Girls like Faith never gave up in believing she can find more opportunities in her life by seeking education, what she did is really brave and it's harsh knowing that she had to do what she did to just try to enroll into class.

The speaker expected a small amount of girls to come for enrollment but instead 10 times the amount she expected came which speaks volumes on how big of a situation FGM is and how many young girls want to get away from it and seek more better opportunities.

This statement is such a powerful line because by allowing girls the freedom to seek education in schooling, etc; your making it possible for both genders to become equals within a community since in some third world countries, girls don't have that chance to get an education.

This is such a harmful way of dictating what gets fed to the public and I can't believe some farmers could actually think this. It wasn't a matter of the food being edible but the matter of the food fitting the cosmetic standard!? For people in need, that food would have benefit them no matter the appearance so this way of thinking does not make any sense to me.

Instead of letting food go to waste, the author expressed his way of coping with the injustice of food waste by simply sitting down and eating the food. A simple action had a huge meaning behind on what he's trying to accomplish. Plus sitting down and eating breakfast with your pigs is such a wholesome thing to do.

A small sentence like this has a huge significance and probably was the biggest realization the author ever had. Food that would have been someone's actual meal for the day went towards being scrap food for pigs. A realization he made at such a young age.

Getting richer isn't a way to solve all the social problem one country can face. Money can't solve everything, some problems need to be approach through communication and heart rather than just a giant paycheck.

Most countries don't have the opportunities to at least have all the resources needed in the Social Progress Index. The third fundamental question is the scariest one to ponder about in my opinion, it's possible that your rights, freedom of choice, and opportunities to succeed can never be given to you which impacts the first two questions about food necessities and environment.

The idea of the SGDs trying to solve 17 goals is a giant task at hand; with some of them carry very vague end goals. "Promoting peaceful and tolerant societies" are much more complicated than simply "ending hunger". I believe that the specific tasks can greatly affect the other tasks in a good way, other countries providing resources to less fortunate countries in need could make relations between them good.

In this day in age where people like to say their opinion first without the intent of listening to others afterwords lead to strife that have other wise been avoided.

Others can take things the wrong way even when you don't mean them so being compassionate means to also see things from their point of view and respecting them.

The idea about being passionate towards others no matter how we look, who we are, and what we believe in is what makes us definitely human; but sadly some people in the world are that heartless and cruel.