Thescience is poor, and the politics harmful: in either case, his life history perspective on theorigins and adaptive significance of racial differences contributes nothing to an under-standing of the biological or social meanings of race
At the end o f the article, I find myself wondering why it's important to find a correlation (or disprove one) between race and IQ (two relatively arbitrary categories). I can certainly see where having this information would be conducive to advocating for marginalized people living within systems built on dividing people into these categories to facilitate inequity, but I would love to live in a world where everyone, regardless of perceived intelligence or racialized identity are cared for not because of their relationship to these categories but because they're alive and deserve to have their needs met. Of course I realize this is trite and idealistic, and that the current state of the world and all its many systems makes this hope unrealistic and I think this is still a valid (née vital) line of scholarly inquiry. Just one of the thoughts I'm left with at the conclusion.