the peer review journals, but in the classrooms, the department meetings.

Increased student surveillance by faculty/institutions

In the shift/pivot, how many faculty are -- through ignorance or by choice -- preferring not seeing their students. One faculty says "[LMS] is easier because I don't have to deal with students."

No doubt, but we need to not confuse compassion with patronizing/ empathy, which similarly mimic real human learning

Start with placement, especially standardized testing to place into FYC. Then address assessments across the curriculum -- how do other discipline profs address "correctness" in any writing assignment?

This is the core. Anti-Black discrimination is an "easy" assumptions about inequalities in society, ignoring all other racist/sexist/classist oppressions. Especially in the academy, faculty easily attack language because the fallacy has so enmeshed in coded instruction. Faculty cannot say, "I don't like your body," but they can criticize behavior, including linguistic behavior.

This needs to be reexamined within the technology gap -- how marginalized communities innately come to the course with some powers and without other powers. Collaborative technologies may re-balance the communities' attitudes towards the academy, especially the academy's still antipathy against those marginalized.

Working class studies

​BUT, our students will not (most) have the economic, cultural, historical provenances nor intention ... the reality of community college students is that most will not produce academic discourse but will eak through multiple courses with minimum academic writing (and if so, poorly) while they will continue their certain continued marginalized communities that are, per Bourdieu, decapitalized (lacking cultural capital)​, whereas critical rhetoric could address these systemics inegalitarianism.