are the more pointed and more interesting and, perhaps, the most instructive.
it is more interesting to look at classical examples of montage, where the dearth of art form necessitated a use of montage that is informative to us about a classical worldview.
there is no inconsistency between the method whereby the poet writes, the method whereby the actor forms his creation within hi1nself, the method whereby the same actor acts his role witbin the frame of a single shot, and that method whereby his actions and whole performance, as well as the actions surrounding him, forming his environment ( or the whole material of a film) are made to flash in the hands of the director through the agency of the montage exposition and construction of the entire film.
by directing the effect of an actor on a film through montage, the director of a film has an effect on the piece as a whole that is equivalent to the actors effect on themself through internal acting
we must approach its problems simply and afresh.
there is no inconsistency between the method whereby the poet writes, the method whereby the actor forms his creation within hi1nself, the method whereby the same actor acts his role witbin the frame of a single shot, and that method whereby his actions and whole performance, as well as the actions surrounding him, forming his environment ( or the whole material of a film) are made to flash in the hands of the director through the agency of the montage exposition and construction of the entire film.
Conclusion?