it should not include every single piece of data that was gathered in the study.
it also said to not omit results in the last paragraph...could there be some range in this? more of a grey area vs. black/white.
it should not include every single piece of data that was gathered in the study.
it also said to not omit results in the last paragraph...could there be some range in this? more of a grey area vs. black/white.
A balance should be made between being concise but also detailed.
a little vague. I'm sure it can be hard to find the balance. You want to build credibility but also not use extraneous detail.
Therefore, future scientists and researchers will be able to repeat the methodology and verify the research.
I know empirical research is usually "peer reviewed". Is this step of: repeat the methodology and verify research, involved in peer review? I had never really thought of what peer review actually entailed.
change it to grayscale and you should be able to easily see the difference between all of 00:34:50 your colors
What a great idea! Will definitely do this when creating social media posts,
taking that time to learn and be respectful
This plays in to reflexivity in science communication and seeing how the audience wants to be addressed, and what best reflects their experience.
wheelchair user right they use a wheelchair to facilitate their movement 00:11:06 throughout the world you can refer to the stall or the parking space or the programming as accessible
These examples are more active language which help frame the language or terms as an active participant, vs someone just having to deal with the disability.
wheelchair is how they are able to participate in the world
I really like this perspective and had not really considered this before.
there is no social stigma anymore about wearing glasses
I would be curious to see if the stigma still exists in children. The only time I have been teased about being a glasses wearer, was while I was in middle school.
hi there heartfelt poetry 7 and thank you so much for trusting me to answer this question for you and no it's not a silly or ignorant question
If you look at the original question, the user asks about the vaccines Dr. Tolson recommends. I feel Dr. Tolson did a good job explaining how a vaccine works (specifically covid) so that the user may be more/feel more equip to make their own informed decisions on vaccines to get after watching the video. She could have said, "this is how it works, get it." Instead she explains the process of the disease and vaccine with the intention of making people feel more comfortable and increasing their comprehension.
that's enough for your body to recognize it and make enough antibodies okay so you don't have 00:02:49 to get the full-blown disease or symptoms of that disease
I think it's very important she added this verbiage: full-blown disease or symptoms. My experience has been that a lot of people don't realize vaccines aren't a guarantee you will not get the disease, but that your body is better prepared to fight off the disease instead
first off no there's no hiv no 00:00:45 heavy particles vary on or whatever in the vaccines okay that's the first thing
It's great that she addresses this concern, however I would have liked for her to at least explain where this idea/notion may have come from and why it's wrong. Yes, I believe that she is a reputable source, but just saying no, these are not present may not be enough to convince some people.
That way, is she explains how this incorrect information formed, it might strengthen the "no".
this is what coronavirus looks like a bugger isn't it it's crazy how this little thing can cause so much havoc in our bodies so 00:01:09 anyway the chromovirus has these proteins on the outside they're called spike proteins because they look like little spikes
I LOVE that she uses the stuffed Model! A great way to incorporate a visual aid, while also being able to interact with it as she speaks. Also, how cute. I can only assume that this video is targeted to an wide age range, but not specifically to children...but it's not interpreted as childish, at least, that is not my interpretation. It does not feel like I'm being talked down to.