Graph one period of f(x)=0.5csc(2x)
How the heck does this graph go with this equation?? Maybe graph 6.2.11?
Graph one period of f(x)=0.5csc(2x)
How the heck does this graph go with this equation?? Maybe graph 6.2.11?
. We can use two reference points, the local maximum at (π8,−3)
Where did this come from? We never discussed it as related to sinusoidal functions.
Graph one period of f(x)=−6sec(4x+2)−8
This is really unclear. The graph markings don't make anything obvious, which it's supposed to. y=-8 isn't indicated. This should really state where x is an asymptote in equation form. It was explained that x cannot = pi/(2B)k, but that has never been used in an example.
. There is a local minimum at (1.5,5)
you have yet to show any work-through for this. How many people wrote this section on Trigonometry??
Graph one period of y=4sec(π3x−π2)+1
Is this supposed to be pi*x/3 for Bx?
This is a vertical reflection of the preceding graph because A
This does not look like a vertical reflection of the preceding graph. The entire function is of a csc graph.
Find a formula for the function in Figure 6.2.7
How did you find A without any reference points that aren't equal to zero? If I double the period in x=pi, doesn't the amplitude also double? P=pi/A, A=pi/P, P=pi/2, A=pi/(pi/2)=2. (P/4,A) Ratios like this seem to be glanced over.
Plot reference points at (P4,A), (0,0), and (−P4,−A), and draw the graph through these points.
Where have you used (P/4,A)?
ecall that, for a point on a circle of radius r, the y-coordinate of the point i
This is new, it's not that I recall it. We haven't covered it.
. The phase shift is −2
So far, for all phase shifts, I could determine that the given phase shift moves either to the right or the left without knowing which it truly is.
um at x=1 and the maximum
Minimum and Maximum for sinusoidal equations is new and needs to be explained.
quarter points inc
Quater Points is something new. It needs explained.
possibilities
Why wouldn't I use cos(x), it would be easier to identify the phase shift and period. Who wrote this? This section is a bust. I have no idea how you decided C=pi/5, why you used sin(x). I said y=cos(x), B=pi/5, and the phase shift was about 3.5 or 7/2. This gives a phase shift of C/B=(7/2)/(pi/5). What method are you using??
function
for y=cos(x), C=1, so the phase shift is C/B=1/(pi/2)=3/pi.
shift
for y=cos(x), C=1, so the phase shift is C/B=1/(pi/2)=3/pi.
units
radians?
, which shifts to the right by π4
c<0 shifts left? or is it -(-C)?
If C<0, the graph shifts to the left.
for f(x)=sin(x-(pi/4)), C<0 and shifts right in the graph. This statement says it shifts left...! The last statement in this paragraph says that it shifts right! Are you saying that I'm looking at -(-C)?
xis, bec
There shouldn't be a comma here.
functions
sect
If cos(t)=1213 cos(t)=1213 and t t is in quadrant IV, as shown in Figure 5.3.8
12/13
Now let’s take a moment to reconsider the Ferris wheel introduced at the beginning of this section. Suppose a rider snaps a photograph while stopped twenty feet above ground level. The rider then rotates three-quarters of the way around the circle. What is the rider’s new elevation? To answer questions such as this one, we need to evaluate the sine or cosine functions at angles that are greater than 90 degrees or at a negative angle. Reference angles make it possible to evaluate trigonometric functions for angles outside the first quadrant. They can also be used to find (x,y)
wth? I guess we're not going to cover this original problem??
Looking for a thrill? Then consider a ride on the Singapore Flyer, the world’s tallest Ferris wheel. Located in Singapore, the Ferris wheel soars to a height of 541 feet—a little more than a tenth of a mile! Described as an observation wheel, riders enjoy spectacular views as they travel from the ground to the peak and down again in a repeating pattern. In this section, we will examine this type of revolving motion around a circle. To do so, we need to define the type of circle first, and then place that circle on a coordinate system. Then we can discuss circular motion in terms of the coordinate pairs.
I see part 2 where the photographer snaps a photo at 20 feet and makes a 3/4 rotation, but are we not going to solve this?
Next, we will find the cosine and sine of the reference angle: cos(π6)=32 sin(π6)=12
sqrt(3)
a
the
is the same length, and we know one side is the radius of the unit circle, all sides must be of length 1.
This would have been better worked out as an example
Divide the total rotation in radians by the elapsed time to find the angular speed: apply ω=θt
What happened to the theta^R notation?
A satellite is rotating around Earth at 0.25 radians per hour at an altitude of 242 km above Earth. If the radius of Earth is 6378 kilometers, find the linear speed of the satellite in kilometers per hour.
This problem doesn't make clear that the satellite is rotating around the central point of the Earth and that RADIUS of the satellite, here, means R_E+h_S. Not to mention, that the Earth is not perfectly spherical, or circular in our 2-D model that doesn't include the picture. This problem is such a leap from the previous question and information that it's a wonder anyone can get it.
Angular speed can be given in radians per second, rotations per minute, or degrees per hour for example.
The directions for solving these problems puts these measurements in radians/unit time.
Notice what happens if we find the ratio of the arc length divided by the radius of the circle. (5.1.10)Smaller circle: 12π2=14π(5.1.11)Larger circle: 34π3=14π
How did you determine these arc lengths? Wasn't it necessary to use the angle to find the arc length? This argument is circular.
As with exponential models, data modeled by logarithmic functions are either always increasing or always decreasing as time moves forward.
I wanted this as part of my notes for exponential models.
4.7: Exponential and Logarithmic Models
This section would be better set up if you put the exponential growth/decay first, then the half-life/doubling-time. This is confusing to take notes from as it is and there's a lot of back-and-forth. The relation between y=a(b^x) and y=A_0e^(kt) was not made clear early enough.
Rewrite y=abx as y=aeln(bx). Use the power rule of logarithms to rewrite y as y=aexln(b)=aeln(b)x. Note that a=A0 and k=ln(b) in the equation y=A0ekx.
This should have been written at the beginning of the section.
Does a linear, exponential, or logarithmic model best fit the data in Table 4.7.2
With no 0-value, I used the ratio of two points fitted into y=ae^(kx), found that 3.297/24.365=(ae^k)/(ae^(5k) yields k=.5, then used that information and the first point to determine a=2. Not much practice doing this prior to now.
This formula is derived as follows: T(t)=Abct+TsT(t)=Aeln(bct)+TsLaws of logarithmsT(t)=Aectlnb+TsLaws of logarithmsT(t)=Aekt+TsRename the constant c lnb, calling it k
What are b and c? How did you get from b^ct to e^(ln(b^ct))??
ht of 12 an
12 grams?
The formula is derived as follows 12A0=A0ekt12=ektDivide by A0ln(12)=ktvTake the natural log−ln(2)=ktApply laws of logarithms−ln(2)k=tDivide by k
what is ln(1/2)=ktv?
-ln(2)k=t? shouldn't this be -ln(2)/k=t?
he labeled points (1/k, (A_0)e), (0, A_0), and (-1/k, (A_0)/e). The second graph is of when k<0 and with the labeled points (-1/k, (A_0)e), (0, A_0), and (1/k, (A_0)/e)." src="/@api/deki/files/12238/fig_6.8.4.jpg">
Found the information for the graphs previously shown.
as we can see in Figure 4.7.2 and Figure 4.7.3.
Interested in why the points chosen were chosen, but not seeing anything about it.
We can see how widely the half-lives for these substances vary. Knowing the half-life of a substance allows us to calculate the amount remaining after a specified time. We can use the formula for radioactive decay: (4.6.4)A(t)=A0eln(0.5)Tt(4.6.5)A(t)=A0eln(0.5)tT(4.6.6)A(t)=A0(eln(0.5))tT(4.6.7)A(t)=A0(12)tT
Why are equation 4.6.4 and 4.6.5 the same?
takes for half of the u
'the unstable material' not before mentioned?
Solve
or x=-1
Equations
Where's all the properties of the identities? ln(e^x)=x, etc?
Key Equations
I think e^(log base e of x) = x should be here, along with ln(e^x)=x.
For example, to evaluate log(100), we can rewrite the logarithm as log10(102), and then apply the inverse property logb(bx)=x to get log10(102)=2. To evaluate eln(7), we can rewrite the logarithm as eloge7, and then apply the inverse property blogbx=x to get eloge7=7. Finally, we have the one-to-one property.
This is very understated and is an identity for logarithms.
Change
I really can't figure this one out. log base 10 of .58 is ln(.58)/ln(10)?
Condense
I haven't learned whatever property produces these results. Are these each log base b of 1?
Expand
expand log (sqrt x) maybe?
rough the points (–1,1)
Just what is this supposed to be proving? Somehow this misses the mark that k=1.
and has been vertically reflected. We do not know yet the vertical shift or the vertical stretch. We know so far that the equation will have form:
Annoying that we've been using d for the vertical shift, and it's showing up as k here.
4.4: Graphs of Logarithmic Functions
I think there should be more examples that would determine shifted points of interest formulas: (b,1)-->(b-c,1) (1/b,-1)-->((1/b)-c,-1) (1,0)-->(1-c,0) for horizontal shift, etc.
and key point (b,1)
You should mention key point (1/b,-1) here
notice
?
Label the three points.
What are they???
Consider the three key points from the parent function, (13,−1)
Neither of these were mentioned explicitly and need to be: log base b of b =1 log base b of 1/b =-1
Identify three key points from the parent function. Find new coordinates for the shifted functions by adding d
Neither of these were mentioned explicitly and need to be: log base b of b =1 log base b of 1/b =-1
Consider the three key points from the parent function, (13,−1)
where did key point (1/3,-1) come from?
4.3: Logarithmic Functions
These sections on logarithms need more analysis including a section on what the key points are and the logarithmic identites.
is equivalent to log2(12)=−1
Labeling this as a key point right now would be great.
wo other points
Why choose the point (1,-.25)?
Plot the y-intercept, (0,1),along with two other points. We can use (−1,4) and (1,0.25). Dra
This is a great time to introduce why the point (1,1/4) was chosen and labeling it a key point.
Plot the key point (b,1)
Neither of these were mentioned explicitly and need to be. log base b of b =1 log base b of 1/b =-1
days
the carrot is showing as a 6 in the exponential
square root is only defined when the quantity under the radical is non-negative,
Didn't we just cover that i=sqrt(-1)?
y(x)=12x2 We are interested in the surface area of the water, so we must determine the width at the top of the water as a function of the water depth. For any depth y, the width will be given by 2x, so we need to solve the equation above for x and find the inverse function. However, notice that the original function is not one-to-one, and indeed, given any output there are two inputs that produce the same output, one positive and one negative. To find an inverse, we can restrict our original function to a limited domain on which it is one-to-one. In this case, it makes sense to restrict ourselves to positive x values. On this domain, we can find an inverse by solving for the input variable:
What??? This really needs better explained.
is exhibiting a behavior similar to 1x2
Why is the behavior like 1/x^2 instead of -1/x^2??
The one at x=–1 seems to exhibit the basic behavior similar to 1x, with the graph heading toward positive infinity on one side and heading toward negative infinity on the other. The asymptote at x=2 is exhibiting a behavior similar to 1x2, with the graph heading toward negative infinity on both sides of the asymptote. See Figure 3.7.25.
This should have been made clearer much earlier: that each factor in the denominator has a 1/x or 1/x^2 behavior around the axis of symmetry, the vertical asymptote. Why did I have to piece this together?
Writing Rational Functions
Section 3.7 is very lengthy and dense.
o we know the behavior will be the same on both sides of the asymptote.
Not sure where the basis for this statement is. You need a small section about rational denominator asymptotic behavior.
or the vertical asymptote at x=2, the factor was not squared, so the graph will have opposite behavior on either side of the asymptote.
Another new one by me.
The factor associated with the vertical asymptote at x=−1 was squared, so we know the behavior will be the same on both sides of the asymptote. The graph heads toward positive infinity as the inputs approach the asymptote on the right, so the graph will head toward positive infinity on the left as well.
This is new.
When the degree of the factor in the denominator is even, the distinguishing characteristic is that the graph either heads toward positive infinity on both sides of the vertical asymptote or heads toward negative infinity on both sides. See Figure 3.7.19.
Would this be the degree of the factor for a_np(x)/b_nq(x)? Either way, that is not showing true for the example 3.7.10.
e degree of the factor in the denominator is odd, the distinguishing characteristic
This should have been mentioned at the beginning of rational functions descriptions.
Figure
Why doesn't the end behavior follow 1/x? The degree of p(x)<degree of q(x). Isn't the value between x=-2 and x=-3 supposed to be negative?
A horizontal asymptote of a graph is a horizontal line<br /> where the graph approaches the line as the inputs increase or decrease without bound.
This function will have a horizontal asymptote at y=0. See Figure 3.7.16.
Is y=0 really an asymptote if the function crosses it? Are we defining asymptotes only in the end behaviors? Also, shouldn't there be an x-intercept at x=-3? Shouldn't the end behavior go like 1/x? Why isn't the value between x=-2 and x=-3 negative?
Likewise, a rational function’s end behavior will mirror that of the ratio of the function that is the ratio of the leading terms.
Why doesn't this happen for the example f(x)=((x-2)(x+3))/((x-1)(x+2)(x-5))?
The vertical asymptotes of a rational function may be found by examining the factors of the denominator that are not common to the factors in the numerator. Vertical asymptotes occur at the zeros of such factors.
This should have been mentioned in the asymptotes section
To find the horizontal asymptote, divide the leading coefficient in the numerator by the leading coefficient in the denominator: (3.7.9)110=0.1
I think this should have been introduced much earlier, including why that should be the case.
As the inputs increase and decrease without bound, the graph appears to be leveling off at output values of 3, indicating a horizontal asymptote at y=3.
This would be the time to introduce that the ratio of the leading coefficients determines the horizontal asymptote.
351=13w3+43w2
Where does 351=13w^3+43w^2 come from?
We can conclude if k is a zero of f(x), then x−k is a factor of f(x).
This is written confusingly.
We can apply this theorem to a special case that is useful in graphing polynomial functions. If a point on the graph of a continuous function f at x=a lies above the x-axis and another point at x=b lies below thex-axis, there must exist a third point between x=a and x=b where the graph crosses the x-axis. Call this point (c,f(c)).This means that we are assured there is a solution c where f(c)=0.
This should be a separate paragraph topic.
Figure
2.2.25?
intercept
so the variable goes with the 1/2?
coordinates
f(3)=-2-->(3,-2)
Now that we can find the inverse of a function, we will explore the graphs of functions and their inverses. Let us return to the quadratic function f(x)=x2
Since the graph shows function f(x), the f(x) axis should be labeled as y.
Solution
Where does y=2/(x-3+4) come from?
Identify which of the toolkit functions besides the quadratic function are not one-to-one, and find a restricted domain on which each function is one-to-one, if any. The toolkit functions are reviewed in Table 1.7.2
This is confusing and incomplete
the identity function
Put that in bold print
Table 1.6.1
shouldn't the f(x) column be just x?
Find the domain of (f∘g)(x) where f(x)=1x−2 and g(x)=x+4
Shouldn't this be [-4,2) union (2,infinity)?
Suppose f(x) gives miles that can be driven in x hours and g(y) gives the gallons of gas used in driving y miles. Which of these expressions is meaningful: f(g(y)) or g(f(x))? Solution The function y=f(x) is a function whose output is the number of miles driven corresponding to the number of hours driven. number of miles =f(number of hours) The function g(y) is a function whose output is the number of gallons used corresponding to the number of miles driven. This means: number of gallons =g(number of miles) The expression g(y) takes miles as the input and a number of gallons as the output. The function f(x) requires a number of hours as the input. Trying to input a number of gallons does not make sense. The expression f(g(y)) is meaningless. The expression f(x) takes hours as input and a number of miles driven as the output. The function g(y) requires a number of miles as the input. Using f(x) (miles driven) as an input value for g(y), where gallons of gas depends on miles driven, does make sense. The expression g(f(x)) makes sense, and will yield the number of gallons of gas used, g, driving a certain number of miles, f(x), in x hours.
This is badly put together and difficult to understand.
Absolute value, decreasing 9-infinity,0)
a+7
a cannot equal 5
people, n, to the cost, C.
another comma catastrophe
The vertical extent of the graph is all range values 5 and below,
This should be written as "The vertical extent of the graph is all range values from -infinity to 5, including 5..." The explanation just explains that you wrote it wrong and didn't bother to correct it.
If the function’s formula contains an even root, set the radicand greater than or equal to 0, and then solve.
So, that's not a fraction like the Howto describes.
solve for x
I see we've decided to exclusively list the input variable as x.
interval that is more than 0 and less than or equal to 100 and write (0,100].
it is worth noting that if x were the dependent variable for the amount of money spent, domain would be 0<x<=100.
Domain and Range
After learning that domain and range are related to the x and f(x) values of input of the dependent variable and output of the independent variable, I'm surprised to see that there's an entire section about it.
for any input, r, there is only one output, A.
should be written: for any input 'r', there is only one output 'A'. Comma castatstrophe. Use commas to set off extra information.
inputs q and r both give output n.
The original problem doesn't name inputs as 'q' and 'r', nor output 'n'.
Figures 1.1.1a and 1.1.1b.
a link here where I could open these up in a different browser tab would be useful here. I hate to have to leave my place in this online book and have to figure out where I left off when I get back. Better yet, it's an online text, why not just put the information here too. The original problem doesn't name inputs as 'q' and 'r', nor output 'n'.
To solve f(x)=4, we find the output value 4 on the vertical axis. Moving horizontally along the line y=4, we locate two points of the curve with output value 4: (−1,4) and (3,4). These points represent the two solutions to f(x)=4: −1 or 3. This means f(−1)=4 and f(3)=4, or when the input is −1 or 3, the output is 4. See Figure 1.1.9.
A good exercise here would be to come up with the equation of the graphed function. (x-1)^2=f(x) f(-1)=4 (-1,4), f(3)=4 (3,4)
How To: Given a function represented by a table, identify specific output and input values 1. Find the given input in the row (or column) of input values. 2. Identify the corresponding output value paired with that input value. 3. Find the given output values in the row (or column) of output values, noting every time that output value appears. 4. Identify the input value(s) corresponding to the given output value.
This information should have been included in the beginning table examples.
There is an urban legend that a goldfish has a memory of 3 seconds, but this is just a myth. Goldfish can remember up to 3 months, while the beta fish has a memory of up to 5 months. And while a puppy’s memory span is no longer than 30 seconds, the adult dog can remember for 5 minutes. This is meager compared to a cat, whose memory span lasts for 16 hours.
This information is clearly wrong.
Species - Typical Short‑Term Memory - Long‑Term Memory
Puppy Hours to days Months to years
Adult Dog Hours to days Months to years
Cat Hours to days Months to years
Goldfish Minutes to hours Months to years
Betta Fish Minutes to hours Weeks to months
Puppy 0.008 Adult Dog 0.083 Cat 3 Goldfish 2160 Beta Fish
This information is clearly wrong.
Species - Typical Short‑Term Memory - <br /> Long‑Term Memory
Puppy Hours to days <br /> Months to years
Adult Dog Hours to days <br /> Months to years
Cat Hours to days <br /> Months to years
Goldfish Minutes to hours <br /> Months to years
Betta Fish Minutes to hours <br /> Weeks to months
We can rewrite it to decide if p is a function of n.
A better description of how one would determine whether something is a function based on two variables that appear to be dependent on each other would make sense here. It would seem that they are functions of each other when written this way. Reference to the following example is not a factor in this statement.
and h(4)=24
Why am I finding h(4) in the solution?
With an input value of a+h, we must use the distributive property.
We could include here that f(a) is contained within the output of f(a+h) and substitute it to show that it =f(a)+h^2+2ah+3h
b. In this case, the input value is a letter so we cannot simplify the answer any further. f(a)=a2+3a−4
we can apply algebra and find that for (a+4)(a-1), a=1, -4
Table 1.1.5 displays the age of children in years and their corresponding heights.
It is unclear whether height could be a function of the age.