13 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2020
    1. All of this is on account we want to register, to become first-class citizens, and if the freedom Democratic Party is not seated now, I question America, is this America, the land of the free and the home of the brave where we have to sleep with our telephones off of the hooks because our lives be threatened daily because we want to live as decent human beings, in America?

      This to me sounds a lot like the present predicament of blacks and minorities in America today especially in the hands of the police. While we may have been granted the freedom to vote in elections, there's still so much systemic change and reforms that need to be made such as prison reforms, police reforms, civil rights improvement, legal justice, and equality for blacks and other minorities. Just like Fannie Lou Hamer said in her testimony, is this America? the land of the free and the home of the brave? a land of opportunities, dreams and achievements? I sincerely believe that despite our differences, we can all come together as a human race to combat racial injustice, nepotism, bigotry and hate for us to progress as one nation.

    2. On the 10th of September, 1962, sixteen bullets was fired into the home of Mr. and Mrs. Robert Tucker for me. That same night two girls were shot in Ruleville, Mississippi. Also Mr. Joe McDonald’s house was shot in.

      This just speaks of the brazen intimidation perpetuated by those in offices of power in order to frustrate and scare those fighting for racial equality and civil rights. From the testimony of Fannie Lou Hamer, it was obvious that these people were subjected to subhuman mistreatments just to instill fear in them to quit fighting, but for people like Ms Hamer, nothing was going to stop her quest for equality, not even the murders of Medger Evers and the disappearance of some black voters. She believed in posterity and so was steadfast in the fight.

    3. Civil rights activist Fannie Lou Hamer co-founded the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP) and traveled to the Democratic National Convention in 1964 to demand that the MFDP’s delegates, rather than the all-white Mississippi Democratic Party delegates, be seated in the convention. Although unsuccessful, her moving testimony was broadcast on national television and drew further attention to the plight of African Americans in the South.

      According to historical accounts, Mrs. Fannie Lou Hamer was a civil rights activist who widely campaigned against Mississippi's racial regime by highlighting the plights of the black community in the widely segregated southern part of America. As the co-founder of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP), she pushed for the inclusion of the black delegates especially from her party in the national convention of 1964. Even though that was not successful, her testimony which was broadcast on national television exposed the repressive violence the blacks suffered in the hands of the white leaders. So although this event took place several years ago, I personally do not think that a lot has changed systematically in the sense that there are some obstacles set by the system to keep minorities from filling up public offices. These may be in the form of financial or social standing.

  2. Sep 2020
    1. It is impossible for the United States to preserve itself as a republic or as a democracy when 600 families own more of this Nation’s wealth—in fact, twice as much—as all the balance of the people put together. Ninety-six percent of our people live below the poverty line, while 4 percent own 87 percent of the wealth. America can have enough for all to live in comfort and still permit millionaires to own more than they can ever spend and to have more than they can ever use; but America cannot allow the multimillionaires and the billionaires, a mere handful of them, to own everything unless we are willing to inflict starvation upon 125,000,000 people.

      In this "Share our Wealth" campaign, Huey Long asserts that it is inhumane for an individual or a few people acquire the wealth of a nation much like what we know today as the rich getting richer, while the poor are getting poorer. Long makes a case for the less fortunate by appealing for financial equality which he hopes to achieve through the redistribution, circulation, and control of wealth.

    2. Now, what did they mean by that? Did they mean, my friends, to say that all men are created equal and that that meant that any one man was born to inherit $10,000,000,000 and that another child was to be born to inherit nothing? Did that mean, my friends, that someone would come into this world without having had an opportunity, of course, to have hit one lick of work, should be born with more than it and all of its children and children’s children could ever dispose of, but that another one would have to be born into a life of starvation? That was not the meaning of the Declaration of Independence when it said that all men are created equal or “That we hold that all men are created equal.”

      Here, Mr. Long was making his point by pulling at the people's heartstrings. He tries to make his audience understand the injustice in systemic inequality by painting a picture of the haves and have-nots. The Declaration of Independence states matter of factly that "all men are created equal" in the same way that no one is above the law.

    3. We have everything here that we need, except that we have neglected the fundamentals upon which the American Government was principally predicated.

      In this paragraph, I believe that Mr. Huey Long was talking about the unalienable rights stipulated in the Declaration of Independence from Great Britain in 1776. These are; the right to life, right to freedom, and the pursuit of happiness which can be interpreted as 'chasing the American dream'.

    4. Now, we have organized a society, and we call it “Share Our Wealth Society,” a society with the motto “Every Man a King.”

      Huey Long, Francis Townsend, and Reverend Charles Coughlin were some of the many critics of President Roosevelt. Long through his famous speeches of 1934 titled "Every Man a King" and "Share Our Wealth", proposed an aggressive program for public spending and wealth redistribution across America to help the less fortunate during the great depression. As a proponent for economic equality, he advocated for wealth distribution on the premise that every American is entitled to the luxury and comfort afforded by the country as long as there's enough to reach everyone. Huey Long also believed in the fundamental rights under the Declaration of Independence which embodies the basic right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

    5. Now, my friends, if you were off on an island where there were 100 lunches, you could not let one man eat up the hundred lunches, or take the hundred lunches and not let anybody else eat any of them. If you did, there would not be anything else for the balance of the people to consume. … Now, we have organized a society, and we call it “Share Our Wealth Society,” a society with the motto “Every Man a King.”

      The great depression brought economic collapse in terms of unemployment, banking crisis, crashing stock markets, poverty, agricultural and environmental crisis in America. It started during the reign of President Herbert Hoover in 1929 and continued into 1932 during President Roosevelt's reign in power. During this time, voices of protest grew decrying the economic situation. One of such voices was from the renowned Huey Long, a flamboyant governor and senator from Louisiana who protested against President Roosevelt's handling of the great depression. President Roosevelt had implemented the initial relief programs dubbed the "New Deal" which was viewed as a conservative move by many critics since it did not focus specifically on the economic and social structures of the government.

    1. In answer to this, it has been claimed that the Negro can survive only through submission. Mr. Washington distinctly asks that black people give up, at least for the present, three things, — First, political power, Second, insistence on civil rights, Third, higher education of Negro youth,– and concentrate all of their energies on industrial education, the accumulation of wealth, and the conciliation of the South. This policy has been courageously and insistently advocated for over fifteen years, and has been triumphant for perhaps ten years. As a result of this tender of the palm-beach, what has been the return? In these years there have occurred: The disfranchisement of the Negro The legal creation of a distinct status of civil inferiority for the Negro. The steady withdrawal of aid from institutions for the higher training of the Negro. These movements are not, to be sure, direct results of Mr. Washington’s teachings; but his propaganda has, without a shadow of doubt, helped their speedier accomplishment. The question then comes: Is it possible, and probable, that nine millions of men can make effective progress in economic lines if they are deprived of political rights, made a servile caste, and allowed only the most meagre chance for developing their exceptional men? If history and reason give any distinct answer to these questions, it is an emphatic No. 

      Mr DuBois highlighted three major concerns in his speech. They were: political power, striving for civil rights, and acquisition of higher education for the Negro children. These issues were missing in Washington's speech which called for industrial growth, wealth accumulation, and conciliation with the south. DuBois condemned the perception of blacks as inferior to their white counterparts and partly blamed it on Mr Washington's speech. DuBois was of the opinion that educational, economic and political empowerment through civil rights legislation were inseparable. He therefore, challenged the status quo by advocating for the higher education, political power and social equality of the Negro youth.

    2. Easily the most striking thing in history of the American Negro since 1876 is the ascendancy of Mr. Booker T. Washington. … Mr. Washington represents in Negro thought the old attitude of adjustment and submission; but adjustment at such a peculiar time as to make his programme unique. This is an age of unusual economic development, and Mr. Washington’s programme naturally takes an economic cast, becoming a gospel of Work and Money to such an extent as apparently almost completely to overshadow the higher aims of life. Moreover, this is an age when the more advanced races are coming in closer contact with the less developed races, and the race-feeling is therefore intensified; and Mr. Washington’s programme practically accepts the alleged inferiority of the Negro races. Again, in our own land, the reaction from the sentiment of war time has given impetus to race-prejudice against Negroes, and Mr. Washington withdraws many of the high demands of Negroes as men and American citizens. In other periods of intensified prejudice all the Negro’s tendency to self-assertion has been called forth; at this period a policy of submission is advocated. In the history of nearly all other races and peoples the doctrine preached at such crises has been that manly self-respect is worth more than lands and houses, and that a people who voluntarily surrender such respect, or cease striving for it, are not worth civilizing.

      Mr. WEB DuBois, a leading black intellectual and co-founder of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) agitated against the systemic racial discrimination of blacks. In this paragraph, he openly criticizes Mr Washington's ideas claiming that his (Washington) speech advocated for the continuation of old attitudes of adjustments, slavery, and submission. Mr DuBois called for more adjustments in social justice to better the lives of the Negroes. In his speech titled "The Souls of the Black Folk", DuBois called for the abolition of submission and inferiority complex, and aimed to change the perception of black people as second-class citizens.

    3. The wisest among my race understand that the agitation of questions of social equality is the extremest folly, and that progress in the enjoyment of all the privileges that will come to us must be the result of severe and constant struggle rather than of artificial forcing. No race that has anything to contribute to the markets of the world is long in any degree ostracized [sic]. It is important and right that all privileges of the law be ours, but it is vastly more important that we be prepared for the exercises of these privileges. The opportunity to earn a dollar in a factory just now is worth infinitely more than the opportunity to spend a dollar in an opera-house.

      In this statement, Booker T. Washington either intentionally or inadvertently reinforces the general perception of black people as second-class citizens. He advises his people to forfeit the fight for equality and civil rights but focus on their educational and economic empowerment. Mr. Washington went on to open the Tuskegee institute located in Alabama where black people acquired industrial and vocational training necessary for their economic independence and self worth.

    4. To those of the white race who look to the incoming of those of foreign birth and strange tongue and habits of the prosperity of the South, were I permitted I would repeat what I say to my own race: “Cast down your bucket where you are.” Cast it down among the eight millions of Negroes whose habits you know, whose fidelity and love you have tested in days when to have proved treacherous meant the ruin of your firesides. Cast down your bucket among these people who have, without strikes and labour wars, tilled your fields, cleared your forests, builded [sic] your railroads and cities, and brought forth treasures from the bowels of the earth, and helped make possible this magnificent representation of the progress of the South. Casting down your bucket among my people, helping and encouraging them as you are doing on these grounds, and to education of head, hand, and heart, you will find that they will buy your surplus land, make blossom the waste places in your fields, and run your factories. While doing this, you can be sure in the future, as in the past, that you and your families will be surrounded by the most patient, faithful, law-abiding, and unresentful people that the world has seen. As we have proved our loyalty to you in the past, nursing your children, watching by the sick-bed of your mothers and fathers, and often following them with tear-dimmed eyes to their graves, so in the future, in our humble way, we shall stand by you with a devotion that no foreigner can approach, ready to lay down our lives, if need be, in defence of yours, interlacing our industrial, commercial, civil, and religious life with yours in a way that shall make the interests of both races one. In all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress.

      Mr Washington has been praised by some as a race leader, and also vilified as an accommodationist to America's unjust racial hierarchy. In this paragraph, he seems to be calling for the submission of Negroes to the white southerners, and at the same time, asking for cooperation, patience and tolerance from the white southerners. In his speech, he encouraged the southerners to cooperate with the black folks who were willing to work in the railroads and farms in order to achieve economic freedom. Some school of thought have argued that Mr. Washington's speech downplayed the issues of racial and social inequalities while promoting the inferiority of the black folks by overlooking the slavery concerns and calling for maximum cooperation to live in the segregated society and I agree with this line of thought. His conciliatory approach towards white supremacy overshadowed his efforts in assisting black Americans in the legal and economic quest for racial justice.

    5. A ship lost at sea for many days suddenly sighted a friendly vessel. From the mast of the unfortunate vessel was seen a signal, “Water, water; we die of thirst!” The answer from the friendly vessel at once came back, “Cast down your bucket where you are.” A second time the signal, “Water, water; send us water!” ran up from the distressed vessel, and was answered, “Cast down your bucket where you are.” And a third and fourth signal for water was answered, “Cast down your bucket where you are.” The captain of the distressed vessel, at last heading the injunction, cast down his bucket, and it came up full of fresh, sparkling water from the mouth of the Amazon River. To those of my race who depend on bettering their condition in a foreign land or who underestimate the importance of cultivating friendly relations with the Southern white man, who is their next-door neighbour, I would say: “Cast down your bucket where you are” — cast it down in making friends in every manly way of the people of all races by whom we are surrounded.

      This is an idiomatic expression in which Booker T. Washington admonishes his fellow black people who were formerly slaves to seek self empowerment through industrial education. Washington's 'Atlanta Compromise' speech delivered in 1895 during the progressive era centered on economic empowerment of black Americans, while at the same time serving the interests of the white supremacists. His speech emphasized economic empowerment above the quest for black freedom and detachment from slavery. This economic empowerment he argued could be attained by working in the fields of agriculture, mechanics, commerce, domestic services, and other professions.