19 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2021
    1. Fifty years ago a meeting such as this, planned, conduc- ted and addressed by women would have been an impossibil- ity. Less than forty years ago, few sane men would have pre- dicted that either a slave or one of his descendants would in this century at least, address such an atadience in the Nation’s Capital at the invitation of women representing the highest, broadest, best type of womanhood, that can be found any- where in the world.

      A reminder of the importance of optimism. Even when there is still much work to be done, looking back at how much has already been accomplished is vital in motivating people to continue the fight.

    Annotators

    1. Because the concept of marching in public in Washington required the suffragists to assert themselves as citizens, some organizers, including Paul, believed the presence of black women could weaken their claims to political le-gitimacy.

      This is so gross. Is it that hard to advocate for multiple forms of equality? How much do you really care about your cause if you're willing to turn away people who want to help based on the color of their skin?

    Annotators

    1. If the right of suffrage is one of the necessary privileges of a citizen of the United States, then the constitution and laws of Missouri confining it to men are in violation of the Constitution of the United States, as amended, and consequently void.

      It's sad that this needs to be said at all, let alone brought all the way to the Supreme Court, but it is definitely satisfying to see justice served.

    Annotators

    1. That no female (shall) be employed in any me-chanical establishment, 6r factory,, or laundry in this Statemore than ten hours 'during any one" day

      I'm feeling mixed about this. On one hand, I think it's a good thing that you can't be forced to work in a factory for more than ten hours a day. On the other hand, the fact that it only applies to women definitely feels kinda sexist. Why only women? Why isn't it that no one can be made to work in a factory for more than ten hours a day? It seems to suggest an idea that women are weaker and/or more vulnerable than men.

    Annotators

    1. The manufacturer who owns, say, from three or four to a dozen or more tenements contiguous to his shop, fills them up with these people, charging them outrageous rents, and demanding often even a preliminary deposit of five dollars "key money" ;2 deals them out tobacco by the week, and devotes the rest of his energies to the paring down of wages to within a peg or two of the point where the tenant rebels in desperation. When he does rebel, he is given the alternative of submission, or eviction with entire loss of employment.

      This is absolutely disgusting. The way employers and landlords are able to treat the people who are essentially completely at their mercy is utterly abhorrent and horrific.

    Annotators

    1. Under such circumstances the freedom of master and employe to contract with each other in relation to their employment, and in defining the same, cannot be prohibited or interfered with, without violating the Federal Constitution.

      This leaves me feeling somewhat uncomfortable. While I think it's reasonable that a worker's hours should be determined by the people involved, I think a complete lack of government intervention opens the door for some really unfair treatment of employees and unreasonable hours.

    2. ubject for vaccination, and yet, while remaining in the com-munity, refused to obey the statute and the regulation adopted in execution of its provisions for the protection of the public health and the public safety, confessedly endangered by the presence of a dangerous disease."

      What? You mean to tell me that vaccine mandates have existed since at least 1905? I thought the government just created it in order to control the public! Facebook told me so! (Just so we're all on the same page, the above is satire)

    Annotators

    1. We represent a new line of thought among Negroes. Whether you call it advanced thought or reactionary thought, I do not care. If it is reactionary for people to seek independence in government, then we are reactionary. If it is advanced thought for people to seek liberty and freedom, then we represent the advanced school of thought among the Negroes of this country.

      I really love how to-the-point and almost blunt Garvey is here. He is essentially saying "I don't care what you think about or way of thinking, this is what we represent and this is what we want."

    Annotators

    1. 1. The disfranchisement of the Negro.2. The legal creation of a distinct status of civil inferiority for the Negro.3. The steady withdrawal of aid from institutions for the higher training of the Negro.

      DuBois makes a strong argument. While Washington's actions are certainly commendable, they have not done enough to stop certain injustices from occurring - making it significantly more difficult to make more impactful change.

    1. Never before in the modern age has a great and civilized folk threatened to adopt so cowardly a creed in the treatment of its fellow-citizens born and bred on its soil. Stripped of verbiage and subterfuge and in its naked nastiness the new American creed says: Fear to let black men even try to rise lest they become the equals of the white. And this is the land that professes to follow Jesus Christ. The blasphemy of such a course is only matched by its cowardice.

      This is such a powerful argument. It really gets right to the core of American beliefs of the time, of patriotism, bravery, and Christianity. DuBois highlights the fact that treating black people differently from white people is a show of cowardice, of fear, which goes against everything they claim to stand for.

    Annotators

    1. There is no escape through law of man or God from the inevitable:The laws of changeless justice bind Oppressor with oppressed;And close as sin and suffering joined We march to fate abreast...

      I love Washington's point here. This idea that we all die eventually, and when we do, God judges us all the same (according to Christian beliefs). If God sees us all as equal, who are you to disagree?

    1. But we do insist that the punishment is not the same for both classes of criminals. In lynching, opportunity is not given the Negro to defend himself against the unsupported accusations of white men and women.

      While lynching has become less common in the US (though still very much a very real problem), it is frustrating to read this document from over a century ago and see that there were injustices faced then that are still extremely prevalent today. Black people have always been punished much more harshly than white people, and this shows that it is a problem that has existed for a very long time.

    1. “I don’t know what’s the matter with me,” she complained, ”I feel so dissatisfied with my life, so isolated from all my kind.”29 Wells enjoyed male company but resisted marriage and the ”inevitable baby” that fol- lowed.3

      It's truly saddening to see how this emphasis on marriage caused such harm to many women's mental health. The opposition to marriage lead Wells, and no doubt many other women to believe that there was something somehow wrong with them, when in reality, they just didn't want something like that. Unfortunately, this is a problem that many LGBTQA+ people still face today.

    Annotators

  2. Sep 2021
    1. After depriving her of all rights as a married woman, if single, and the owner of property, he has taxed her to support a government which rec-ognizes her only when her property can be made profitable to it.

      This connects to a point that Grimke made: that this is taxation without representation. The hypocrisy is written on the walls. This is made worse by the fact that if the husband dies and the wife does not, she only gets to keep a third of the property.

    Annotators

    1. The laws above cited are not very unlike the slave law of Louisiana.

      This is pretty much the core of Grimke's argument. She later states that what free women experience is as bad as what slaves experience, which is true, but she is absolutely right in her comparison that women are limited in many of the same ways that slaves are.

    Annotators

    1. One was a fair white child; the other was her slave, and also her sister. When I saw them embracing each other, and heard their joyous laughter, I turned sadly away from the lovely sight. I foresaw the inevitable blight that would fall on the little slave’s heart. I knew how soon her laughter would be changed to sighs.

      The sense of pain and sorrow here is tangible. Jacobs understands what will happen to the black girl before long, and her heart hurts because of it. It also highlights that racism is not an inherent belief, but is learned from society.

    1. The freedom gained is yours; and you, there fore, may properly celebrate this anniversary.

      Douglass' word choice is extremely important, and this sentence displays that perfectly. July 4th is the day that white people gained freedom. Slaves like himself were not free, and therefore, he feels like he cannot properly celebrate it. He does not, however, try to diminish the impact of the date, as this would likely cause more outrage than actual discussion. Douglass recognizes and affirms how significant and important this date is in American history, in world history while also drawing attention to the fact that, as someone who was once a slave, he and many others do not feel the same connection, as it did not do the same things for them.

    1. People of New-England, and of the free States! is it true that slavery is no concern of yours? Have you no right even to protest against it, or to seek its removal? Are you not the main pillars of its support?

      Garrison makes a great point here. Even though Northern States do not have slavery, they are not without blame. By taking advantage of the products of slavery and not actively advocating for its elimination, they allowed it to exist and to worsen.

    Annotators

    1. What right then, have we to obey and call any other Master, but Himself?

      Walker's ability to consistently point out the irony of white Christians advocating for slavery is extremely powerful. Even today, many people attempt to use the Bible to justify their hate, highlighting just how little they truly understand what Jesus preached.

    Annotators