Psychiatrist should make an effort to evaluate the mental status of the defendant at the time of the offense.
They must pay very close attention to really be able to think how the criminal thought/thinks.
Psychiatrist should make an effort to evaluate the mental status of the defendant at the time of the offense.
They must pay very close attention to really be able to think how the criminal thought/thinks.
autopsy report,
Why does the autopsy matter?
Certifying the presence or absence of psychiatric illness if the defendant claims for an insanity plea
They provide evidence to prove that the criminal is legally insane.
Also the fact that the accused made no attempt to run away from the crime scene, would not indicate that he was insane
If this was the case, criminals would easily be able to act like they had a mental illness.
loss of reasoning power.
They do not get much of a say.
the person acted with his or her own free will, intentionally and for rational reasons
the person committed the crime for a purpose.
Mc Naughten rule.
"When there is a defense of insanity, every man has to be presumed to be sane..."
to distinguish between right and wrong.
How is this test different from the Wild Beast Test?
The Insane Delusion test
This test tries to prove if there is a false conception of reality?
Wild Beast test,
The Wild Beast Test was a test used in the 18th Century. The defendants were not to be convicted if they understood the crime no better than, "a wild beast "
However, in the recent past some of the U.S. states (such as Montana, Idaho, Kansas, and Utah) have banned insanity defense.
Banning the insanity defense can cause major problems for people who are mentally ill. The reason for the ban is due to sane people lying about their mental health.
The concept of responsibility connects with our most fundamental convictions about human nature
The concept of responsibility is almost the same as people lying in court. People lie in court to save themselves from a harsher punishment.
The defendant has the burden of proving the defense of insanity by a “preponderance of the evidence”
This can be very hard to do in court, they must provide detailed evidence of a mental illness to the court or else they may not get away with the crime.
was incapable of appreciating the nature of the crime
"Appreciating the crime" means that they were not mentally aware enough to understand what they were doing. They could have believed that what they were doing was alright.
prosecutions
prosecution: "the institution and conducting of legal proceedings against someone in respect of a criminal charge"
Given the literature, one might safely assume that if American Indian mascots are regarded as negative stereotypes then their psychological effects will also be negative.
Argument: Assuming the negative vs. positive of the situation of stereotyping.
A stereotype accessibility perspective (Bodenhausen & Macrae, [ 2]; Dijksterhuis & van Knippenberg, [15]; Kawakami et al., [33]; Macrae et al., [39]) suggests that if American Indians are frequently and consistently associated with only a few traits, images or behavioral tendencies, then powerful, hard-to-break, mental links or stereotypes will be formed between the social category "American Indian" and these behaviors or traits (Dijksterhuis & van Knippenberg, [15]; Major & Eccleston, [40]).
The true culture of American Indians is not being told enough. When talked about, not enough information is put out there to explain who they truly are. With little information, a stereotype is formed.
One consequence of this relative invisibility is that the views of most Americans about American Indians are formed and fostered by indirectly acquired information
People are portraying the wrong information of who American Indians really are.
Contemporary American Indians, for example, exist beyond the reach of most Americans. That is, most Americans have no direct, personal experience with American Indians (Pewewardy, [60]).
These sentences are explaining how most Americans do not understand the true culture of past or present American Indians.
Stereotypes are cognitive tools that people use to form impressions of others (Gilbert & Hixon, [24]; Macrae, Milne, & Bodenhausen, [38]). They are persistent features of human discourse, and the media is a powerful source and communicator of this discourse (Blair & Banaji, [ 1]; Davies, Spencer, Quinn, & Gerhardstein, [10]; Devine, [14]; Macrae, Bodenhausen, Milne, Thorn, & Castelli, [37]). Stereotypes are particularly powerful when the target group (i.e., the group represented by the stereotype) is unfamiliar. As Lippman ([36]) wrote in his original definition, stereotypes are "pictures in the head of the world beyond our reach."
Stereotypes are used to show what a culture looks like or seems to be in another culture. One's culture is oversimplified by another culture.
elicit
elicit: evoke or draw out a response from someone in reaction to one's own actions or questions